|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 11, 2012, 02:33 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,309
|
Magnum primers in a .44 mag.
I made a mistake the other day. Really surprising, my first ever.
Anyhow, some explanation is in order. I have a sorta visual memory. Back in the early 1980s I communicated with Edward A. Matunas, a well known writer of the day on gun and reloading issues, about some reloading questions. No e-mail or links then. He sent me a handwritten reply which I still have. In another thread I said the use of magnum primers in .44 mag. was never needed. My visual memory tricked me after 30+ years of not reading the letter. Mag. primers are proper to use in the .44 mag. under certain conditions according to Matunas. He said, with full loads of certain powders (2400, 296, 110) mag. primers were just fine. He did admonish that those loads would give higher pressures than with standard primers. So caution and testing are required if one starts using these. In response to a question about light loads using Win. 231, he said mag. primers were "never" to be used. And that is what my memory 'saw'. Looking over my own notes from my days of reloading the .44 mag. I see that I did use mag primers on some heavy thumping max loads with heavier bullets. From other communications and article reading, I found that mag. primers have a place when shooting in extreme cold, like way-way below zero in places like Alaska in the winter. |
December 11, 2012, 02:46 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2009
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,280
|
read a load manual please.
|
December 11, 2012, 02:55 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,309
|
Quote:
|
|
December 11, 2012, 03:49 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Posts: 1,293
|
Mag primers have nothing to do with the caliber and everything to do with the powder.
|
December 11, 2012, 05:25 PM | #5 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
In my experience you only need mag primers with certain hard to light powders like H110/WW296. Those are the only powders I've ever used them for. Standard primers for everything else. You do not need mag primers with any 2400 loads. I've loaded 2400 from too light to too hot and everything inbetween and never felt the need for mag primers with them.
They may be fine with 2400 loads but needed is another story. 2400 is not hard to light. |
December 11, 2012, 06:48 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,341
|
A man of character is not afraid to admit when he is wrong. Now you need to go back to the original thread and tell this to the new reloader.........
|
December 11, 2012, 07:13 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2011
Posts: 177
|
I have a few manuals and they do not specify different primers for different powders.
|
December 11, 2012, 07:47 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2009
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 2,614
|
Certain powers work better with Magnum primers. H-110/296 and IMR 4227 come to mind. Other powders don't seem to care. And still others you get quite a boost. Unique, Universal, and Green Dot for example don't seem to care what primer I used. 2400 it did matter. I'll only use standard primers with 2400 now. All tests I do are done over a chronograph and back to back for same environmental conditions using same batch of brass.
I checked my notes and I never did check W-231 if it was primer sensitive. I suspect it shouldn't care but until I run a test.... YMMV. I just use standard primers with this powder.
__________________
A clinger and deplorable, MAGA, and life NRA member. When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. Single Action .45 Colt (Sometimes colloquially referred to by its alias as the .45 'Long' Colt or .45LC). Don't leave home without it. That said, the .44Spec is right up their too... but the .45 Colt is still the king. |
December 11, 2012, 09:42 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,415
|
Au Contraire
Quote:
|
|
December 12, 2012, 02:17 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2004
Posts: 516
|
Back when I was messing around with such things, I had more unburned powder when the loads were initiated with Std primers, rather than Magnum.
Too many variables such as barrel length and constriction, bullet weight and crimp, or a 'hot' or not load, have a seat at the table. But, 'generally', whoever that General is, in the revolver loads hawked at that time, std primers left more residue. That unburned powder residue got into the parts that revolved and extracted empty cases. That made revolving the revolver more difficult. Powder has changed. That was then, now, I don't know. salty salty
__________________
Bread and Circuses don't pay the Bills. |
December 12, 2012, 02:49 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
|
don't do as I do do as I say. What I say is follow the load manual. In the past when all I could find were magnum primers I have worked up loads using whatever primers were available starting at the minimum safe load of course.
BTW even if all you do is switch brands of the same type primer it would be wise to do a new load workup from the minimum. For that matter if you change case or even switch to a bullet of a different brand but same weight do a new load workup. It is the prudent thing to do http://kwk.us/chronographs.html
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek Last edited by hounddawg; December 12, 2012 at 02:54 PM. |
December 12, 2012, 06:31 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2009
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 2,614
|
Quote:
.45 Colt 8.5g Unique, 255g SWC, CCI-300, 977fps, 17 SD, 56 ES, 15 shots 8.5g Unique, 255g SWC, CCI-350, 985fps, 21 SD, 82 ES, 15 shots or with TB. .44 Spec 5.2g Trail Boss, 255g SWC, CCI-300, 756fps, 12 SD, 57 ES, 30 shots 5.2g Trail Boss, 255g SWC, CCI-350, 765fps, 11 SD, 54 ES, 29 shots Now with TB and the .45 Colt I found under one bullet magnum primers were twice as consistent (half the SD) than the regular primers. Go figure. So sometimes I'll test with both just to see.... If you are working at the 'bleeding' edge definitely back off, say 10-15% and work back up when trying an unknown primer (to you)....
__________________
A clinger and deplorable, MAGA, and life NRA member. When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. Single Action .45 Colt (Sometimes colloquially referred to by its alias as the .45 'Long' Colt or .45LC). Don't leave home without it. That said, the .44Spec is right up their too... but the .45 Colt is still the king. Last edited by rclark; December 12, 2012 at 06:42 PM. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|