|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 13, 2018, 11:16 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2009
Posts: 180
|
Mark:
That SPC chart probably would have looked much better had the numbers been fed into a SPC program which would have set the chart not as every thou tenth but something that would not have displayed the missing numbers slots. Very interesting chat though. I've plotted quite a few boxes of loaded rounds, both factory & homegrown, empty cases & projectiles & my charts came out very similar to yours (missing slots). Last edited by Gary Wells; September 15, 2018 at 12:04 PM. |
September 14, 2018, 05:33 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Somewhere on the Southern shore of Lake Travis, TX
Posts: 2,603
|
If you really want to have fun with statistics, shoot a shotgun at a patterning board and then plot the x and y axis positions of the hits and see if you don't come up with a two dimensional bell curve.
When you shoot a rifle at a target hundreds of times, the hits should look like a very tight shotgun pattern and should form a two dimensional bell curve. The more accurate the rifle, the sharper the peak.
__________________
Hanlon's Razor "Do not invoke conspiracy as explanation when ignorance and incompetence will suffice, as conspiracy implies intelligence and organization." |
September 14, 2018, 07:57 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 988
|
Nothing to apologize for.
When we load ammo, we work for consistency. Bullet weight is simply one of those variables. Powder weight, powder volume, case volume, case length, primer quality, COL, etc. We control the variables we can control. There are plenty of other variables we are NOT able to control. As a result, velocities right out of the barrel tend to be inconsistent in spite of our best efforts to control everything else. With inconsistent velocities, we have other inconsistencies beyond our control. It's overwhelming, to be sure. If you can, create charts for everything else we try to do when loading. See how that works when you get to the range. (I expect it will work quite well, actually.) If we reduce loading to a math problem, the variances might make it too overwhelming to even give it a try. Nevertheless, when we're hunting or shooting holes in paper, we really do quite well, all things considered. I like your chart out of curiosity, however, it doesn't exactly solve all of the issues we have when loading and shooting. It's a prime example of how a paper problem may not exactly translate to a real life solution. Carry on. It's a good way to think about it. --Wag--
__________________
"Great genius will always encounter fierce opposition from mediocre minds." --Albert Einstein. |
September 15, 2018, 10:21 AM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
|
Quote:
|
|
September 15, 2018, 10:46 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,308
|
This post tells me one thing for sure...don't buy Everglades bullets.
But in reality, it is the stacking of the variables that affects reloaded ammo the most. One set can have some variation and you can still get acceptable groups, especially if you are in a node. But take the heavy bullet with the low powder charge and weak ignition in the higher case volume compared to the light bullet with the high powder charge and strong ignition in the smaller case volume and you have a higher chance of having a higher Extreme spread. What would actually be valuable is knowing what bullet weights and case weights can be discarded and which can be used (variables we can measure pre-assembly) to keep the SD within single digits. When I load for my precision rifles, that is something I look at. For pistol rounds, I just buy bullets that don't have a large variation like the OPs sample. |
September 15, 2018, 03:05 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2014
Location: Nevada/Ariz/CA
Posts: 1,753
|
I might also ask what the point is for the SD post. For a more practical answer, I would suggest that the OP divide the bullets into three groups, the lightest third, the middle third, and the heavist, load them all the same, and bench rest a sample from each group at some nominal distance, to determine if the results show any real difference in group size and point of impact. If so, the post could be more meaningful, but one such sampling may not prove anything due to factors other than .2 gr extreme spread entering the exercise.
__________________
Ouch, the dreaded "M-1 thumb", you just know it will happen eventually, so why not do it now and get it over with?? |
September 15, 2018, 04:22 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
|
I did that one time, light, middle, and heavy, plus random.
