The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 1, 2006, 12:41 PM   #1
Para Bellum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
Defense: Pump illegal, so: Second Hand Mossberg 9200 Semi or Baikal Coach Gun?

Pump Guns are illegal where I live so I have the following choice:

For a CQB defense gun up to 10yds:

- Baikal Coach Gun for EUR 390,-



or

- a hardly used Second hand Mossberg 9200 18" parkerized Semi Auto for EUR 490,-



I intend to keep the gun loaded and ready for years.
Thank you for your time and thought.
PB
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum
If you want peace - prepare for war
Para Bellum is offline  
Old October 1, 2006, 01:09 PM   #2
liliysdad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 7, 2004
Posts: 1,145
You can have a semi auto, but no pump? Wow, simply wow.

I would go with the 9200 no questions asked. However, Id hunt around for an 100 or 11-87 first.
liliysdad is offline  
Old October 1, 2006, 01:38 PM   #3
Para Bellum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
reliability is my main concern

Quote:
You can have a semi auto, but no pump? Wow, simply wow.
Yes that is weird but true. We had a time when the pump shotgun was the favorite tool in a serious of bank robberies. Our politicians found it smart to ban these "bad bad guns". Makes no sense at all, I know.

My main conern is reliability. I don't really expect a defense-situation to requrie more than two 00 Buck shots. If yo, there still is a Glock I carry 24/7.

So the Mossberg 9200 would only be an option if I don't have to worry about it to jam with 00 Buck loads or slugs.
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum
If you want peace - prepare for war
Para Bellum is offline  
Old October 1, 2006, 01:47 PM   #4
liliysdad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 7, 2004
Posts: 1,145
In my experience, the 9200 is a very reliable gun. I prefer the Remingtons, based solely on personal preference. I would take the Mossberg over any Baikal product, but thats me.
liliysdad is offline  
Old October 1, 2006, 02:38 PM   #5
ITEOTWAWKI
Junior member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2006
Posts: 454
Couldn't you take the hunting plug out of the mossberg and get a few more rounds in there?
ITEOTWAWKI is offline  
Old October 1, 2006, 03:41 PM   #6
Para Bellum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
Quote:
hunting plug
there is no such thing. the magazine holds 4 rds (or 5?)...
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum
If you want peace - prepare for war
Para Bellum is offline  
Old October 1, 2006, 04:10 PM   #7
ITEOTWAWKI
Junior member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2006
Posts: 454
Oh, well that's enough to get by...so how many rounds does it take to rob a bank that pumps are unacceptable?
ITEOTWAWKI is offline  
Old October 1, 2006, 05:12 PM   #8
AFshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Location: Eastern Nebraska
Posts: 375
I'm wow over that semi/pump thing too.
Like I think some country you can have a suppressor no problem but no semi-rifles. Australia is it?
__________________
03 FFL,
Certified Glock Armorer,

Nebraska Concealed Carry
AFshooter is offline  
Old October 1, 2006, 05:26 PM   #9
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
Personaly I would go with the SxS. Don't have to worry about cycling and you have an instant second shot.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old October 1, 2006, 08:25 PM   #10
jfrey123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 7, 2006
Location: Reno, NV.
Posts: 1,026
I second the side by side...

Had problems with my Browning Auto-5 on Saturday out skeet shooting. It's something that has been corrected, but man it's a confidence killer when you pull the trigger and nothing happens.

You should never have that problem with a side by side, and if you need more than two trigger pulls of buck shot, you're in really, really deep S.
jfrey123 is offline  
Old October 1, 2006, 08:35 PM   #11
webbee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2005
Posts: 218
I'd go with the 9200. Is it an "A" model? A's are heavier duty use. They were originally designed for the DEA as a "jungle gun" for use against the drug running insurgents in Columbia. I thing the FBI had some too. There were a lot of the plain 9200's made in many finishes and barrel configurations.
All 9200 production has ceased at Mossberg. It's an excellent light autoloader that feeds about anything.
The reason I choose an auto over the SxS is capacity. If you are facing multiple invaders, as in a home invasion, capacity is king.
You will need to shoot whatever you buy. Practice is everything.
Learn to clean often. A sitting weapon gathers dust and oil gels if left long enough. Not to mention the rust problem.

Good luck with whatever you buy and great shooting.
webbee is offline  
Old October 1, 2006, 08:37 PM   #12
Dwight55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,568
I'll take that semi auto any day also. Mine is a Beretta, . . . holds 3 ea # 4 buck, . . . 2 00 buck, . . . and 2 slugs, . . . in that order. Stands ready at all times to do its job.

I've never personally done it, . . . but I'm told the action is fast enough to have all seven empties in the air at the same time. That's a lot of lead flying.

Again, . . . my vote is for the Mossberg.

