The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 25, 2021, 12:53 AM   #1
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,238
Can anyone vouch for the validity of this article?

https://americanmilitarynews.com/202...uns-in-public/

Besides being poorly written, is there any substance to this article?
I’ve seen it pop up and has been quoted several times today... all from this source.

Here is the opening paragraph:

Quote:
On Wednesday, an en banc panel of the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that the second amendment right to keep and bear arms does not citizens include the right to carry a firearm, either openly or concealed, in public .
rickyrick is offline  
Old March 25, 2021, 01:23 AM   #2
Shadow9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,974
Look up the case George Young V Hawaii. Looks like its going to SCOTUS . IMHO the court decision was WAY out of lines. What part of "Bear Arms" do they not understand?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ic-Hawaii.html
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload.

Last edited by Shadow9mm; March 25, 2021 at 08:39 AM.
Shadow9mm is offline  
Old March 25, 2021, 08:51 AM   #3
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
Also reported here: https://www.theblaze.com/news/9th-ci...uns-open-carry
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor
NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO
1911 Certified Armorer
Jeepaholic
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old March 25, 2021, 09:12 AM   #4
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
Link to the decision: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datasto...4/12-17808.pdf

And I'm moving this to L&CR
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor
NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO
1911 Certified Armorer
Jeepaholic
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old March 25, 2021, 01:17 PM   #5
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
Also reported today on MSN /Microsoft news.

Apparently the majority of the 9th Circuit ruled that there is no right to carry outside the home.

This one will be heading for the High Court, for sure.

Question is, when it gets there, will they hear it, and rule, or do something else?
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old April 1, 2021, 08:52 AM   #6
wizrd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2012
Posts: 232
"SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" - seems clear enough to me...just saying.
__________________
Sumo magis ammo
wizrd is offline  
Old April 1, 2021, 09:47 AM   #7
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,607
It's the Ninth Circuit, what can you expect? There's a reason their decisions are overturned so often. By prohibiting BOTH open and concealed carry, they have effectively ruled that the Second Amendment is only in effect inside your own home.

To quote Clarence Thomas "I find it extremely improbable that the Framers understood the Second Amendment to protect little more than carrying a gun from the bedroom to the kitchen."
__________________
Time Travelers' Wisdom:
Never Do Yesterday What Should Be Done Tomorrow.
If At Last You Do Succeed, Never Try Again.
natman is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04262 seconds with 10 queries