The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 8, 2013, 04:12 PM   #1
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,476
Leaving an AR magazine loaded will damage it..RIGHT??

WRONG.
About 22 years ago I fully loaded a 30 round Okay Industries military surplus magazine and put it in my gun case with my old AR-15 Carbine, "just in case".

Today I took my new Colt M4 LE6920 to the range and decided the magazine had sat long enough if the spring was going to weaken or the lips spread, it would have happened by now.

It fired the entire 30 rounds perfectly with no problems at all. This leads me to believe that modern American made magazines don't deteriorate if left loaded long term.

The new Colt had only one stoppage, and that was a failure to fire. The round required some hard pulling to open the bolt, and there was no firing pin strike on the primer.
Re-chambered, it fired.
Since the round was an OLD reload, I wrote that one off to a slightly defective reload.
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old April 8, 2013, 05:36 PM   #2
FrosSsT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 17, 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 595
Compression and decompression wear the spring - not prolonged compression
FrosSsT is offline  
Old April 8, 2013, 06:51 PM   #3
Mausermolt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2007
Location: Ory-gun
Posts: 508
i had a bunch of GI mags loaded up for about 3 years and they started to form bulges on the base plate...i assumed that was from being loaded to long. but the springs were fine. what about P-mags? wouldnt the plastic eventually get brittle and break shooting all of your boo-lits on the ground/rifle?
__________________
Molon Labe
Mausermolt is offline  
Old April 8, 2013, 06:55 PM   #4
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
I once found a plastic magazine in a friends basement. it was fully loaded and had been so since before her husband passed away 10 years earlier. I loaded into my AR and didn't have a single hiccup.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
tahunua001 is offline  
Old April 8, 2013, 07:40 PM   #5
JD0x0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2013
Posts: 1,037
only if the rounds go off inside the magazine

Seriously, you're worrying about a spring in a magazine.. if it breaks in 60 years you pay $.40 cents for a new one
JD0x0 is offline  
Old April 8, 2013, 08:18 PM   #6
Technosavant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 4,040
The only potential issue is the tension causing the feed lips to spread apart. The spring will be fine, it's the weak body of the AR magazine design that becomes an issue.
Technosavant is offline  
Old April 8, 2013, 08:44 PM   #7
mrvco
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2011
Posts: 214
Who started that silly rumor anyway?

I mean new car dealerships don't put their cars up on blocks until someone buys them...
mrvco is offline  
Old April 8, 2013, 10:34 PM   #8
ttarp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2013
Posts: 888
People just continue to hate on the ar because of its initial teething issues, which were no joke, but long resolved.
ttarp is offline  
Old April 9, 2013, 01:48 PM   #9
MarkCO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,294
The feedlips on aluminum AR mags spread due to impact, not spring tension!

Every round fired, the next round hits one of the feedlips, that is the wear cycle.
__________________
Good Shooting, MarkCO
www.CarbonArms.us
MarkCO is offline  
Old April 10, 2013, 10:26 AM   #10
iraiam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
NO, the spring weakens with compression cycles. I have loaded AR and pistol magazines and left them stored that way for up to a few years, slap em - in fire them, and they are still like new.

I would also note that if you overload a magazine, the spring coils can be damaged and shorten its life span considerably, put in only the amount of rounds the mag was designed for. You can't overload many magazines, but there are some that are designed for 15 rounds and you can actually put 16 in, but you get the idea.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason
iraiam is offline  
Old April 11, 2013, 09:41 PM   #11
Ben Dover
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2013
Location: High up in the Rocky Moun
Posts: 665
I consulted a colleague in the metallurgy depaqrtment about this issue more than twenty years ago.

His advice was to just leave it loaded.
__________________
The soldier's pack is not so heavy a burden as the prisoner's chains. Dwight Eisenhower

It is very important what a man stands for.
But it is far more important what a man refuses to stand for.
Ben Dover is offline  
Old April 12, 2013, 07:23 AM   #12
Regolith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 30, 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 400
Quote:
People just continue to hate on the ar because of its initial teething issues, which were no joke, but long resolved.