The random draw out of the box shot the most accurately from Ransom Rest. I quit worrying about bullet variation at pistol ranges. |
September 15, 2018, 04:42 PM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2018
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
So I decided to do more research...are these outlier bullets acceptable? When does a bullet become unacceptable? I downloaded the SAAMI spec manual to find the answer. As it turns out...Everglades Ammo advertising was spot on...these are truly SAAMI spec bullets. For 100gr and heavier lead core bullets, nominal weight +/- 1.5% is acceptable. For 115gr bullets, this means 113.275 to 116.725gr will pass the test. https://saami.org/wp-content/uploads...MI_CFPandR.pdf Page 73 (82), of the document. |
|
September 15, 2018, 05:22 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2009
Posts: 180
|
mark6754:
Are you open to suggestions? I liked your thread and the info that it contained. I hope that you will continue to post up data like that. Regardless of the neessity, there's always somebody looking for that data, maybe not today, but tomorrow. You might want to look up JayhawkNave02 over on 1911Forum & Bullseye-l-Forum. He puts up his charts on Excel. |
September 15, 2018, 08:12 PM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,568
|
Quote:
|
|
September 15, 2018, 11:13 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,876
|
Quote:
Interesting you guys are talking about Everglades bullets . I just came across there website a few months ago and bought 2k of there 158gr 38/357 JHP bullets . They're HP but also SP as well , they are more like a semi jacketed HP with the top 1/3 to 1/4 of the bullet being exposed lead . They came a little dinged up on the edges of the tip but when I seat them my seating stem smashes all the burrs down and they end up looking pretty good loaded . They came in 250ct bags . I'll have to weigh all the bullets in one bag and see what kind of variance I get .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive ! I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . |
|
September 15, 2018, 11:58 PM | #37 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 9, 2018
Posts: 9
|
I see similar results with cast handgun bullets, but not with higher end plated pistol or any rifle (mostly buy Sierra and Berger). Could care less about the differences on the handgun side and I suspect the manufactures feel the same way since what you found is not uncommon.
Something to chew on... Small changes in weight does not translate to differences in BC unless you are passing certain velocities (velocity barriers vary by bullet). Where the extra material is may or may not change pressure. Fatter may (tight), below the ogive may (less volume), above the ogive won't unless you are not seating by measuring ogive else it may because you are changing volume. Pressure differences from volume or neck tension will impact accuracy long before small variations in bullet weight, as will variances in powder charge (that +/-0.1 is a big deal) at 100 - 200 meters, and 1 kernel is a big deal above 500 meters. If you load rifle and you find your ogive measurement varies from one round to the next, it is most likely attributed to differences in neck tension from one piece of brass to the next. Microscopic burrs around the mouth, inconsistent annealing, and carbon build up (or lack of any carbon) are common reasons for different neck tension. Point is, far more things are going to mess up your game before small changes in bullet weight.
__________________
I am human therefore I own a bullet puller. |
September 17, 2018, 10:03 AM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 923
|
I don't think you have a big problem, even though it is good data.
From what I can estimate, a change in 0.5 grains for a 115 grain bullet would result in a 2.6 fps change or 0.2% variation in velocity. Most ammo loads vary at least twice that according to my chronograph using high quality match ammo. If you are using a very accurate scale, a 0.1 grain variation in Bullseye powder would create 10X that change. |
September 17, 2018, 10:33 AM | #39 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,523
|
Nice work Markr6754. This is the kind of stuff that makes TFL so educational.
Sorry I was late to the party. Quote:
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
|
September 18, 2018, 09:44 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 18, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 562
|
ED tells you something about the sample. Assuming a normal distribution, SD tells you something about the population.
Put a different way, ED tells you something about the rounds you have already fired; SD tells you something about the rounds you'll fire in the future. A separate point: SD has units; in the case of Chrono results, the unit is fps. So a given SD could be excellent for a higher velocity round and lousy for a lower velocity round. If you divide SD by Mean, you get Coefficient of Variability, a unitless percentage. This enables comparison between or among different calibers or loads. |
September 18, 2018, 09:52 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,876
|
Who's Ed and who invited him to this party
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive ! I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . |
September 19, 2018, 06:59 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2010
Posts: 1,025
|
I think somebody is confusing ED with ES. Which could be life changing on multiple levels.
|
|
|