The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 7, 2016, 01:46 PM   #1
gmarr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 261
Scope for a .257 Roberts

Finally going to put a scope on a .257 Roberts (Ruger M77). Trying to decide between a fixed power or variable. Either a 6x or a 2 x 7. Most shots should no further than 150 yds give or take. Any suggestions? Thanks.
gmarr is offline  
Old August 7, 2016, 01:48 PM   #2
Fla_dogman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2015
Posts: 265
My vote is variable. The ability to zoom in to get a better look has its benefits

Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
Fla_dogman is offline  
Old August 7, 2016, 02:55 PM   #3
lefteye
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2006
Posts: 1,433
Variable, much better for closer shots than a 6x.
__________________
Vietnam Veteran ('69-'70)
NRA Life Member
RMEF Life Member
lefteye is offline  
Old August 7, 2016, 03:12 PM   #4
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,274
Scopes of different quality have different performance.

I have a 6x 42 mm Leupold on my .257 Ackley.IMO,its perfect.

I would not put a different scope on it.(Theres always SOMEBODY!!! )

Just to verify up close performance,in a dim room,no lights on,I picked up that rifle and sighted on a small flower pot at 20 feet.No problem,I could easily place a shot,prairie dog to deer.

It might make a difference that the scope is mounted very low,and at the right eye relief.

If I look at a target,close my eyes,bring the rifle into position on my cheek,and open my eyes,I have full field,crosshairs on target.I do not have to find anything

For me,that scope,setup the way it is,is as fast and easy as irons.

Last edited by HiBC; August 7, 2016 at 03:26 PM.
HiBC is offline  
Old August 7, 2016, 03:49 PM   #5
GeauxTide
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,415
For that distance, a 4x is a much better choice.
GeauxTide is offline  
Old August 7, 2016, 04:24 PM   #6
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,274
I agree,GT !. For 20 ft shots, 2 1/2 x is even better!! But I did not build it for 20 ft.

That's my antelope rifle,too. I've used it in excess of 400 yds,which is plenty far for a .257.(I did not need more power).

I can see well enough for prairie dogs to about 300.

The Duplex is two mils,tip to tip.Thats handy.

Its always on the right power.
HiBC is offline  
Old August 7, 2016, 05:40 PM   #7
CarJunkieLS1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2013
Posts: 686
A plain jane 3-9x40 or a 2-7x33 will be all 99% of hunters will ever need... I have rifles with 3-9x40's with 4-12x40's and even 4-16x44 and where I hunt the max distance shot I could possibly take is 217 yards.

Every time I go into the stand my scope is on 3x or 4x. NOT ONCE have I needed more magnification. But I use it when I'm sighting the rifle in or punching paper.
CarJunkieLS1 is offline  
Old August 7, 2016, 06:10 PM   #8
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
2-7 or 3-9, plenty good. I'd prefer a fixed 4X over a 6X, though. Quite adequate for deer or antelope to 400 yards and a wider field of view for close-in shots.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old August 7, 2016, 07:58 PM   #9
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
Fixed power scopes used to be cheaper and more reliable but not now.
For the range and game size for which the 257 is suitable, I'd suggest the 2-7x.
My 257R carbine has a 2-6x32 which is perfect in both size and target enhancement.
FWIW
My 7mm08 carbine has a 1.5-6x32 for similar reasons.
Mobuck is offline  
Old August 7, 2016, 09:02 PM   #10
Sure Shot Mc Gee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
Straight 6 power. I would think its eye relief is better.
Sure Shot Mc Gee is offline  
Old August 7, 2016, 09:35 PM   #11
603Country
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,995
Sure, a 4 or 6 power scope will work, and so will a 2x7 or 3x9. But, since I punch a lot of paper at 100 yards, I like a scope that will let me see the bullet holes. A 4x12 will allow that, but I've gotten fond of 4x16-40 scopes. That's what I recommend, and that's what I use. Don't need no stinkin spotting scope...
603Country is offline  
Old August 7, 2016, 09:39 PM   #12
lefteye
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2006
Posts: 1,433
Why I prefer a variable such as the Leupold Vari-X III 2.5 x 8 I have on three rifles: On a hunt in the Bob Marshall Wilderness on the west slope of the continental divide I got my largest elk ever at about 25 yards and my first (and only) black bear at about 400 yards with my .300 Win Mag with this scope. There are a couple of brands that are better, e.g., Swarovski and Kahles (the brands of my best binoculars), but they are quite expensive.
__________________
Vietnam Veteran ('69-'70)
NRA Life Member
RMEF Life Member
lefteye is offline  
Old August 8, 2016, 03:40 AM   #13
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,274
I have a mildot version of tha 2.5-8 VX 3 on an AR.I agree.its a great scope.

To each his own on the spotting scope,603.

My Kowa works every time at 300 yds.That is the range I sight in,precisely,with my spotting scope.I can keep my shots in the orange diamond of a Leupold target at that range.

All up,WITH the 6x42 Leupold,the rifle I built on a Mex 98 small ring weighs 7 lbs.
It works low crawling through sage and cactus or at 9000 feet.

With a 115 gr Nosler BT at 3050 fps,I get a 100 yd zeroon the upper duplex post,300 yd zero center crosshair,and a 435 yd zero lower duplex tip.

An antelope is in the ballpark 14 in whithers to brisket. Two mils is real close to 7 in.Mildot ranging principle,antelope fits my duplex? 200 yds.Center to post tip? 400 yds.Out to 400,trajectory is good enough,I don't need a laser rangfinder.

I can interpolate from there.

I've been shooting it as my main hunting rifle 25 years. It works.

Not one animal lost with that rifle.

Exit pupil 7mm.Gives all the light the human eyeball can accept.

