|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 24, 2013, 10:00 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
|
First Colt...couple of questions...UPDATED PICS
I picked up my first colt today in a trade. It was sort of a whim trade, which is unusual for me. Honestly I am happy with the trade regardless of money. I traded a CZ Rami that was in great condition I just never shot it much. Never quite warmed up to it. I always wanted a colt revolver, but I am more familiar with their Single Action.
First thing I want to ask is how do I tell if the grips are real mother of pearl? When I saw the picture of the gun I assumed they were fake, but after meeting the guy (he wasn't sure) they don't look "plastic" to me. They have a rainbow like sheen when held just right. Second question is, how good of a gun is this? It is a detective special in 38 sp. I am familiar with the name, but do not really know much about them. Gunbroker shows the values running from $400 to $1200 on detective specials, so i really don't know where to begin. It is in what I would consider good shape. one big scratch on the front of the trigger guard that runs onto the right side. Another small mark under the barrel. The rest of it seems to be good. The nickel is in good shape everywhere else. Most importantly the lockup is tight and the bore is good. So what do I have and how did I do? Here are some crappy cellphone pics. I paid $540 for the CZ new a couple of years ago. I am not really sure what they bring used. ETA the serial # is 41xxxx
__________________
Find out just how tall I am By jumping in the middle of a river Last edited by TennJed; January 26, 2013 at 12:45 AM. |
January 26, 2013, 12:42 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
|
Ok maybe this pics will turn out better. Any help in determining if the finish is original would be apprciated. The frist two are the best representation of the color hue. It has a bronze like sheen to it. The 3rd pic shows the big bad spot in the finish
__________________
Find out just how tall I am By jumping in the middle of a river |
January 26, 2013, 12:43 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
|
__________________
Find out just how tall I am By jumping in the middle of a river |
January 27, 2013, 07:15 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 7, 2008
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 451
|
Hard to go wrong with a Detective. One of, if not THE, best snub nosed revolvers EVER made. Hard to tell if your stocks are real MOP or not from the pix. Real MOP will feel gritty if you rub it across your teeth. Most plastic knockoffs will feel smooth. If they ARE real MOPs you should be aware that MOP stocks tend to be a bit fragile and are easily broken. For shooting purposes I'd pick up a cheap pair of rubber stocks and put the mops away for safe keeping, then I'd shoot the heck out of that FINE revolver.
__________________
Mark Lane to William Buckley: "Have you ever referred to Jessee Jackson as an ignoramus?" Buckley: "If I didn't, I should have" |
August 1, 2013, 11:35 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
|
First Colt...couple of questions
I apologize if bumping a 7 month old thread of mine is inappropriate, but a question came up about this gun and I am looking for some help.
Since these are original real MOP grips, it Looks like I will be taking the pearl grips off before I shoot it. Are all Detective grips interchangeable? What is the best way to make sure I get grips that fit to replace these? |
August 2, 2013, 09:25 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Quote:
http://www.eaglegrips.com/guns/Secre...ame-Grips.html Also, if you want to double check your serial number for year of manufacture, you can do so here: http://www.proofhouse.com Last edited by Webleymkv; August 2, 2013 at 09:35 AM. |
|
August 2, 2013, 08:38 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 28, 2006
Posts: 400
|
Seeing as how these few sweet hours are all we have of this world, live high. Leave the pearlies on and shoot with style.
|
August 3, 2013, 08:00 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 14, 2011
Location: Brazos County, Texas
Posts: 1,038
|
That's a great deal! The grips alone are worth almost as much as you paid for the pistol.
But remember it's a Colt,so if you shoot it, it's going to break, and Colt can't fix their double action revolvers anymore! lol |
August 5, 2013, 12:40 PM | #9 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
I am not sure about the grips but the nickel plating does not appear to be original. Some of the photos show a dimpling that would not be there in a factory nickel finish. That is usually a sign of nickel plating over areas where rust has been removed chemically; the right side appears smooth, possibly because the gun had been rusted on only one side. Note that a refinish likely will not affect the safety or function of the gun in any way; it will affect the value on resale.
Jim |
August 5, 2013, 01:29 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 11, 2012
Location: Wendell, N.C.
Posts: 189
|
You are probably correct on the refinish but what I thought when I saw it was, "that one was carried a lot in a pocket with keys, change, etc. and no holster".
|
August 5, 2013, 01:29 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
|
First Colt...couple of questions
Quote:
|
|
August 5, 2013, 08:45 PM | #12 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
All the pictures show some of it; the only area where it is not visible is the smooth right side of the frame in picture #3. Even in that picture, the cylinder shows the markings, and they even extend to the sides of the hammer and trigger. I can't say that it is plating over a rusted area as opposed to something else (like the keys mentioned) without looking at the gun itself, but it does show quite clearly in the pictures and indicates that the gun is not as it came from the factory.
Jim |
August 5, 2013, 09:18 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
|
Thanks Jim. I am going to try and maybe post some better pics. My wife has a decent camera. To my untrained eye, in person, it seems that they are more of scratches than dimples. I did have someone comment that the Horse emblem did not seem to be refinished and the screws/pins don't either, but I honestly don't know and respect opinions like yours
As far as the Grips go, I have had them looked at by a number of people and after doing some of my own homework, I have no doubt they are real MOP
__________________
Find out just how tall I am By jumping in the middle of a river |
August 5, 2013, 09:54 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
|
Better pics
__________________
Find out just how tall I am By jumping in the middle of a river |
August 5, 2013, 10:00 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
|
__________________
Find out just how tall I am By jumping in the middle of a river Last edited by TennJed; August 6, 2013 at 12:10 AM. |
August 6, 2013, 08:13 PM | #16 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Look at #14, third picture. See how the crane is rounded at the front and how the bottom of the frame window toward the front is rounded and does not continue the line of the sideplate? Both are signs of buffing and would NOT be present on a factory nickel gun.
If you were to get a Colt letter, I would make a small wager that that gun left the factory with a blue finish. Somewhere along the way it was rusted, then polished down, with maybe a chemical used, and nickel plated. The gun may be pretty, but if you consider you paid over $500 for it (in trade), IMHO it is worth considerably less. Jim |
August 6, 2013, 09:20 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
|
First Colt...couple of questions
Quote:
|
|
August 9, 2013, 01:59 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
|
Great pics.
I wish I owned that Colt. I see them at shows and pawn shops. The price is always sky high.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought? |
August 9, 2013, 02:26 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
Quote:
|
|
August 9, 2013, 03:42 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
|
Spacecoast,
I have bought 20 Colts this year, 8 semi auto and 12 revolvers. They are all doing well, slathered in Balistol. You are thinking of the half dozen Police Pos 38 sp revolvers I got for $80 ea as police surplus from AIM over 10 years ago for destructive test. I was forced to take engineering ethics in 1976 from an old ME prof that said if the rocket blows up on the launch pad we don't learn much. When I do a test I have some idea of what it will cost and what can be learned. I have shared some of that information on the internet, for free.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought? |
August 9, 2013, 07:00 PM | #21 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
I don't feel qualified to evaluate MOP grips; I think some others may do so, though.
Jim |
|
|