This is not an AR specific myth. People believe this about any type of magazine. I've also heard people worry about leaving guns with their hammers/strikers cocked or their bolts/slides locked open.
Regolith is offline  
Old April 12, 2013, 01:07 PM   #13
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,617
In the 1970s, the Army taught us to only load 18rnds in the 20rnd mag and only 28 in the 30rnd one. This was because of concerns about "reliability".


Now, the Army (or the people in it) are s thought to be the experts but I have experienced the same kind of uninformed guidance there as one finds anywhere else. The main difference is that in the Army, you have to do it their way.

Leaving springs compressed leads to failure! That was basically true 100 years ago, especially when most gun springs were the flat type, which are most vulnerable to taking a "set". And it was true because knowing how to make a spring that wouldn't take a set, and actually doing it were much less common than today.

I have my grandfather's shotgun, bought new in 1909, and one of the advertised selling points was that its springs were guaranteed "never to take a set". Not just for the lifetime of the owner, never. And to this day, they never have. Sadly, the company backing the guarantee went away decades ago....

We know today that a properly made spring (and most are) does not weaken from being compressed and left compressed over a long time. IT is the cycles of compression/relaxation/compression that weakens a spring.

If a spring weakens only from being left compressed, its a "bad" spring. They do still happen, just not often these days.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old April 13, 2013, 04:31 AM   #14
Death from Afar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 7, 2004
Location: Living the dream in Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 1,635
As a random aside, a Bren gun magazine will take 30 rounds, but you had to put 28 in as it did occasionally jam if you had 30 in...always wondered abut that. But no, as has been noted, compression per se does not "wear" a magazine. Seems a bit silly to have a loaded magazine lying around and not emptying it by fire though.
__________________
"Beware of the Man with one gun...he probably isnt into guns enough to be safe with it".
Death from Afar is offline  
Old April 13, 2013, 12:25 PM   #15
motorhead0922
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 30, 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 635
The spring will last indefinitely under full compression. As others have stated, it's cycling between empty and loaded that fatigues the spring. And fatigue life of steel is measured in 10's of thousands of cycles to over 10's of millions of cycles. You ain't gonna hurt it.

The feed lips of the mag don't actually get an impact when the gun fires. The cartridge hits the bottom of the bolt, not the lips, as the bolt strips the round above it forward into the chamber.

The only problem is with plastic mags, kept loaded, but not in the gun. Plastic creeps over time, spreading the lips. That's why Magpul PMags have a plastic clip on the bottom that can be put on the top when the mag is loaded, to keep the top cartridge off the lips, like they would be in the gun with the bolt forward.

Aluminum does not creep, so those mags can be loaded all the time, in or out of the gun.
__________________
SAF, ACLDN, IDPA, handgunlaw.us
My AmazonSmile benefits SAF
I'd rather be carried by 6 than caged by 12.
2020: It's pronounced twenty twenty.
motorhead0922 is offline  
Old April 13, 2013, 06:47 PM   #16
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,476
That's why Magpul PMags have a plastic clip on the bottom that can be put on the top when the mag is loaded, to keep the top cartridge off the lips, like they would be in the gun with the bolt forward.

Magpul says this isn't true. The cover is nothing more than to keep dust and dirt out. It puts no pressure on the cartridges.

For years we were assured by "experts" that aluminum AR magazines would spread the lips if left loaded, now disproved.
Now they're telling people that plastic mags will spread the lips if left loaded.
Top companies like Magpul say that too is not correct.
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old April 15, 2013, 11:50 AM   #17
mdmtj
Member
 
Join Date: March 4, 2013
Posts: 80
Quote:
In the 1970s, the Army taught us to only load 18rnds in the 20rnd mag and only 28 in the 30rnd one. This was because of concerns about "reliability".
I was in the Army for 20 years beginning in the '70s. I was never taught anything like this and it certainly wasn't in any of the FMs or TMs.
mdmtj is offline  
Old April 15, 2013, 07:50 PM   #18
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,476
It wasn't in any manuals, but during the Vietnam War everyone "knew" that you had to download 20 round magazines to 18 rounds.

Some genuine multiple tour combat vets said that in their experience it was the truth, and in some units riflemen were ordered to download the 20 round mags.

