|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 10, 2006, 10:44 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 9, 2001
Location: TN
Posts: 134
|
I'm going to deer hunt with my 4" .357 Magnum
I am going to the range to get some more 50-75yd practice with my S&W 686 4" .357 Magnum. I have decided to try handgun deer hunting and this will be new to me. I have been shooting handguns for a while and am familiar with shooting long distances. I am going to go to the range for the next few weekends to get even more long distance shots off to keep my practice up. I will be shooting out of the box Remington 158gr JSP. From articles I've read and posts I've read here, these will give the compromise between expansion and penetration needed when hunting deer with a relatively low velocity (compared to a rifle) gun. The woods here are fairly thick so I probably won't see a shot past 50-60 yards. It's going to be fun.
Here's the gun I am going to be using: www.lxcoupe.com/images/357.jpg If anyone has any tips or experiences with handgun deer hunting, I'd love to hear them. |
November 10, 2006, 10:51 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 1998
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 428
|
I am also hunting wooded area for deer with a 4" 357 mag, a Taurus Tracker with ported barrel. I am using Federal Fusion 158 grain ammo. So far this year took a little button buck at about 30 yards. Put the shot into the chest, the deer was facing me. It dropped right there. With this weapon I would not try shooting over 40 yards or so. Good luck and hopefully we should hear of kill shortly.
__________________
Live everyday as if it is your last! Because someday you will be right. "Everyone has a game plan until they get punched in the mouth". |
November 10, 2006, 10:55 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 9, 2001
Location: TN
Posts: 134
|
Since it will be my first time I will probably limit any shots to 30-40 yards as well. Maybe once I get more experience at it I will try them farther out, but for now I'll only take the shots I know I can make.
|
November 10, 2006, 03:46 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2006
Posts: 162
|
i've killed a few with my 6" 357. I strongly reccomend buffalo bore ammo in 170 or 180 grain bullets. Standard 357 ammo is a little light for deer hunting. They(lighter ammo) will kill the deer but they wont leave an exit hole consistently, which makes for some damn hard tracking jobs. If you cant find buffalo bore, find some other 180 grain hunting ammo. And be sure to hit them broadside BEHIND the shoulder.
|
November 10, 2006, 03:58 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2, 2006
Location: Lone Star State
Posts: 198
|
|
November 10, 2006, 07:42 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,323
|
I shot a buck last year with my 480 Ruger SRH with a 2x Leupold scope. I didn't have a rifle with me at all. Woods shot; one shot, about 50 yds. Hit heart lung area and deer ran about 50-60 yds.
Choose your shot carefully. You still can't shoot through brush. Practice out to 50 to 75 yds. You'll see quite a difference in your shooting abilities after you get past 25 yds. Clay pigeons work for "plinking". 6" paper plates with a big black "X" work for targets. For me, I am going to be carrying a monopod (Stoney Pt, Polecat, Expediton model) this year as I need a rest to shoot with the scope unless I take a really quick shot. Hunting with a handgun is a whole new deal and fun. Enjoy. It will be like your first deer all over again. |
November 10, 2006, 08:18 PM | #7 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 14, 2005
Posts: 558
|
i've never shot any ammo over 158 grs. in my 6" .357 revolver... how much more recoil do you feel with 170-180 gr bullets at magnum velocities?
LIFE IS SHORT.......... |
November 10, 2006, 08:46 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: May 20, 2006
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 36
|
Description: WIN .357 Magnum SUPREME PARTITION GOLD
Count: 20 Cartridge/gauge: .357 Magnum Weight: 180gr +1 on this ammo suggestion by Capp35 Recoil is not much different from other magnum rounds but the results are much better. I use a Ruger GP100 6" with a red dot scope. I don't take shots over 40 yards.
__________________
"It's all about shot placement" - David (Slayer of Goliath) "The gun is not the answer to all of your personal protection problems, but when you need a gun, you really need a gun." |
November 11, 2006, 08:12 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 1999
Posts: 2,501
|
Another satisfied Winchester 180-grain Partition Gold user.
|
November 11, 2006, 11:12 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 10, 2005
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 401
|
JJ,
I shoot 180 gr. hardcast bullets at 1350 fps out of a GP100. Haven't used them hunting yet, but will this year on hogs. Yes, they recoil. Yes, you absolutely will know you pulled the trigger on something special. But no, it isn't painful. I shoot around 50-75 of them in a session and they aren't bad. Just a nice, solid whack to the palm, but NOTHING like a .41 mag or .44 mag.
