The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 19, 2020, 04:37 PM   #1
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Parallax Adjustment?

When did folks start calling the process of adjusting a scope sight objective lens system to focus on a distant range or target to "parallax adjustment?"

Especially when the aiming eye is on the scope optical axis, there's no parallax to adjust regardless of what range the objective lens system is focused at.

Last edited by Bart B.; September 19, 2020 at 04:48 PM.
Bart B. is offline  
Old September 19, 2020, 06:09 PM   #2
LeverGunFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 405
I have a Redfield 4x12 rifle scope and instruction book from about 1973 and it uses the term parallax adjustment, so the that term has been in use for at least 50 years.
__________________
Support the Second Amendment Foundation and the Firearms Policy Coalition
LeverGunFan is offline  
Old September 19, 2020, 07:44 PM   #3
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
Parallax is a real thing, but very much over stated. I think that what Bart is saying is that many people confuse focusing the scope for adjusting parallax.

For most shooters, at the ranges they shoot parallax is a non issue. Most shooters, and their most rifles aren't accurate enough for it to be a factor. For some elite shooters at extreme ranges maybe.

A quote from Leupold owners manual.

Quote:
parallax occurs when your eye is at the very edge of the exit pupil.(Even in this unlikely event, our 4x hunting scope focused for 150 yards has a maximum error of only 8/10ths of an inch at 500 yards.)At short distances, the parallax effect does not affect accuracy. (Using the same4x scope at 100 yards, the maximum error is less than 2/10ths of an inch.) It is also good to remember that, as long as you are sighting straight through the middle of the scope, or close to it, parallax will have virtually no effect on accuracy in a hunting situation
__________________
"If you're still doing things the same way you were doing them 10 years ago, you're doing it wrong"

Winston Churchill
jmr40 is online now  
Old September 19, 2020, 11:41 PM   #4
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,765
When the image of the target coincides with the reticle, there is no parallax. When did people start calling this parallax adjustment, instead of focusing? No clue. It doesn't matter, does it?

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
tangolima is offline  
Old October 3, 2020, 08:06 AM   #5
std7mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2013
Location: Central Taxylvania..
Posts: 3,609
Paralax, focus.... Whatever you want to call it.
I don't mind the adjustment on the side of the scope too much.
But i hate the adjustable objective out at the end of the scope!
Especially useless for use on a "hunting scope".
__________________
When our own government declares itself as "tyrannical", where does that leave us??!!

"Januarary 6th insurrection".
Funny, I didn't see a single piece of rope...
std7mag is offline  
Old October 4, 2020, 09:44 AM   #6
zukiphile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmr40
Parallax is a real thing, but very much over stated. I think that what Bart is saying is that many people confuse focusing the scope for adjusting parallax.
I'm not sure that I've read anyone confusing the two; on the contrary this subject seems to show up mostly when a scope is correctly adjusted for parallax at a specific distance but the target isn't in sharp focus. The scope gives correct focus or parallax adjustment, but not both at the same time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmr40
For most shooters, at the ranges they shoot parallax is a non issue. Most shooters, and their most rifles aren't accurate enough for it to be a factor. For some elite shooters at extreme ranges maybe.
Parallax is a big deal at short ranges, so rimfire and airgun shooters deal with it a lot. Quite a few scopes have parallax set at 100 yards; using one of those at 30m will show a substantial parallax shift with head movement.
zukiphile is offline  
Old October 4, 2020, 10:18 AM   #7
Pahoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
Nothing new, just effects scopes/optics

Parallax is an optical effect and has been around longer than rifle scopes. It's effect is present, in many optics/sights. I first encountered this term while involved with the reading of instruments and a common term, was Parallax-Error. It's real and been around for as long as we have been on this earth.. ..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax

Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing.
Pahoo is offline  
Old October 4, 2020, 02:37 PM   #8
Double K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2020
Location: Colorado
Posts: 486
What Zukiphile said and it's a pretty big deal with any scope in my opinion unless your just a casual shooter.
I've seen many a scope that had a couple of inches of parallax at 200yds when the objective was set in focus for me and I have 20/20 vision. Add that to typical group size error of .75 moa and your gun is a 3.5 gun at 200yds, 7moa at 400yds before factoring in any vertical stringing.
Double K is offline  
Old October 4, 2020, 03:17 PM   #9
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double K View Post
I've seen many a scope that had a couple of inches of parallax at 200yds when the objective was set in focus for me and I have 20/20 vision.
That happens when the scope's eyepiece is set to focus your vision in front of or behind the reticle and the objective lens focuses the target image at that point instead of the reticle.

Adjust the eyepiece to focus your eye on the reticule first, lock the eyepiece in place, then adjust objective lens to focus on target to eliminate parallax at target ranges.