May God bless,
Dwight
__________________
www.dwightsgunleather.com
If you can breathe, . . . thank God!
If you can read, . . . thank a teacher!
If you are reading this in English, . . . thank a Veteran!
Dwight55 is offline  
Old October 2, 2006, 07:17 PM   #13
jrklaus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 25, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 520
If you do choose a side-by-side, you may want to consider one without external hammers. Otherwise, I think I personally would vote for the semi-auto. Good luck whatever you choose!
jrklaus is offline  
Old October 2, 2006, 07:47 PM   #14
VUPDblue
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
I'd take the semi just because of more available rounds without reloading.

Quote:
Like I think some country you can have a suppressor no problem but no semi-rifles. Australia is it?
Think that's screwy? In WA state, you can own a suppressor, but it is against the law to mount it and use it...
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal !
VUPDblue is offline  
Old October 4, 2006, 03:46 PM   #15
Para Bellum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
decided: Coach Gun + No. 1 Buckshot

Thanks folks,

I decided today and finally bought a 12ga coach gun with 20" barrels and external cocking levers for the job (Baikal 43). It felt best in my hands and the 99.99% reliability of the fast second shot, i.e. two independent barrels, triggers and hammers finally convinced me. And: Both barrels fired equals or even tops a whole magazine from a machine gun. If that doesn't help, I'd still have my 9mm loaded with 16 EMBs..

I'll load the coach-gun with antimony hardened #1 Buckshot.
Here's the reason why I prefer #1 buckshot over 00 or 000:
http://www.firearmstactical.com/briefs10.htm

and, here's the little gun:

__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum
If you want peace - prepare for war
Para Bellum is offline  
Old October 4, 2006, 04:40 PM   #16
ITEOTWAWKI
Junior member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2006
Posts: 454
Nice choice! What it lacks in ammo capacity, it makes up for in class. Will surely be more of a great conversation peice than an auto as well.
ITEOTWAWKI is offline  
Old October 4, 2006, 07:38 PM   #17
gunslinger555
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2006
Location: Lima, ohio
Posts: 580
OMG you cant have pump but you can have a semi? omg..omg..omg
__________________
(")_(") OMG!!! I think I shot bunny in the face!
gunslinger555 is offline  
Old October 4, 2006, 07:56 PM   #18
hehz0r
Member
 
Join Date: August 2, 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 46
Are you going to add a recoil pad to that? I imagine it would be very uncomfortable without one.
hehz0r is offline  
Old October 5, 2006, 05:25 AM   #19
Para Bellum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
Recoil-Pad: Definately. It now has a hard-plastic-end. Maybe for use as a lethal weapon both ways round.
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum
If you want peace - prepare for war
Para Bellum is offline  
Old October 5, 2006, 04:46 PM   #20
liliysdad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 7, 2004
Posts: 1,145
I feel you made a poor choice.

However, good luck, and make sure and practice with what you have. That is the biggest piece of the puzzle.
liliysdad is offline  
Old October 5, 2006, 04:55 PM   #21
smooks75
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 27, 2006
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 161
Para Bellum

I have to agree with liliysdad. Practice, practice, practice. I have shot the 9200 and I would have bought that one but....Just shoot and have a great time! I have one and YES it does kick alot! Keep shooting!
smooks75 is offline  
Old October 5, 2006, 05:05 PM   #22
Hard Ball
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 1999
Location: California
Posts: 3,925
Go for the semi auto. Two shotd may not be enough.
__________________
"I swear to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemeis domestic or foreign WHOMSOEVER."
Hard Ball is offline  
Old October 6, 2006, 02:25 AM   #23
tulsamal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2004
Location: Vinita, OK
Posts: 2,552
Quote:
If you do choose a side-by-side, you may want to consider one without external hammers.
I have one of those SxS's stashed away (Bounty Hunter II or something like that) and the external hammers were a big part of the reason I wanted it! I can load that gun and apply the tang safety. Hammers are down. I could leave that gun like that for a hundred years and it is going to fire when you cock the hammers, take off the safety, and pull one of the triggers. Being able to store it with hammers down means the springs are relaxed. It is both safer and better for long term storage.

And I always figure it would take a bad guy an extra five seconds to figure out how the heck to fire it if he got to it first. Between the safety and the hammers, I would have a chance to either run or jump on him. A lot better than taking a 12 gauge load of buckshot to the stomach!

Now if the choice was between the SxS and the FN semiauto shotgun....

Gregg
tulsamal is offline  
Old October 6, 2006, 08:42 PM   #24
bigghoss
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2006
Location: Pueblo, Colorado
Posts: 2,664
I would go with the side by side since you want to leave it loaded all the time, that way you don't have to worry about spring fatuige. I don't even leave my moss 500 loaded for that reason. I keep my S&W 19 loaded instead. I would like to get a SXS also. can never be too prepared.
bigghoss is offline  
Old October 6, 2006, 09:19 PM   #25
liliysdad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 7, 2004
Posts: 1,145
Spring fatigue is not caused by the extended compression of a spring, it is caused by the repeated cycling of said spring. In essence, you are fatiguing the spring far more by loading and unloading than you would by leaving it loaded.
liliysdad is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07405 seconds with 8 queries