__________________
Robert N. "Remember, Eagles may soar but Weasels don't get sucked into jet engines!" |
November 11, 2006, 04:31 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2004
Posts: 1,682
|
Winchester 180-grain Partition Gold has always worked for me.
|
November 17, 2006, 02:59 AM | #12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2006
Location: WI
Posts: 7
|
I'm trying Speer gold dot 170gr. Yes there is a difference in recoil, but nothing to be alarmed about. Good luck.
|
November 17, 2006, 10:58 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2006
Posts: 162
|
got one yesterday with mine, just a small doe, but it does make hunting a bit more of a challenge.
|
November 17, 2006, 01:29 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
125 grain bullets in .357 for deer?
I cannot understand why most shooters are recommending 158-180 bullets in the .357 for deer. I always shoot behind the deer's front shoulder where the deer has very little mass to protect his vitals (heart, lungs, liver) from a bullet. It seems logical to me that due to the minimum barrier to a bullet that the rib area presents, a high-velocity (125gr.) bullet would be more distructive to the vitals than a slower, heavyer projectile. Have you guys just assumed that the heavyer projectile would be more effective, or have you had failures with the 125's that have led to the conclusion that heavyer is better?
I cannot buy the argument: Quote:
Any thoughts? Regards, dahermit Last edited by dahermit; November 17, 2006 at 01:30 PM. Reason: Wanted to add something. |
|
November 17, 2006, 01:50 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2006
Posts: 162
|
Most sportsman grew up hunting with high power rifles or atleast shotgun slugs where the position of the game at the time of the shot isn't so critical. Granted that shot placement is always key, hunting with a 357 requires that one be patient and wait for a better than "normal" shot. If you wait for bowhunting type shots that avoid shoulders/angled shots your chances of sucess are better. I have had problems with lighter bullets not exiting the deer. They are just as dead, but hard to track.
|
November 17, 2006, 02:02 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 1999
Posts: 2,501
|
Quote:
|
|
November 17, 2006, 08:51 PM | #17 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
Quote:
Regards, dahermit |
||
November 18, 2006, 07:31 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2006
Posts: 162
|
I have never had anything less than 170 grains exit a shoulder, even with buffalo bore ammo. The doe I shot a few days ago was hit a little higher and more foward than I liked, grazing one shoulder, and smashing the other with a 180 gr B.B. cast bullet. The deer went down, but dot up and made it about 40 yds before collapsing. I did have an exit wound, but I didn't have a good blood trail, I think because I hit her higher than normal. I did have one exit with a perfect broadside with a 158 gr buffalo bore hp at 30-35 yds. When I first started hunting with a 357 I was using the 180 grain winchester partition gold, because thats all I could find in stores around here, and never got a exit wound of any kind(3 times). I will admit that I wasn't as picky about my shots then as I am now. If you want to take any kind of angled shot, better shoot a hot hard cast bullet, and be fairly skilled at tracking.
|
November 21, 2006, 04:36 PM | #19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2006
Location: WI
Posts: 7
|
Okay, here it is...I shot my first deer with my .357mag. It was a 125lb buck. It was running toward me head on. I shot first about 70yds. and missed. I then shot again at about 60yds or so and I I hit it in the chest. It did a flip forward and came crashing down. So there it is...one shot in the chest at
60yds with a 170gr bullet, dead deer, no tracking! Man that was cool! |
November 21, 2006, 07:31 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 14, 2002
Location: in the Bluegrass State
Posts: 1,610
|
My advise is NOT to take a shot past 40 yards with a 4" barrel.......hpg
__________________
NRA member Semper Paratus |
November 21, 2006, 08:54 PM | #21 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 29, 2005
Posts: 127
|
Make sure a 4" barrel is legal. In NC it's 5.5" minimum.
|
October 15, 2007, 04:21 PM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 4, 2006
Posts: 2
|
Someone asked the question, why the heavier bullet? What real advantage is there?
The answer to that question is Sectional Density. The heavier the bullet in a given caliber, the higher the sectional density. Higher sectional density means better penetration. Period. The heavier bullet is longer for its caliber and will go further into the animal while expanding than a lighter bullet of the same caliber and design. Does this mean that a 125 grain bullet won't kill deer? Certainly not...in fact, the violent expansion exhibited by the 125 grain bullets might do a great job if they miss ribs, shoulder, or anything else that might get in their way. The reason to go 158 or higher in weight is that you get better sectional density (penetration) and that is not a bad idea. SD is much more important when dealing with truly tough animals like cape buffalo or even something like bear. For the thin skinned deer, it doesn't matter as much. -haymaker18 |
October 15, 2007, 06:21 PM | #23 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,930
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|