Compact,light(compared to larger variables) .Has not failed me in 25 years.

And everything in the view is exactly the same,every time.

Last edited by HiBC; August 8, 2016 at 03:47 AM.
HiBC is offline  
Old August 8, 2016, 07:42 AM   #14
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
A fixed 6X scope is too much scope for the majority of your uses. Out to 150 yards you don't need more than 3X.

I've found that for close work a 1-4X variable is ideal. On 1X it is faster than irons and 4X is enough for 200-300 yards.

For general use a 3-9X40 scope is hard to beat. I rarely take it off 3X and have taken shots well over 150 yards with it on that setting. Generally speaking this is the sweet spot for value. You'll get more scope for your dollar with a 3-9X than any other configuration.

I used to like a 2-7X, but lately find they are a lot bigger and heavier than a 1-4X and not enough smaller than a 3-9X to matter.
jmr40 is offline  
Old August 8, 2016, 07:45 AM   #15
Jack O'Conner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Manatee County, Florida
Posts: 1,974
I've had good luck with the 2 -7X option.

Jack
__________________
Fire up the grill! Deer hunting IS NOT catch and release.
Jack O'Conner is offline  
Old August 8, 2016, 08:38 AM   #16
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
My own opinion is that the .257 Roberts is more of a hunting cartridge than a target-shooting cartridge. Any scope should be selected to meet the most likely usage.

With the light recoil, eye relief is not a critical matter. In hunting, field of view is.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old August 8, 2016, 09:56 AM   #17
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
Not sure I'd go with the 6X if you're limiting your shooting to 150 yards.

Best scope I had on my M-70 Win. Featherweight in 257 was a Leopold 2.5 Fixed power and it was good much further then that.

I don't like High Power scopes for short range, Too slow in finding the target.

The 2X7 would give you the best of both worlds for the type of shooting you mentioned.

Yeah the 257 Rbts isn't considered a target round, BUT, don't underestimate its abilities. When the bullets out there today, it can be a long range round.

The Hornady IB or BTSP, and the Berger 115 gr. bullets are good (for hunting deer/antelope size animals) for 600-750 yards.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old August 8, 2016, 10:21 AM   #18
AllenJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,766
I would opt for the 2-7, 6X is pretty powerful for closer shots.
AllenJ is offline  
Old August 8, 2016, 12:19 PM   #19
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
A 6X might limit close in focus. A 2X-7X will not. However, most hunters with variables set the thing on one magnification, like 4X, and leave it there. Rarely will you have time, even in a blind, to fiddle with the sights.
FOV is decidedly different between 6X and 2X though. 6X Leupold FX-3's is 17.3 ft at 100. 2x runs 44.6 ft.
"...eye relief is better... " Will be very close to identical. 6X Leupold FX-3's is 4.40". 4.2 for their VX-2 2x-7X.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old August 8, 2016, 06:17 PM   #20
603Country
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,995
I shot a lot of deer using 4 power optics. Same with 6 power optics. Then on to 3-9. Now, as I mentioned earlier, I use either a 4.5-14 or a 4-16. Normally I leave the scope set on 5 if I'm in the woods, or set on 8 if I'm hunting a right of way. Got no problem finding a loping coyote at 8 power. I also have no problem changing magnification if I need to.

I sold the 6 power. Gave away a Zeiss 3-9. Boxed the 4 power and stored it away somewhere. Put the 2-7's on the rim fires. Unless weight is a serious consideration, I just don't see the joy in limiting myself to low magnification scopes. If I see a coyote out on my hay field at 400 yards, I'm dialing the scope to max and shooting his fawn-eating b___. Explain to me why I need to use a 2.5 or 4 power scope to do that if I don't need to.

Buy what you want. I did.
603Country is offline  
Old August 9, 2016, 06:34 PM   #21
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,274
This all boils down to preference.
We all have our different ways of going about things and different priorities.

Whatever works for you is good.

I'd agree with those who suggest,for a max range of 150 yds,4x is plenty for game hunting,and probably preferable to 6x.And I'm quite sure a good 4x is enough for a prairie dog at 150 yds.

I'm in Colorado,and use my .257 more in open space.To match the capabilities of the .257 R chambered rifle., from the context of my uses/experience,I prefer the 6x.The .257 R works quite well to 300 yds +

None of us are wrong.

Hopefully,the OP can weigh our inputs,and make a choice that puts a on his face for the $ he spends.

And its fine with me if that is a fixed 3x or a 4-16 by 50 mm variable.

I know what I'm happy with.
HiBC is offline  
Old August 9, 2016, 07:27 PM   #22
603Country
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,995
Well said, HiBC. I was quite effective out to 150 with my old Marlin 35Rem and 4 power scope. With the 6 power on a 270 I shot a coyote at 365 yards. The fact that I favor the 4-16 variable has very little to do with any real need for 16 power except when I'm blasting paper targets. I did shoot a hog at 490 yards a year or so back, and I did have the scope on 16 power then, but that was one shot.
603Country is offline  
Old August 11, 2016, 05:35 PM   #23
Paul B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,795
Most of my rifles have 3x9X scopes. I've only used 9X one time at a 530 yard shot at a cow elk. Almost every shot I've taken had the scope set at 3X. About the only time 9X is used is at the range where I use it to hold more precisely. Final shots are at 3X to make sure there's no radical change of POI.
My Win. M70 FWT in 7x57 has a 2x7X Leupold compact which looks about perfect on that rifle. My matching M70 FWT in .257 Robt. has a Leupold 3x9X. That's only because I couldn't find a 2x7 and wanted to set the rifle up to shoot. :roll eyes:
Paul B.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION!
Paul B. is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08817 seconds with 8 queries