|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 24, 2015, 02:34 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 5, 2013
Location: one of the un-free states
Posts: 240
|
Another pros and cons thread: Red dot v. bead on HD pump shotgun
Yet, another decision I'm torn about. I'm considering switching bead on my Mossberg 500 for Aimpoint Micro (let's leave out discussion of price, because, yeah, that thing is ridiculously expensive -- can get 2 mossbeg 500 for one aimpoint micro). I'm talking about home defense only (sorry forgot to specify this in original post). Here're my preliminary thoughts on pluses and minuses of stock bead v. red-dot:
red dot + allows putting stock lower into chest muscle area (and away from collar bone area) when aiming -- which helps mitigate recoil + higher cheek riser (that one would need to compensate for the elevated sights) prevents thumb of rear hand from hitting the face/glasses during recoil (I use the ugly but extremely functional magpul sga stock) + aiming is faster + can keep both eyes open when aiming/firing - need to compensate for the height of the red dot (hits will be 1-2 inches lower than point of aim) -- especially problematic when shooting behind barriers, since shot can hit barrier and not the threat - downsides of all optics (hard recoil can shift point of aim; bolts can loosen up; battery can die; glass can break; added bulk/weight; glass produces reflection, which might give away one's position; etc. etc.) stock bead + very sturdy + no need to compensate for the height of red dot over bore + no need to replace batteries (even when batteries last 5 years) What's your opinion (if price is not an issue)?
__________________
When Darth Vader killed the younglings, did anyone blame the lightsaber??? Last edited by ezmiraldo; April 24, 2015 at 05:07 PM. |
April 24, 2015, 03:09 PM | #2 |
Junior member
Join Date: August 28, 2012
Posts: 240
|
I have a micro red dot on my Mossberg semi (SPX), the red dot sits right atop the front sight so I don't think I lose even a microsecond lining things up once my head hits the cheekpiece. I could easily be wrong as I have not measured it, but I know that at the very least I don't lose anything moving from sunlight to a dim room and shooting.
I suspect that beads work very well, for hunting at least. Not many ducks or geese migrate during the night. |
April 24, 2015, 03:24 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,441
|
Nothing but a simple bead is all that is necessary when pointing a shotgun at a bad guy.
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
April 24, 2015, 03:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
It sounds like this 500 you are talking about is a HD shotgun. If that is correct then I'd say go for the Aimpoint if you want. However, if that shotgun gets used as a game-getter then I'd say pass. The only place in the field that a red dot on a shotgun is actually a help instead of a hinderance is on a turkey shotgun.
|
April 24, 2015, 03:51 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 2012
Location: San Joaquin Valley, Calif.
Posts: 482
|
Whats the target???
__________________
1. The pattern board is your friend, use the Dam thing!!! 2. The maximum range of a firearm and/or cartridge, is usually measured in miles, and means nothing. 2a. The effective range of a firearm and/or cartridge, is usually (the ability of the shooter) measured in yards, and means everything. |
April 24, 2015, 04:40 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: SC
Posts: 1,344
|
I see no use for me to have a red dot on a HD shotgun. Personally I prefer a fiber optic bead or just some glow paint on the factory bead. Its one of those things that to me it makes no sense in complicating a simple solution.
|
April 24, 2015, 05:41 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 2009
Posts: 903
|
I'd stick with a bead as well.
I don't know if I agree with the "pros" about a red dot being faster, and you can/should use a bead with both eyes open too. |
April 24, 2015, 05:55 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,441
|
How is looking at a red dot faster for target acquisition than using your own 2 eyes?
K.I.S.S. is needed here
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
April 24, 2015, 05:56 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 3,047
|
I'd put a Tritium night sight on the front and not have to worry about dead batteries or other malfunctions for the next 15 years.
There will be no difference in target aquisition times nor accuracy fo HD purposes
__________________
One shot, one kill |
April 24, 2015, 06:31 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 10, 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 517
|
You know, I came across an interesting sight the other day while surfing the web. I thought it was a pretty cool design and it might fit your needs.
It is called See All Open Sight . It uses no batteries.. Kind of like a red dot, but not really. It looks pretty robust. Here is the website: https://seeallopensight.com/ Here is a video of a guy reviewing it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_-GPNTxiBo |
April 24, 2015, 07:05 PM | #11 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
You point a bead; You superimpose a RedDot.
