|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 8, 2012, 12:18 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 3, 2011
Location: Vernon AZ
Posts: 1,195
|
Prohibited person would this constitute
A friend of mine used a pistol to stave off an attack by an intruder. She was arrested and charged with multiple felonies. Her attorney, a noted Arizona 2nd amendment lawyer and libertarian has negotiated a plea arrangement. He claims that she will not loose her gun rights. Following is a summary of the agreement:
She pleads guilty to a felony, receives a years probation and if she successfully completes the probation she "could" have the conviction reduced to a misdemeanor. both the felony and misdemeanor carry a possible sentence of more than one year. My understanding is that this will disqualify her from ownership/possession of a firearm. What are your thoughts. PS I intend to do a full posting on the situation once the case has been completed. Please refrain from asking about the specifics of the case. Last edited by ltc444; August 8, 2012 at 12:19 AM. Reason: Ad location |
August 8, 2012, 04:07 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 16, 2008
Posts: 1,184
|
As long as the misdemeanor is punishable by two years or less it is not a "crime punishable by more the a year in prison."
Congress excluded expunged, pardoned, or set aside convictions as well as convictions for crimes defined as a misdemeanor and punishable by two years or less. As to the effect of the change in judgment that is a matter of state law. Would the state courts still consider her to have been convicted of the felony? In some states such action has the effect of completely wiping out the prior conviction as if it never happened. While on probation she will likely be a prohibited person. Most states consider people on probation under a severed adjudication to be convicted for most purposes because they have operation guilty. It is not until after probation is complete that one would no longer be prohibited. |
August 8, 2012, 06:11 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,883
|
Quote:
|
|
August 8, 2012, 08:13 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Maybe. Two questions:
- Will the misdemeanor fall under Lautenberg (domestic violence)? (if so then yes she will be prohibited) - Will the probation be for a full year?
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
August 8, 2012, 09:26 AM | #5 | ||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
The OP says the the person's lawyer is: In addition --
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
||
August 8, 2012, 10:43 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 3, 2011
Location: Vernon AZ
Posts: 1,195
|
Answer to questions: Will relay to friend.
Arizona Pinal County. There are issues with the investigation her husband is a very vocal critic of the Sheriff. Not sure if domestic violence. Will have her ask. The problem is a trust issue with the attorney. He, unfortunately running for US Senate, is focused on other issues and not focused on the case. Will have her ask specifically about the AZ law regarding gun. |
August 8, 2012, 11:05 AM | #7 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
August 8, 2012, 12:05 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,315
|
I think that once you make the list, you will have a hard time getting off it.
The fact that she was charged at all pretty much says this is much more complex. Add the bad politics. To paraphrase G.Gordon Liddy, " I am not permitted to own firearms. Mrs. Liddy, however has an exceptional collection." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|