|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 20, 2013, 01:58 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2010
Location: The ATL (OTP)
Posts: 3,944
|
Arrested, Cleared, But Gun Not Returned
It is often pointed out that if involved in a shooting you will have your weapon confiscated and it may be difficult to get it back even if cleared in the shooting. Here is an example of a suburban Atlanta businessman who was improperly arrested and even after the Judge dismissed the case can’t seem to get his weapon back.
So, basically the gentleman owns a furniture store in an area of DeKalb County that has an above average crime rate. He has a Georgia Weapons License and carries a handgun on his private property. One day as he is investigating some strange people in his parking lot the Police arrive in response to a neighboring business owner’s call about the same individuals. He apparently notified Police of his gun along with the fact that he had a license at which time they disarmed him and placed him in the squad car. They then arrested him for loitering, confiscated his gun and towed his personal vehicle. When the case went before a Judge the case was dismissed. However after a year he still has not received his gun back after repeated attempts to retrieve it. At this point he has retained the services of an attorney seeking his weapon, financial restitution for towing and an apology. I suppose there could be more to the story, but apparently the Judge did not think so and Police are not talking. Again, just an example of how you could loose your private property and how some Police Officers may feel no obligation to return it. http://www.wsbtv.com/videos/news/bus...is-own/vCJhbG/
__________________
A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman |
November 20, 2013, 08:12 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,243
|
That kind of thing has some influence over what I CC. I would be upset to lose any of my guns but if it was one that was a gift, passed down from dad or grandpa, or valuable and rare I would be very upset.
Even though it is illegal for the police to wrongly deprive someone of their property it happens a lot and generally a blind eye is turned.
__________________
Seams like once we the people give what, at the time, seams like a reasonable inch and "they" take the unreasonable mile we can only get that mile back one inch at a time. No spelun and grammar is not my specialty. So please don't hurt my sensitive little feelings by teasing me about it. |
November 20, 2013, 08:21 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,157
|
Slightly off topic, but if one is detained for whatever reason as in the case cited, if you were on your own property, would the police have the right to seize every gun on the property?
For example, if you have a CC and a neighbor complains that he/she can see your weapon, can the police, in the course of investigation, force you to open your safe and seize every weapon there or can they only seize the weapon that initiated the complaint? I can imagine some guns "vanishing" into thin air.
__________________
Geetarman Carpe Cerveza |
November 20, 2013, 08:53 AM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 20, 2012
Location: The "Gunshine State"
Posts: 1,981
|
No they cannot
|
November 20, 2013, 09:52 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2011
Location: Ohio-Kentucky - florida
Posts: 1,221
|
Arrested, Cleared, But Gun Not Returned
Once I had to get a letter from the judge to get one back. Regardless of value of gun it's the principal of the matter. I was instructed by property room personnel that's what I needed to get it back.
|
November 20, 2013, 02:21 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,403
|
Quote:
In most parts of Utah, it is quite common for people to believe they can't get their firearms back after being confiscated, or can't get the firearm of a family member that committed suicide. However, they just have to formally request return of the firearm from the judge handling the case. The Judge can deny the request, for no reason whatsoever, but doing so is extremely uncommon. In a recent case involving a suicide with a family heirloom pistol, and confiscation of a CC firearm from a witness, the family paid a lawyer over six thousand dollars to "fight" to get the handguns back. Part way through the lawyer's "process", the wife of the deceased got a phone call from the Sheriff's office, asking if she was ever going to request the firearm from the judge, so it would stop rusting in their evidence locker. Within the week, both firearms were released for pickup by their respective owners.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
November 20, 2013, 02:22 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2010
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,293
|
This is really the kind of thing that needs to go to the courts and requires a big settlement, it would send a message to anti gun localities like Chicago, New Orleans, Atlanta etc that they cannot "punish' lawful gun owners simply because they dislike the 2A without consequences
__________________
"....The swords of others will set you your limits". |
November 20, 2013, 02:23 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,968
|
he needs a lawyer to sue to get his gun back it seems, though he shouldn't need to do so.
|
November 20, 2013, 03:09 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2011
Location: Ohio-Kentucky - florida
Posts: 1,221
|
Arrested, Cleared, But Gun Not Returned
|
November 20, 2013, 03:18 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,453
|
Quite probably, all it would take is letter from the District Attorney to the agency holding the firearm. The case is disposed of and appeals are not an issue. Believe I would petition them in writing, first.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice. |
November 20, 2013, 03:31 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2009
Posts: 566
|
Not to derail this thread, but can anyone clarify if the sheriff can legally require a person to present "proof of ownership" to reclaim a stolen rifle that has been recovered by the sheriff's department? What would you consider legal "proof of ownership", a bill of sale, receipt from FFL, or something else?
