The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 29, 2016, 12:08 PM   #1
BradP
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 29, 2016
Posts: 7
308 barrel length

I have just acquired a 18" barreled 308. My question is will there be too much of a velocity loss to still be a 300 yard hunting rifle? I know this question has been asked before, but I can't find quite the answer I'm looking for. Thanks in advance.
BradP is offline  
Old October 29, 2016, 12:30 PM   #2
Wyosmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
Oh heck no!
If you look at the scores and the performance on game of the 30-40 Krag from 100 years ago, it is quite good. The 18" barrel you have with a 308 is going to do a bit better than the Krag did with a 22" barrel and factory loads.
I have a 16" 308 and my wife and a friend both used it last year to kill elk at about 350 yards.
Worked just fine!
Wyosmith is offline  
Old October 29, 2016, 01:32 PM   #3
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,809
You might be 200 fps slower than a 24" barrel. That will put you very close to WW-1 era 30-06 loads from a 24" barrel.
jmr40 is offline  
Old October 29, 2016, 02:18 PM   #4
BradP
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 29, 2016
Posts: 7
But that should still be capable for deer to 300?
BradP is offline  
Old October 29, 2016, 02:29 PM   #5
GeorgeStrickland
Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2009
Posts: 20
Short barrel 308

For many years I used a Remington Mohawk 600 in 308 . I loaded a Sierra 180 grain round nose over Olin 748 . All the deer I shot with it never complained !
GeorgeStrickland is offline  
Old October 29, 2016, 03:38 PM   #6
Wyosmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
It's capable of clean kills on deer out to 500 yards.

If you look at the ballistic charts for a 30-30 170 grain load at 200 yards and your 308 load at 500 or even 600 yards you will see you have all the deer rifle you need.

I doubt you will find any hunters with much experience who will tell you a 30-30 is not good enough to kill deer out to about 200 yards. And you have a lot more gun than the average 30-30!

You are likely overthinking this.

Learn your gun and load and gain the skills. You have a very good tool for deer hunting.
I, my wife and several of my friends have put a lot of elk down with our 308s most of which have 18" barrel, and my MVP has only a 16" barrel.
Elk are a LOT bigger and tougher then deer. At 350 to 450 yards I can tell you from experience that the 308 is ok for elk. Don't worry about it being too weak for deer.

Gun-writers of today will try to sell you something, but that's their job. If you read many of the magazines that litter the shelves today you will be told you need some ultra-stupendous-super-uber-duper-mega-magnum.

BS!

You need skill and a cool head.
You'll do just fine.

Last edited by Wyosmith; October 29, 2016 at 03:44 PM.
Wyosmith is offline  
Old October 29, 2016, 03:43 PM   #7
BradP
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 29, 2016
Posts: 7
You're right. Sometimes a fellow just needs a little reaffirmation. Thanks for the responses!!
BradP is offline  
Old October 31, 2016, 08:55 PM   #8
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
Just my opinion but short barreled .308 rifles are fairly obnoxious to shoot. I have a 20" .308 carbine that is a very capable deer killer BUT I don't use it much since it's LOUD and has significant recoil for it's actual performance.
Mobuck is offline  
Old November 1, 2016, 07:59 AM   #9
Mike / Tx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2000
Posts: 2,101
I use a Ruger Compact with a thin 16.5" barrel. Depending on the ammo I usually average mid 2500 to mid 2600fps with 150gr bullets. It has taken over a half dozen feral hogs in the 250-400# range out past 300yds with DRT results.

Like mentioned, find something it likes and learn it, the rifle and caliber are plenty capable if you use the proper combination for your game.
__________________
LAter,
Mike / TX
Mike / Tx is offline  
Old November 1, 2016, 11:40 AM   #10
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
"...kills on deer out to 500 yards..." Provided you know the ballistics. A 165 grain .308 drops like a brick past 300. Sighted in at 200 it'll drop roughly 8.6 at 300. 25" at 400. Energy's there though.
Like Mobuck says, short barrels make 'em loud with lots of muzzle blast. Only matter when sighting in though. Deer hunting doesn't involve fire fights. Does involve a fair bit of carrying. Carbines are really good for that.
"...can't find quite the answer I'm looking for..." What is that? snicker.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old November 1, 2016, 07:13 PM   #11
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
Sir T.O'Heir, I note that your 165-grain .308 data is right at being equal to my .30-'06 150-grain data for 400 yards. Roughly, a two-foot drop when zeroed at 200. (Four feet at 500, on my home range.)

I load fairly hot; a couple of easy one-shot kills at 350 and 450 yards. Witnesses spoke of my father's kills at around 500 yards with his loads no hotter than GI specs.

So, back to the .308. It fairly well replicates the old GI '06 load with an 18" to 20" barrel--as designed.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old November 1, 2016, 08:54 PM   #12
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,835
Quote:
For many years I used a Remington Mohawk 600 in 308 . I loaded a Sierra 180 grain round nose over Olin 748 . All the deer I shot with it never complained !
EXACTLY THIS!!!

Except my rifle was the earlier vent rib Remington 600 not the Mohawk. And I preferred the Sierra 165gr BTHP for deer.

I shot that rifle A LOT, and got pretty good with it, even making a (later measured) 627yd first round hit on a woodchuck, using 125gr. Total fluke, the force was REALLY with me, but of course I did take credit. (and yes, it was witnessed by others, and no, I have never been able to do it again...)

The .308 Win has the energy to make a clean kill on a deer at any range you can hit the deer. The limiting factor is YOU, and not only your knowledge of drop, but also your skill at "reading" the wind.

DO both right, the .308 will NOT let you down.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old November 1, 2016, 11:32 PM   #13
doofus47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
You're fine.
Happy shooting
__________________
I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time.
doofus47 is offline  
Old November 2, 2016, 10:31 AM   #14
Primed Case
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2016
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1
My standar 150 gr load that shoots 2800 from my 26" 700VS. The same load runs about 2500 from my 16" SR 762. Your 18" bbl should be a bit faster than that.
Primed Case is offline  
Old November 3, 2016, 05:52 AM   #15
Jack O'Conner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Manatee County, Florida
Posts: 1,976
Just focus upon marksmanship. If you hit the animal through the chest organs with your .308 at 300 yards, it will topple quickly. Shot placement and bullet performance is what kills game animals and not figures upon paper charts.

Jack
__________________
Fire up the grill! Deer hunting IS NOT catch and release.
Jack O'Conner is offline  
Old November 3, 2016, 08:33 PM   #16
alex0535
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 908
People put bullets on target much farther with accuracy on .308 barrels this short. If you can do your part at 300 yards to put bullet into vitals, the deer sized animal will not know the difference between an 18" and a 28" barrel.
alex0535 is offline  
Old November 4, 2016, 09:14 PM   #17
Rich Coyle
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 28, 2016
Posts: 5
308 barrel length

BradP,

I used a .308 this year that is 18" long. With 155 grain Sierra they averaged 2,775 feet per second. With the new Hammer solid copper 101 grain they averaged 3,341 feet per second.
__________________
Stay busy!
Rich Coyle is offline  
Old November 6, 2016, 11:13 AM   #18
Chainsaw.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 12, 2015
Location: Issaquah WA. Its a dry rain.
Posts: 1,774
My buddy just came back from a three day hunt with the 16" 260 remington (6.5x308) chambered rifle I cerosafed for him. Said it sure beat the heck out of carring around the 7mm mag he is used to. Something nice aboit a short barrel. You'll have plenty of oopmf to take a deer.
Chainsaw. is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05334 seconds with 10 queries