Last edited by Bart B.; October 4, 2020 at 03:43 PM.
Bart B. is offline  
Old October 14, 2020, 10:52 AM   #10
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,765
That's right. The reticle should be in focus always. The target is brought to focus by parallax adjustment. Then the target image coincides with the reticle, and hence no parallax.

Parallax indeed exists everywhere when marker (reticle) is not on the same plane as the scale (target image). There have been a lot of interesting mechanisms to reduce or eliminate parallax.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
tangolima is offline  
Old October 14, 2020, 01:00 PM   #11
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by tangolima View Post
Parallax indeed exists everywhere when marker (reticle) is not on the same plane as the scale (target image).
Except when the aiming eye is on the scope's optical axis.
Bart B. is offline  
Old October 14, 2020, 01:18 PM   #12
Dave P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 1999
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,346
"Except when the aiming eye is on the scope's optical axis."

To me, if I adjust parallax properly, it does really matter if my cheek weld is consistent or not. POI will be the same if my eye is on- axis or off-axis.
__________________
I think this country is screwed.
Dave P is offline  
Old October 14, 2020, 01:34 PM   #13
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave P View Post
"Except when the aiming eye is on the scope's optical axis."

To me, if I adjust parallax properly, it does really matter if my cheek weld is consistent or not. POI will be the same if my eye is on- axis or off-axis.
If you're a good marksman shooting accurate stuff, inconsistent cheek welds will degrade accuracy. The bore axis angle changes while bullets go through it. Inconsistent angles and resistence from recoil axis to center of mass holding the rifle changes where the barrel points when the bullet leaves.

Last edited by Bart B.; October 14, 2020 at 02:46 PM.
Bart B. is offline  
Old October 14, 2020, 05:23 PM   #14
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart B. View Post
Except when the aiming eye is on the scope's optical axis.
That's one of mechanisms to correct parallax. Remember mirror under needle in certain meters.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
tangolima is offline  
Old October 15, 2020, 06:51 AM   #15
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
.... delete

Last edited by Bart B.; October 15, 2020 at 07:03 AM.
Bart B. is offline  
Old October 15, 2020, 09:02 AM   #16
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmr40
Parallax is a real thing, but very much over stated. I think that what Bart is saying is that many people confuse focusing the scope for adjusting parallax.
That may be what Bart thinks people are saying, but the purpose of an AO (Adjustable Objective) scope isn't focus, it's to adjust the zero parallax distance to match the distance you're shooting at. And the reason for doing that, of course, is so that parallax isn't a factor even if your eye isn't directly on the scope axis for every shot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by std7mag
Paralax, focus.... Whatever you want to call it.
I don't mind the adjustment on the side of the scope too much.
But i hate the adjustable objective out at the end of the scope!
No, it's not "whatever you want to call it." Words have meaning. Parallax adjustment is not the same as focus. The adjustable objective that you dislike is for adjusting parallax to zero at the distance you're shooting. If you don't care about that or you dislike it, then don't buy scopes with adjustable objective lenses.
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor
NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO
1911 Certified Armorer
Jeepaholic
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old October 15, 2020, 09:26 AM   #17
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aguila Blanca View Post
That may be what Bart thinks people are saying, but the purpose of an AO (Adjustable Objective) scope isn't focus, it's to adjust the zero parallax distance to match the distance you're shooting at. And the reason for doing that, of course, is so that parallax isn't a factor even if your eye isn't directly on the scope axis for every shot.

No, it's not "whatever you want to call it." Words have meaning. Parallax adjustment is not the same as focus. The adjustable objective that you dislike is for adjusting parallax to zero at the distance you're shooting. If you don't care about that or you dislike it, then don't buy scopes with adjustable objective lenses.
What's the difference between a SLR camera lens focusing a subject on the screen or film and a scope focusing a target on the reticle?

What dimension changes in scope lenses when you adjust parallax with the side knob?

What direction does the scope adjustable objective lens system move when focusing a closer target on the reticle, forward closer to the target or backward further from the target?