I had a buddy who saw his SKS on the local news in a picture of the spoils of a sheriff's drug bust. He was told he would have to provide documentation of his purchase of the rifle to reclaim it. He did file a report on the break-in when it was stolen, but either the rifle was purchased from another individual without a bill of sale or the bill of sale had been lost. This buddy never took any further action, and the rifle was not a great specimen of SKS. I am wondering about a couple of my undocumented firearms that were legally purchased but without paper work. I do have serial # photographs stored online, for what that is worth. |
November 20, 2013, 03:50 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,403
|
Quote:
Whether or not that would suffice in other areas would likely be highly dependent upon local regulations and politics.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
November 20, 2013, 09:54 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 7, 2007
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 941
|
I had a friend (deceased) who owned a gunshop that was broken into and several guns were stolen. One of the guns was a customized Colt DA revolver (model I can't remember). It was recovered by NYPD. After all the legal stuff the judge said he could get the gun back. It took nearly a year and several letters from the judge to help get the gun. The Judge finally had to threaten to hold the property officer in comtempt of court to get the gun back. When he did receive the gun it was nothing more than a bad paperweight. The custom grips were removed, the barrel had been replaced, several internal parts were missing or had been replaced with extremely worn parts. The only part that was original was the frame. My point is to make sure it is in the same condition as it was when it was taken.
|
November 20, 2013, 10:04 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2009
Location: North Central Illinois
Posts: 2,706
|
Quote:
|
|
November 20, 2013, 11:01 PM | #15 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
November 21, 2013, 05:45 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,820
|
Quote:
OR is this only in certain states?
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario! |
|
November 21, 2013, 05:57 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,243
|
I would think if you have a list of model and serial numbers, and maybe pictures, that would be enough to establish ownership in any sane persons mind.
But when dealing with the legal system who knows for sure? I have heard some real horror stories when it comes to getting them back from an evidence lock up. From being striped, or "lost", to being "mistakenly" sent to the melt pile. Hope I never have to find out.
__________________
Seams like once we the people give what, at the time, seams like a reasonable inch and "they" take the unreasonable mile we can only get that mile back one inch at a time. No spelun and grammar is not my specialty. So please don't hurt my sensitive little feelings by teasing me about it. |
November 21, 2013, 07:21 PM | #18 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,436
|
Quote:
I'm a 1911 person. Older Colt M1991A1s are excellent candidates for this usage. They are still Colts, but they aren't obscenely expensive and the finish even when new wasn't anything to write home about. I can carry an M1991A1 without obsessing over it, and keep the Mark IV safely at home. |
|
November 21, 2013, 11:57 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 10, 2010
Posts: 720
|
The issue I see is how can you prove (not who said they own it) but who can you prove was the last one that purchased it or inherited it? While there is some argument to the fact that filling a false police report is against the law, what if you purchased the firearm through a private sale, not knowing it was stolen previously from the person who purchased it originally, and that owner was never made whole, as in firearm returned? There can be many issues when this comes up as I see it. So, to start off with, how was the firearm purchased? Through a FFL? If so should be easy enough to clear up. If not, it may not be if ownership is contested.
Last edited by Fishing_Cabin; November 22, 2013 at 12:05 AM. |
November 22, 2013, 12:03 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,243
|
If the person that it was stolen from can show they have a prior claim, such as a stolen gun report it is theirs. Even if they have been compensated you do not have a claim even though you paid for it. The insurance company now has the first claim to it. At least that is my nonlegal person understanding of these things.
__________________
Seams like once we the people give what, at the time, seams like a reasonable inch and "they" take the unreasonable mile we can only get that mile back one inch at a time. No spelun and grammar is not my specialty. So please don't hurt my sensitive little feelings by teasing me about it. |
November 22, 2013, 12:29 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2011
Posts: 356
|
Just the other day, one buddy was showing his best friend a gun (unspecified what kind of gun in the news report). The gun was accidentally dropped and discharged, killing the best friend. The San Diego police confiscated every firearm in the house (five total, at least four of which were long guns). So legal or not, it happens.
San Francisco and Oakland were both sued by CalGuns Foundation for their policies with respect to the return of firearms to their owners. In the typical case, when the criminal case is concluded the Cal AG will issue a letter authorizing the police to release the weapon. But neither of these departments, due to some wording in the letter, would agree to release any weapon without further proof of "ownership"-- even though this was the procedure outlined by statute--and that a police officer had confiscated it from the person seeking its return was not enough "proof." I am pretty sure both of those cases were settled. An additional party was the AG, which refused to change the language of the letter so as to clarify the apparent ambiguity on which these departments were hung up. There was another case in northern California--Marin if recollection serves. Elderly man was the victim of a home invasion--held at gun point and his valuables demanded. Being an old man, he told the crook he had to pee--and the crook let him go to the bathroom (where he had a hidden handgun). Gun battle and struggle ensues. Multiple shots fired. The police seize the old man's gun as evidence--apparently because the crook had at one point in the struggle gained control of it--and still have it years later, as well as another gun in the house at the time. The DA was going to allow the release, but then the crook appealed his sentence--and the guns remain "safely" locked away. How the hell these firearms have evidentiary value makes them necessary to the appellate property confounds my (legal) intellect. Whatever else may be in dispute, the ownership of the guns, or which gun shot which guy, is not. |
November 22, 2013, 11:04 AM | #22 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
November 22, 2013, 04:34 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2009
Posts: 566
|
I should have had this in my earlier post, sorry.
I can understand the police wanting to see some evidence of ownership, but on an item that does not have a title or registration like an automobile, documentation of ownership or transfer seems limited. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am glad that most of my "store bought" firearms came from the same locally-owned shop, so I could have a better chance of tracking down a copy of the 4473 forms. I have one particular pistol that I am very fond of that was purchased from a nearby sporting goods store that has since closed. I doubt it would be so easy to get a copy of the form related to its purchase. |
November 22, 2013, 08:22 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 917
|
Petition the judge who sat the case, and/or file theft against the dept. with the DA
|
November 22, 2013, 08:51 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2011
Posts: 751
|
The gun is part of the cost of court. Carry something you won't cry over.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|