|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 27, 2021, 07:26 PM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 29, 2011
Posts: 931
|
Quote:
What firearm have you replaced as technology evolves? None. Yep....
__________________
Ex - Navy, Persian Gulf Veteran. Loved shooting the M14, 1911, M60, M2 |
July 27, 2021, 10:20 PM | #52 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
|
Personally, I haven't seen anything created by modern technology that would induce me to replace any of my old technology wood and steel firearms, whether it's handguns or rifles we're talking about.
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO 1911 Certified Armorer Jeepaholic |
July 27, 2021, 11:11 PM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 1,819
|
When a real working Lightsaber hits the market, I'll sell off my carry guns and just keep a couple plinkers for the range on those nostalgic days.
Lightsaber; I want three, a red, blue and green. Red for winter, green for spring, summer and fall and blue for nights out on the town and vacations. |
July 28, 2021, 11:48 AM | #54 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,675
|
there's a lot to be said for the range capability of a blaster over a lightsaber..
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
July 28, 2021, 12:19 PM | #55 |
member
Join Date: June 3, 2017
Location: South
Posts: 1,422
|
Game Changers, Fads and Gimmicks. A whole lot of fake internet scare tactics etc. Marketing is just getting more creative all the time. And the internet crowd buy's into all of it. Preach something over and over until it becomes the truth. Personally, I will stick with a single stack or revolver.
|
July 31, 2021, 09:16 AM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,336
|
Guns replaced: None
Guns enhanced with new technology: Several
__________________
The History and Development of the M14 EBR |
July 31, 2021, 04:06 PM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,432
|
Replaced a G26 with the SIG P365
Replaced a Browning O/U with the Beretta DT-11 with removable trigger group Replaced my Ruger MKII with a second S&W K-22 Masterpiece (who says technology always has to go forward?) Replaced my Mossberg 500 with a Ruger PCC in 9mm Not that any of the replaced guns went away; they just don't get shot as much
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
August 1, 2021, 06:50 AM | #58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Willamina, OR
Posts: 1,908
|
I suppose you could call the S&W Shield a new tech gun but when I bought mine, it fit a niche in my collection that wasn't filled by any gun I already had. I was looking for something small and concealable and the Shield seemed to check all the boxes for me. Also the only other gun in that size I wanted cost about 2x as much.
Tony |
August 1, 2021, 08:17 PM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2000
Location: Upstate
Posts: 375
|
Moved to stainless where feasible. Synthetic stocks, glass and Kevlar. But some classics just don’t translate well to modern materials.
__________________
"We have seen the enemy and he is us", Pogo |
August 1, 2021, 08:36 PM | #60 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 11, 2000
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 16,002
|
Handgun technology hasn't really evolved at all in the last forty years or so, so this is kind of a moot question.
|
August 2, 2021, 12:58 PM | #61 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,675
|
Here's a question, is a change in materials used or the manufacturing process actually a change in technology? Or is it just an adaptation of the existing/previous technology??
Lets say I make a part out of steel, and later on someone figures out how an aluminium alloy can be used and the part will still do its job the same way, and later still someone else figures out how to use a plastic to do the same job, the same way, is that really an advancement in technology? Or is it an advancement in materials technology, but not design techology? If I use computer controlled machines to make it, replacing skilled workers doing it by hand, that's an advancement in manufacturing technology, but if I'm using that CNC to make the same product, a basic design that's been in use for well over a century (or longer??) is that an advancement in Firearms technology? I don't think so, not really. And, are TINY changes in the details of how a mechanism works worthy of the term "advance in technology?" Every advertising guy seems to think so, but their job isn't to be accurate, its to sell a product. And then, there's also the fact that some people see "an improvement" where others just see "a change". One see this all the time these days, I do, virtually every time my computer upgrades itself. I see a change, but rarely an improvement, and sometimes things are worse for me after an "upgrade" than they were before.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
August 2, 2021, 01:31 PM | #62 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 15, 2019
Location: Nowhere you need to know
Posts: 326
|
I’ve never replaced a gun based on technological advances.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
August 2, 2021, 03:44 PM | #63 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 11, 2000
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 16,002
|
Quote:
|
|
August 2, 2021, 07:18 PM | #64 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,675
|
I have very little grey in my beard. Its nearly all white!
Remington introduced its "Zytel" Nylon in the early 60s. The VP 70's polymer was about a decade later. Glock and their formulation a bit more than a decade after that. Has there been anything in the last 40 years or so that "takes us to the next level"?? I haven't seen it. Some things have taken us up a step or two, but there are still a lot of steps up before we get to the next level. Where's my recoilless magnum that weighs nothing and holds 10,000 rds of ammo? Where's my jet pack? Where's my two week vacation on the Mars liner? Where's my damn flying car???? Want some amusement? watch an old show (like Disney) from the 50s and see where we were going to be in the 70s, 90s, and beyond, and see just how far we haven't come.....
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
August 2, 2021, 07:46 PM | #65 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 11, 2000
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 16,002
|
Metallic cartridge firearms are a pretty mature technology. There hasn't been a really novel operating system since the Fifties or a really new material technology since the Eighties... Nineties if you want to count mass-produced titanium parts.
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|