Quote:
Looks like you worked hard to come up with these negatives, all of which are minor or non-existent. Of the many RedDot types, I have only had one major problem and that was loosing the internal ground connection. Most folks don't like them because they have never taken the time to work with them. In fact, most of the problems are self-inflicted. ..... How about; Aiming in the dark, with a bead, is non-existing. You learn to point in a general direction and hope you did well. Aiming in the dark with a RedDot, Allows you to superimpose the dot over the target and you know the target is yours. Quote:
I once talked a deer hunter into letting me install a RedDot on his slug-gun. That first year, the rest of the party scoffed at it and he took a buck at 80yds. and hit where he was touching. Do that with a bead. One guy said it was plain luck and he may have been right. .... Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
||
April 24, 2015, 07:21 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,441
|
If you are shooting at bad guys at 80 yards, you're going to jail. The OP is talking about HD use - more like a few yards at most. the added weight and bulk of a Red Dot at HD distances is a waste of money and can throw any semblance of balance or pointability off. At HD distances, it is simply not needed. Buy some ammo and take a lesson with that money instead.
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
April 24, 2015, 08:34 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2012
Location: Williamsburg, Va.
Posts: 1,528
|
I see no use for a red dot for HD, and I have a red dot sight (Burris) and use it for almost everything, including wingshooting. Something else to have to worry about in an emergency, and hope you remembered to turn it off and not kill the battery the last time.
__________________
What could have happened... did. |
April 24, 2015, 09:32 PM | #14 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 3,047
|
Quote:
Quote:
Don't assume that because some aren't suggesting them for this use that they have no experience in using them
__________________
One shot, one kill |
||
April 24, 2015, 10:06 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,441
|
Quote:
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
|
April 24, 2015, 11:19 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2005
Location: Ct.
Posts: 546
|
Seems like the pros in the top tier competitions are all still using beads. I love red dots for 25-100yrd shots. But anything closer I would rather have a bead.
|
April 25, 2015, 04:01 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 3,047
|
Quote:
Not everything takes place in total darkness If it did, the red dot sight wouldn't offer any advantage either Let's stick to realistic scenarios No one should be firing blindly into the darkness
__________________
One shot, one kill |
|
April 25, 2015, 04:53 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 25, 2014
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
|
|
April 25, 2015, 08:35 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Somewhere on the Southern shore of Lake Travis, TX
Posts: 2,603
|
Quote:
__________________
Hanlon's Razor "Do not invoke conspiracy as explanation when ignorance and incompetence will suffice, as conspiracy implies intelligence and organization." |
|
April 25, 2015, 09:10 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,692
|
I imagine shooting a bad guy in the dark is the same as birds on the fly. Look at the bad guy, shoot the bad guy. No use for special gadgets.
Whoever suggested the K.I.S.S method above is right on track. Leave it bead. |
April 25, 2015, 09:26 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 5, 2013
Location: one of the un-free states
Posts: 240
|
I have zero issues shooting w. both eyes open when using pistol with regular sights. And, I can do this fast. However, my shotgun bead makes this extremely difficult (next to impossible, when switching shoulders and firing from the left side, and then switching again back and forth). Perhaps my bead is crappy. Tiny bolts on the receiver that protect the threads of the rail bolt holes are getting in the way, for one thing. Also, I have to lower my head way down to see the sights, which is uncomfortable, reduces my field of view and makes shooting w. prescription glasses difficult. Do you guys experience any of these issues? Some suggest bringing the stock of the gun up (instead of lowering the head down) -- I don't like that idea because then only part of gun stock is in contact with the body, and the main contact occurs with the color bone. This, imo, isn't an optimal recoil-mitigation approach... Having taken professional classes and spending lots of time dry and live firing, it's still not very easy to aim fast and aim accurately even within the 30 feet home defense distance (it is doable to take a head shot w. a slug from that distance, but I want it to be easier/faster).
I also think that Aimpoint Micro follows the KISS principle: You can leave it on for 5 years without changing batteries (change 'em when new president is elected, and you'll be fine); it is very compact, light, and sturdy -- so shouldn't break or get in the way much, if at all. It ain't as KISSish as the bead, but it's pretty darn close, imo
__________________
When Darth Vader killed the younglings, did anyone blame the lightsaber??? Last edited by ezmiraldo; April 25, 2015 at 10:13 AM. |
April 25, 2015, 09:53 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 25, 2014
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
|
|
April 25, 2015, 10:09 AM | #23 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: August 28, 2012
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
Quote:
A good possibility exists that the pattern would be somewhat smaller at 30'; the longest single sight line in my house. As for shouldering to opposite sides, I wonder if it may not be because hanging both shoulders out in the hallway instead of just one might not increase the chances of getting shot. |
||
April 25, 2015, 10:31 AM | #24 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
There are always options
Quote:
It was obvious from the start, that the OP leaning toward the RedDot and just needed some input. As usual, I try to address the OP's question and concerns and not Hi-Jack a post or be prejudice in my response. Personally, I would not mount a RedDot on a HD shotgun but I would also not excluded as anyone's option. .... Quote:
Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
||
April 25, 2015, 10:37 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 2009
Posts: 903
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|