Last edited by Bart B.; October 15, 2020 at 10:57 AM.
Bart B. is offline  
Old October 15, 2020, 09:30 AM   #18
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart B. View Post
What's the difference between a SLR camera lens focusing a subject on the screen or film and a scope focusing a target on the reticle?
No difference.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
tangolima is offline  
Old October 15, 2020, 10:57 AM   #19
Double K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2020
Location: Colorado
Posts: 486
I have limited experience with scopes because nearly all the ones I have are LĂ©upolds, lots of older ones mostly VX-3's and VX-2's.
Per the scope instructions I use the eyepiece/ocular lens to focus the reticle so it's sharp and clear while looking at a blank white wall.
Then use the adjustable objective to focus on the target.
Here's where myself as well as other target shooters I've personally known have had trouble, occasionally when the objective is focused at distances inside 100yds{sometimes farther} as is the case in ARA 50/50 and 22 silhouette there is parallax in the scope. To me parallax is having the reticle appear to move on the target when changing head position behind the scope in spite of the reticle and target being in perfect focus.
I as well as others I've shot with have sent the scopes back to Leupold describing the problem and they come back "fixed".
Double K is offline  
Old October 15, 2020, 12:42 PM   #20
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Whomever it was to first put in print that any scope has a parallax adjustment had no idea the confusion it would cause. All that knob on the left side did was move two erector lenses back and forth focussing the first image plane on the reticle. 1st plane image from a fixed objective lens moves back as target gets closer; typically about 2/10th inch going from 1000 yards to 50. An adjustable objective lens needs to move forward that much for the same range change.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US4643542A/en
Bart B. is offline  
Old October 15, 2020, 01:07 PM   #21
LeverGunFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart B. View Post
What's the difference between a SLR camera lens focusing a subject on the screen or film and a scope focusing a target on the reticle?

What dimension changes in scope lenses when you adjust parallax with the side knob?

What direction does the scope adjustable objective lens system move when focusing a closer target on the reticle, forward closer to the target or backward further from the target?
I think what Bart is asking is why we describe one process on rifle scopes as parallax adjustment and describe a very similar (if not identical) process on cameras as simply focusing.

The difference is that rifle scopes are sighting systems and cameras are image recording systems. So the importance of parallax is greater in a sighting system, and image clarity is more important in an image recording system. The terminology used to describe what are two very similar processes reflect the primary goals of each system.

Cameras can have issues with parallax; twin lens reflex (TLR) and rangefinder (RF) cameras have a great deal of parallax and users of those cameras have difficulty composing an image of nearby objects. The single lens reflex (SLR) camera was developed to minimize the effects of parallax by making the imaging axis coincident with the viewing axis. As a result, parallax in a SLR is essentially inconsequential and the discussion of parallax has largely been eliminated from photography.

In a rifle scope, reducing sighting error is important along with a high quality image of the target. So we have a two step process (with adjustable objective/parallax adjustment) to focus the eyepiece on the reticle and then bring the target image into focus on the same plane as the reticle. This gives a sharp image and reduces/eliminates parallax.

On a SLR camera where image quality is paramount, we have a similar two step process. The viewfinder diopter adjustment is used to focus the eye on the focus screen and then the lens is adjusted to bring the image into sharp focus.

The adjustment process for the rifle scope and camera are similar, but the primary goal of the adjustment is different for each system. So we call one "parallax adjustment" and the other "focusing", even though they are essentially optically identical. Adjustable objectives were added to rifle scopes specifically to reduce parallax error, so that's why they were described as parallax adjustment.
__________________
Support the Second Amendment Foundation and the Firearms Policy Coalition
LeverGunFan is offline  
Old October 15, 2020, 01:37 PM   #22
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Adjustable objectives in scopes were first used over a century ago to focus targets on the reticle. With both target and reticle well defined, better accuracy was possible. Binoculars and some spotting scopes work the same way except their rear lenses move back and forth.

The parallax adjustment syndrome started when the distance focus knob was first used a few dozen years ago. Shame on whomever it was.

Last edited by Bart B.; October 15, 2020 at 01:44 PM.
Bart B. is offline  
Old October 15, 2020, 02:20 PM   #23
LeverGunFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart B. View Post
Adjustable objectives in scopes were first used over a century ago to focus targets on the reticle. With both target and reticle well defined, better accuracy was possible. Binoculars and some spotting scopes work the same way except their rear lenses move back and forth.

The parallax adjustment syndrome started when the distance focus knob was first used a few dozen years ago. Shame on whomever it was.
To clarify, the confusion you cite is only with the fixed objective/internal focus rifle scopes? Those with side focus/parallax adjustment knobs?
__________________
Support the Second Amendment Foundation and the Firearms Policy Coalition

Last edited by LeverGunFan; October 15, 2020 at 02:26 PM.
LeverGunFan is offline  
Old October 15, 2020, 04:03 PM   #24
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeverGunFan View Post
To clarify, the confusion you cite is only with the fixed objective/internal focus rifle scopes? Those with side focus/parallax adjustment knobs?
Yes. Internal focus (adjustment) is a good term. The first image plane is further back for closer targets. Therefore, you have to focus it in the second image plane at the reticle by moving the erector lenses.

Last edited by Bart B.; October 15, 2020 at 05:36 PM.
Bart B. is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09924 seconds with 8 queries