Whether a 20 round mag needed to be downloaded to 18 rounds or not, it's rather difficult to argue with some guy with three tours under his belt as a combat infantryman or a Special Forces SOG vet when they tell you it's so.
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old April 15, 2013, 10:46 PM   #19
D. Manley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 13, 2008
Posts: 299
Re: Leaving an AR magazine loaded will damage it..RIGHT??

The only valid reason for downloading I know of is that some (but not all) GI style mags can be near impossible to seat with a closed bolt. I have also seen the floorplate blow off some fully loaded 30-rounders with a little rough treatment but who knows what really caused it to happen? It seems to me some GI mags have a little more substantial "ears" securing the floorplate than others. For mine that I have kept loaded I prefer PMags & use the feed ramp clip designed to relieve the pressure. I have read that Magpul has maintained fully loaded mags since they were first introduced and they still remain perfect today. They are also made with a smidgen of extra room to facilitate loading a full mag with a closed bolt.
D. Manley is offline  
Old April 16, 2013, 10:10 AM   #20
frankgh
Member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2012
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 46
Even military instructors can stray from approved course curriculum and add their own antidotal opinions. I've seen it many times. I've even seen a typo in an air force training guide become gospel!
frankgh is offline  
Old April 19, 2013, 08:32 AM   #21
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,131
I read on a very reputable internet blog that AR magazines only had a half-life of 15 years, and after that they quickly begin to decompose into toxic bauxite.:
Skans is offline  
Old April 19, 2013, 09:27 AM   #22
pat701
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2005
Location: South west Missouri
Posts: 315
I don't think it will hurt, but i am not an expert.
pat701 is offline  
Old April 21, 2013, 10:15 AM   #23
Malamute
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 6, 2004
Location: Rocky Mts
Posts: 859
I've left magazines laoded for many years, a few as long as 25 or so. They all seem to work fine.

When I messed with AR's years ago, I did notice it was easier to seat a magazine that was downloaded by a round or two when the bolt was closed. It helped also when hitting the bolt release to close the bolt on a fresh magazine. The gun would sometimes either close very slowly when cold and/or dirty, and a few times stopped. The bolt could be closed by pushing it shut with a thumb in the cutout on the side (pre-forward assist on commercial Colt AR's). Dowloading by a round or two helped noticably.
__________________
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-
Malamute is offline  
Old April 21, 2013, 10:34 AM   #24
Alabama Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2012
Location: Sweet Home
Posts: 886
Quote:
In the 1970s, the Army taught us to only load 18rnds in the 20rnd mag and only 28 in the 30rnd one. This was because of concerns about "reliability".
From a casual shooting perspective this is not a problem.

From a military perspective it is a little different. In operations magazines will get filled with dirt and dust. If that works it's way into area between the first round and the feed lips it can lock it up tighter than drum. I have seen this many times when the soldier tries to chamber or reload and can not and then bangs the weapon on the ground to get it to load.


Putting fewer rounds in the magazine can help by reducing the tension on the spring. On the other hand this will cause the magazine to wear out slight faster due to the extra play in the magazine.


Most pros don't notice this problem because on a regular basis they unload their magazines and clean the mag and the rounds and then reload.
__________________
Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday.
Alabama Shooter is offline  
Old April 21, 2013, 01:20 PM   #25
tulsamal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2004
Location: Vinita, OK
Posts: 2,552
Quote:
I've left magazines laoded for many years, a few as long as 25 or so. They all seem to work fine.
I'm not trying to argue and I leave a bunch of my mags loaded. But I have seen magazines fail. For instance, I have a WWII M1 Carbine. I put the GI green sleeve on the buttstock that holds two magazines. Put two loaded GI 15 round magazines in that sleeve. (These mags looked brand new.) Left it that way for.... I don't know, 3-4 years. If I wanted to shoot the rifle, I just left those two mags there. I decided to fire them one day and took the rifle out in the pasture. Both mags failed. There would fire maybe half the mag and then just stop without raising the next round. It's like the mag spring wasn't long enough any more to push the carrier all the way to the top.

I threw them both away. And I don't keep my M1 Carbine mags loaded anymore. Maybe it is a design thing with that mag... I decided to "take the hint."

Gregg
tulsamal is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.12914 seconds with 10 queries