November 7, 2017, 11:28 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 6, 2010
Posts: 5
|
Considering a S&W 638?
I have been testing the Smith & Wesson Model 638. Pretty neat little gun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOeID2JlUKQ&t=52s |
November 7, 2017, 11:44 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
I love the function of that shrouded hammer. However, if I were to buy this style of revolver I'd choose the 438 instead. I've seen too many instances of that S&W fake silver coating flaking off. The black anodized coating seems to be more durable.
|
November 7, 2017, 01:05 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2008
Posts: 357
|
If I were to buy a snub nose revolver it would definitely be one with the shrouded exposed hammer like the one in the video.
Does the 638 and 438 have an aluminum frame? If so what is the model number for a steel frame with the shrouded hammer? |
November 7, 2017, 01:26 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Quote:
|
|
November 7, 2017, 03:21 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
I have often carried a Model 38 Airweight, predecessor to the 438 and 638, in a pocket holster. I prefer having the option to manually cock the hammer just in case I need to use it at an intermediate or longer distance.
|
November 7, 2017, 04:47 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 1, 2008
Posts: 849
|
U can't go wrong with a small frame 38spl 5 shooter !!!!
|
November 7, 2017, 05:20 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 10, 2009
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 976
|
Same here - they are neat little 5 shooters. Bought mine from a Texas cop 20 years ago...
|
November 7, 2017, 05:31 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 14, 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,918
|
I love my 638, bought it after I fell in love with the stainless 649 and wanted a lighter option for carry. For me it is the best of both worlds being able to pull and shoot with out worrying about the hammer snagging but I still have the option of going single action for more precise shots.
__________________
We know exactly where one cow with Mad-cow-disease is located, among the millions and millions of cows in America, but we haven't got a clue where thousands of illegal immigrants and terrorists are |
November 7, 2017, 05:44 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
|
Ah.... the old hunchback S&W!
Mine is an all stainless steel Bodyguard. Chromed trigger and hammer to! Deaf
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides |
November 7, 2017, 06:44 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 1,819
|
I have one of these, a 638 Airweight... and the paper in the box says it was tested by JESUS @ S&W. And when I touch off a +P round, I offer up a prayer as it kicks more than my .44 Magnums!! Lol!!!
|
November 7, 2017, 07:39 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,888
|
I'm more of a Ruger fan, but even I can't argue that the LCR is better than these S&W that have that uh... shrouded hammer (if that's the term for it) that allow a SA pull.
I wish Smith would make a model in 9mm, better yet 40. Don't care if it uses moon clips, I'm not going to carry a moon clip around for a reload. As for lower recoil loads, I really like the Hornady Critical Defense Lite for the .38. It's standard pressure and weighs 90 grains. Feels like shooting nothing.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
November 7, 2017, 09:03 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 30, 2017
Location: Columbia Basin Washington
Posts: 415
|
The steel frame version of the Model 38 was the Model 49.
The Model 38 was the Bodyguard Airweight. The Model 49 was just the Bodyguard, in stainless it was or is the Model 649. |
November 7, 2017, 11:24 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 1, 2017
Posts: 391
|
I wonder if there is a tendency for things like lint to get into that shrouded area. I know that S&W has had this design for 50+ years now, but every time I see one I think about something getting into that space and causing the hammer to get blocked from cocking all the way back.
|
November 7, 2017, 11:56 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2013
Location: Now relocated to Texas
Posts: 2,943
|
One of our officers carried a mod 49 in an ankle holster for his whole career and never complained of lint. He could pop that little revolver off his ankle and put five shots in a 3”circle so quickly. I carried a 60 as a back up or plain clothes weapon.
J frame revolvers are neat. |
November 8, 2017, 09:52 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2015
Location: The swamps of WNY
Posts: 753
|
Been carrying a 637 for a couple years or so mostly in an ankle holster. Finish is still good. know some cam chip off. Mine has been fine. I can hit with this thing. Also have CT laser grips on it.
Great carry gun. I also use an LCP, this is my "big gun". Daviod |
November 8, 2017, 04:37 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 1,819
|
I think I get lint around the triggers of my carry weapons more than any other area. Too much oil collects it and I keep my handguns all well lubed.
Last edited by shurshot; November 8, 2017 at 08:53 PM. |
November 8, 2017, 05:15 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Quote:
|
|
November 8, 2017, 06:57 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,313
|
I admit I like Rugers but if I spot one of those little S&W shrouded hammer guys when I've got some loose change lying around...well it's coming home with me.
|
November 8, 2017, 08:18 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,888
|
Quote:
Looked up the 649, price was too high for me and idk what the recoil is like in that. Must be better than the .357 LCR as it's a heavier gun, but the 638 is very reasonable in price. I'll be keeping an eye out for a used model.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
|
November 8, 2017, 10:44 PM | #20 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2016
Posts: 14
|
I recently picked up a new Model 642 Performance Center 38+P and am quite enamored with the fit, finish, functionality and most especially the trigger. If I am able to determine to my satisfaction that all Smith Performance Center revolver triggers are a similar upgrade over the standard model, I will endeavor to only purchase the same going forward.
|
November 10, 2017, 06:17 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 620
|
I have both the 638 and the 442, both are great little revolvers. I've also seen some posts about the grey finish flaking off the 638, its never been an issue with mine.
|
November 18, 2017, 07:31 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: November 3, 2011
Posts: 33
|
I always loved the look of the shrouded Model 638. I bought one about six years ago. It isn't very accurate at more than 7 yards (at least for me that is) but again it is not a target gun and more of an up close and personal SD handgun. I've got some Karl Nill grips on it which allows me to have a better grip on the gun.
|
November 18, 2017, 10:30 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2015
Location: The swamps of WNY
Posts: 753
|
I have CT laser grips on my 637. I have shot bowling pins at 25 feet hitting 5 out of 5. Not real fast, but DA.
David |
November 20, 2017, 07:29 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Posts: 448
|
You can’t lose with any J Frame. I like the 442. I could live with a 438 just fine. The only problem with J Frames is they are addicting.
__________________
TWO HANDGUNS AND RELOADS, EVERY DAY ALL DAY |
November 20, 2017, 09:53 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 18, 2016
Location: Derby City KY.
Posts: 243
|
I like the S&W 638-3 .38 SPL+P 5 shot revolver.
__________________
USMC Vietnam Veteran,0311 Grunt. 6/68 to 7/69 Semper Fi |
Tags |
638 , bodyguard , s&w , snubnose |
|
|