The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 1, 2014, 07:22 PM   #1
condor bravo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2014
Location: Nevada/Ariz/CA
Posts: 1,753
Chamfering vs flaring

I question why more reloaders, when preparing cases, choose to chamfer rather than use a flaring tool to bell case mouths. If just removing inside burrs, fine, but going much farther with the tool (chamfering) can result in cutting a knife edge ridge around the case mouth rather than keeping the mouth square. A chamfer or flare is usually not even needed whem seating jacketed bullets so why remove material from the case mouth. If loading lead bullets the small chamfer flare is not sufficient and bullet shaving or neck collapsing will occur. If belling must be done, and for lead rifle bullets it must be, use a proper flaring tool. This would be the Lyman (or I think RCBS has one) M Expander die. This will flare the neck as needed without removing any metal. They are priced around twenty dollars and one bullet diameter size fits all. Meaning that the same die is good, for instance, for all .30 calibers. A taper crimp should then be used to remove the flare upon seating the bullets.

Some no doubt consider simply removing inside case neck burrs as chamfering but it is not. The definition of chamfer is to bevel and the reason given for beveling or chamfering case mouths is to facilitate bullet seating. This is hardly necessary with jacketed bullets so why remove brass from the case mouth when not necessary? However beveling must be done with lead bullets and this best accomplished with the Lyman M die by putting a flare in the case neck.

So I guess my main point here is why put a bevel edge on the case mouth by removing metal from the case mouth when it is of no benefit or not even needed? Also I think that some are misusing the term chamfering (bevelling) when they just mean inside case mouth deburring. But if you do need to bevel (flare) rifle case mouths, get the proper tool, the M die.

Last edited by condor bravo; December 1, 2014 at 08:11 PM.
condor bravo is offline  
Old December 1, 2014, 08:35 PM   #2
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
The main reason they chamfer case mouths instead of belling is it only has to be done once until the case is too long and needs trimming back a few thousandths.

Belling has to be done in a separate die operation every time the case is fired. Too much of it gets straightened out by neck expansion against the chamber neck.

If a case mouth's chamfered with a traditional tool then the sharp inside edge deburred and smoothed off by an Easy Out screw extractor of the right size, then bore brushed, that inside edge will be very round and not scrape jacket metal off bullets unbalancing them. And it lasts until the case needs trimming.
Bart B. is offline  
Old December 1, 2014, 09:25 PM   #3
condor bravo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2014
Location: Nevada/Ariz/CA
Posts: 1,753
Right, I acknowledge the above but does that mean that it, chamfering, really needs to be done when using jacketed bullets. I maintain that it does not and is just deforming the rifle cases. I reload over 35 rifle caibers and have never flared a case but with two exceptions with jacketed bullets. They are the straight walled 45-70s and .458 Win mags. These of course require a flare. And many of my magnum loads are with lead bullets that require a flare (using an M die) to keep from collapsing case necks. I guess my main point here is that chamfering, in the true sence of the word, is not necessary with jacketed bullets (with maybe rare exceptions).

Last edited by condor bravo; December 1, 2014 at 11:26 PM.
condor bravo is offline  
Old December 1, 2014, 10:34 PM   #4
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
If the case sizing dies are of good quality and correctly dimensioned, no rifle case needs a flared case mouth for jacketed bullets. Normal deburring is good enough. If jacketed bullets deform deburred and chamferred cases when they're seated. there's a dimensional issue that needs to be resolved; case, die or bullet.
Bart B. is offline  
Old December 2, 2014, 10:48 AM   #5
AllenJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,766
Quote:
I guess my main point here is that chamfering, in the true sence of the word, is not necessary with jacketed bullets (with maybe rare exceptions).
They call it camfering but in reality you are only supposed to remove any burrs that cause undo stress or damage to the bullet while seating it. I used to be one of those people until I realized a single twist with medium pressure is all that is required.
AllenJ is offline  
Old December 2, 2014, 12:46 PM   #6
mikld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,891
Any metal I handle usually has all sharp edges removed. I deburr the case mouths of my rifle brass, not for ease of bullet seating, but from many years experience as a machinist/mechanic; habit. So, yes true chamfering is not needed (a non-issue as far as I'm concerned).

FWIW; several years ago I was sizing some .38 Special brass (no chamfered mouths) and was going great when I removed my finger from the case a bit too slow and cut a nice chunk outta my left index finger. Nice clean cut So, an edge, not necessarily chamfered/sharp can hurt...
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast!
I've learned how to stand on my own two knees...
mikld is offline  
Old December 2, 2014, 02:40 PM   #7
higgite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 2010
Posts: 1,024
My brass for jacketed AR fodder gets trimmed with a Giraud trimmer that deburrs inside and out. It leaves a little bit of a chamfer. I never considered it a big deal one way or the other. ymmv
higgite is offline  
Old December 2, 2014, 03:19 PM   #8
mehavey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,869
If I trim, I chamfer. (the Giraud does both simultaneously, but most hand tools do not.)
If no trim is req'd, no chamfering is required (normally)

(minimal) Belling is normally for flat/plain-base/cast bullets
mehavey is online now  
Old December 2, 2014, 03:52 PM   #9
WIL TERRY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 2000
Location: BLACK HILLS
Posts: 1,322
CHAMFERRING is meant to break the 90* inner edge on the case mouth, Not sharpen it.
Belling is strickly for and only ever needed when using non-jacketed lead bullets.
WIL TERRY is offline  
Old December 2, 2014, 10:26 PM   #10
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
Quote:
This is hardly necessary with jacketed bullets so why remove brass from the case mouth when not necessary?
Sometimes it is necessary. I have found that chamfering cases (NOT after trimming, I always do it after trimming) is usually not needed, but sometimes, it is.

I was suffering an unacceptably high number of neck collapses in .22 Hornet cases, no matter how carefully I seated the (jacketed) bullets. Chamfering the case mouths solved the problem.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is online now  
Old December 3, 2014, 03:25 PM   #11
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,022
Condor Bravo,

If you buy a box of Lapua cases, you find them factory chamfered. Lapua does this for their commercial loading, too. There are two reasons: one is to help the bullet base self-center over the middle of the neck opening, and the other it to avoid scraping bullets (not an uncommon thing to find on commercial ammo), though they do make the chamfer fairly smooth. As Bart mentioned, you need to burnish the case mouth with something to completely avoid it. I use to run a freshly chamfered case over a carbide expander a couple of times to accomplish that, but Bart's E-Z Out method is better and I've been using it since he first posted the idea.

The M-die expander is a little bit of a different animal. The small step it forms near the mouth of the neck helps bullets start into the neck straighter so the finished cartridge tends to have less runout on a concentricity gauge, provided you were careful not to bend the necks in the first place. It can allow a standard seating die to perform about as well as one of the benchrest/competition type seating dies do with just chamfered cases. The downside is more neck working. You can expect to anneal more often to prevent neck splits that start at the case mouth. You also, especially for a self-loader, want to set the crimp shoulder in the seating die down enough to iron the step out, which can be ignored with standard loading of a chamfered case, and which also adds to more working of the case mouth brass.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old December 3, 2014, 04:20 PM   #12
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
Chamfering is done to bottle necked rifle cases. Like mehavey says, it's only done after trimming. New cases require it too. If you're putting a sharp edge on you're chamfering too much.
Flaring is done to handgun cases regardless of trimming or the bullet material.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07986 seconds with 10 queries