The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 12, 2018, 08:14 PM   #76
PatientWolf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 947
I handled one at the LGS this week. I really liked the trigger, the slide was very easy to operate and the ticket was $300. If I wasn’t looking to get a Marlin 1894CST when they are available, it probably would have come home with me.
PatientWolf is offline  
Old January 12, 2018, 09:03 PM   #77
Carl the Floor Walker
member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2017
Location: South
Posts: 1,422
I cannot see any reason why they would replace the Security Nine with the SR9 series. completely different guns.

Last edited by Carl the Floor Walker; January 12, 2018 at 10:40 PM.
Carl the Floor Walker is offline  
Old January 15, 2018, 07:42 PM   #78
Whirlwind06
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 3, 2006
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 998
I picked one of the Security 9s last week. First time at the range today was good. 150 rounds of American steel and 50 rounds of ranger 147 jhp. A few fail to ejects but other than that, shot really well. Trigger is nice, groupings were good. Really like it could see it being my EDC.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Whirlwind06 is offline  
Old January 15, 2018, 07:45 PM   #79
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,212
Quote:
A few fail to ejects but other than that, shot really well. Trigger is nice, groupings were good. Really like it could see it being my EDC.
I guess to me a number of failures to eject isn't really a good indicator, and not one that would lead me to think EDC. Maybe after I ran a few hundred more and if it didn't have any more issues.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is offline  
Old January 15, 2018, 07:55 PM   #80
Whirlwind06
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 3, 2006
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 998
Quote:
Originally Posted by TunnelRat View Post
I guess to me a number of failures to eject isn't really a good indicator, and not one that would lead me to think EDC. Maybe after I ran a few hundred more and if it didn't have any more issues.
Yep needs a few more trips to the range.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Whirlwind06 is offline  
Old January 15, 2018, 09:51 PM   #81
Carl the Floor Walker
member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2017
Location: South
Posts: 1,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by K_Mac View Post
A Rolex has small parts too, doesn't make it a bad watch. I know many folks with LCPs. I don't know of any broken parts. I have thousands of rounds through mine without a problem.
I had four LCp's and did have broken parts. I presented a number of pics of split rails, cracked frames etc. Regardless, I really don't care what others buy. I moved on from the LCP's. No Big deal.
I was at the range today and handled the Security9. Personally I really did not like the gun. I did not like how it felt in my hand and really did not like the light weight. It just felt unnaturally light. Then moving on to the LC9E, it right away felt so much more solid. You could tell they skimped on the frame quality a little, but for a trainer it might be a good second gun for my LC9s. The Security9 did seem to be a big brother of the LCP. Some may like that. If so, then this will be a great gun for them.

As far as the conversation on safety vs non safety. Not sure Just Newbies would want one. I prefer a safety. Use to using them all my life. Actually no safety might be better suited for a newbie. It takes time to develop the mind/muscle memory of a safety. I think many that buy this gun will not be frequent shooters to the range. JMO.
Carl the Floor Walker is offline  
Old January 16, 2018, 12:31 AM   #82
gc70
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl the Floor Walker
Then moving on to the LC9E, it right away felt so much more solid. You could tell they skimped on the frame quality a little, but for a trainer it might be a good second gun for my LC9s.
How did you determine "they skimped on the frame quality a little"?
gc70 is offline  
Old January 16, 2018, 07:27 PM   #83
Carl the Floor Walker
member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2017
Location: South
Posts: 1,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by gc70 View Post
How did you determine "they skimped on the frame quality a little"?
My bad, basically the same gun. I noticed the different sights right away. Almost did not recognize the gun and I have owned them since they first came out. We were really focused on the Security 9. If I am not mistaken, the finish was different.
Regardless, seems like the best deal going for Ruger right now. I know you only get one magazine. But I have about a dozen now with my LC9S and it has night sights. Might just get one of these to save wear and tear of my Carry LC9S.
Carl the Floor Walker is offline  
Old January 19, 2018, 12:02 PM   #84
rolnthdr
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2017
Posts: 1
Is there a size difference between the 15.1 and the 10.1 pistol’s?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
rolnthdr is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04293 seconds with 9 queries