The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 8, 2013, 11:08 AM   #1
win-lose
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 3, 2009
Posts: 509
Rules of Engagement - Integrity, Civility and Discipline.

Rules of Engagement - Integrity, Civility and Discipline.

This is the only way we are going to stand a chance at retaining our rights as our Country continues its shift. We are completely out "gunned" in terms of media messaging. Our opposition is a lot more clever, well organized and well funded than most dare admit (see last election if in doubt).

I watched Piers Morgan last night and couldn't sleep very well after (good thread describing here). I believe this type of presentation will be their playbook going forward.

1 - Attempt to demonstrate the existence of a crisis: They will parade around the poor people who suffered through unspeakable horrors. They will string multiple horrific events together into very large segments to make the sum greater than its parts. They will cherry pick statistics without context.

2 - Attempt to discredit the opposition and therefore their position: They will parade loon after loon and call them the base of the opposition. They will again, cherry pick their statistics without context.

3 - They will make the choice stark. "Either you are for children's safety or against it."

Our messages will be small in number and limited in distribution. Therefore, we must make them count. We must appeal to intellect and dissuade emotion.

Vocabulary - we can not allow the acceptance of the oppositions language. Words like "epidemic", "crisis" and phrases like "common sense" must be challenged with clarity of reason and sensitivity to those who have suffered. Our language must be clear, without ambiguity and fully aligned to our message/postion.

Statistics/Studies/Events - we must present our positions with evidence that can not be easily refuted. When cherry picked statistics are presented against us, we need to clearly paint them in the larger statistical context. For example: When country "A" banned guns, gun violence went down 70%. Response: That is interesting, however you neglected to mention that violent crime as whole went up 50%, so clearly the void of guns was filled with other weapons and the criminals having less to fear were actually enabled by the disarming of the law abiding citizen population."

Position - we must have a clearly defined, consistent and well reasoned position. For example, If we say that we need to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals and the mentally unfit, then we must allow for background checks on all legal firearm transfers. We can not allow flawed logic to undermine our position. Our position must be intellectually defensible.

I believe that we will need to very quickly organize and solidify a plan of position/evidence/presentation that uses integrity, civility and discipline as the governing rules of engagement. Anything else will be leveraged against us.

Regards to All
win-lose is offline  
Old January 8, 2013, 11:39 AM   #2
vossman
Member
 
Join Date: November 27, 2010
Posts: 25
Well put Sir.
vossman is offline  
Old January 8, 2013, 02:04 PM   #3
Tom68
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 20, 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 349
I would also add that we must separate ourselves from those elements within our ranks who refuse to act/speak in a civil manner. As you stated, they will parade out the biggest malcontents from the "gun crowd" and paint them as representative of our cause.
Tom68 is offline  
Old January 8, 2013, 06:50 PM   #4
MTHall720
Member
 
Join Date: November 7, 2012
Location: Central Maryland
Posts: 58
Well said indeed
MTHall720 is offline  
Old January 8, 2013, 07:06 PM   #5
globemaster3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 28, 2006
Posts: 1,482
Well put.

I would also add that we need a list of verified, credible, reference-able, statistics to work with in these counter arguments. Surely someone out there has some quality studies we can quote.

And as mentioned, those overseas 2nd and 3rd order effects to gun bans/confiscations are particularly relevant.
globemaster3 is offline  
Old January 8, 2013, 07:26 PM   #6
coachteet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 7, 2008
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 122
www.nraila.org is an excellent source for arming yourself with knowledge.

Specifically, look here: http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/fact-sheets.aspx

Last edited by coachteet; January 8, 2013 at 07:32 PM. Reason: Added website
coachteet is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05680 seconds with 10 queries