October 18, 2020, 04:43 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: April 23, 2011
Location: Placer Co, CA
Posts: 47
|
45 acp brass sizing
After resizing & loading 45 ACP, my measurement @ mouth (light taper) is .471(manual states .473). Measurement just forward of head is .473 (manual states .476). Brass is mixed-stamp range pick-up. Is there a problem, or am I just being OCD?
Foster CO-Ax press; RCBS carbide die. Appreciate advice.
__________________
The best safety is between your ears. bjm42 |
October 18, 2020, 04:47 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 14, 2017
Location: Finger Lakes Region of NY
Posts: 1,442
|
If it feeds, no problem. Personally, I crimp even a little more (.469 - .470").
Don
__________________
NRA Life Member NRA Certified Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor |
October 18, 2020, 04:54 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,511
|
I don't know that I have ever measured my 45ACP handloaded ammo at the case mouth. I'm not that OCD . If your ammo is "plunking" (dropping freely) into your firearm's chamber without resistance; and your bullets are being held firm, you should be good to go. I would caution over-thinking this.
45ACP was the first non-revolver chambering I ever loaded (late 1984). There was no interweb and I'm not so sure I read the chapter on taper crimping (I likely didn't). I didn't even know there was a difference between taper and roll crimping; yet somehow, I managed to swerve into doing it right. Point is, getting the crimp right on 45ACP must be easy because I'm not that lucky.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
October 18, 2020, 05:37 PM | #4 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,018
|
bmj42,
The way SAAMI gives dimensions is with unilateral tolerances, so the number you see published is actually at one end of the range of values considered acceptable. For 45 Auto the number is 0.473" with a tolerance of -0.006", so the actual range is 0.467" to 0.473". The average is 0.470". So, if you aim at 0.470" you are in the middle of the range and that gives you the most room to err in either direction due to bullet tolerances or different cases having different neck wall thicknesses, etc.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
October 18, 2020, 08:17 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
|
I've been using .468" crimp for years with highly reliable cycling...
Bayou
__________________
Bayou NRA Life Member "Keep Calm and Reload" |
October 18, 2020, 11:06 PM | #6 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,675
|
Quote:
When you see only one number given as the dimension, assume it is the maximum.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
October 19, 2020, 12:37 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: April 23, 2011
Location: Placer Co, CA
Posts: 47
|
Sizing 45 ACP brass
I appreciate the guidance.... No more worries
__________________
The best safety is between your ears. bjm42 |
October 19, 2020, 01:07 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
The manual gives you the SAAMI max dimension. Yours may be smaller, but shouldn't be bigger.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
October 19, 2020, 02:03 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Willamina, OR
Posts: 1,908
|
Some brass is thicker than others and that could be leading to your concern. It's been awhile but I seem to recall that Remington brass was on the thin side..
Tony |
October 19, 2020, 09:08 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,511
|
When I was new to loading, I measured a half-dozen factory rounds, commercial and G.I., and the average was .473", so I started there.
Ultimately, I settled on .470", as every round plunked and fed in every gun. If you have a single .45, you could tailor OAL and crimp for that gun.
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong. |
October 19, 2020, 03:28 PM | #11 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,018
|
Quote:
The origin of the above is what is called a critical dimension. This is generally a number at one end of the acceptable range of a dimension for which going outside it (greater or smaller, depending which sex a part has) will prevent the assembly of a mechanism. So, if a cartridge (male) is too big for a chamber that meets dimensional standards, it won't allow you to close the gun (the final assembling of the working mechanism), and so the critical cartridge dimensions are maximums. If a chamber (female) is too small, a cartridge that meets dimensional standards won't fit inside, again preventing closing the gun for operation, so the critical chamber dimension is a minimum. The only clue the drawings give you that you are dealing with a critical dimension is the tolerance is unilatereal (in one direction only) instead of the familiar plus or minus. The convention with a critical dimension is to provide the critical limit and provide the tolerance only in the other direction.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
|
October 19, 2020, 08:26 PM | #12 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
|
Quote:
I have a running argument with a friend who persists in citing M1911A1 mid-range dimensions as if they are the optimum. I maintain the stated dimensions are the optimum, and the mid-range dimensions just represent a part (or a gun, if everything is made to mid-range dimensions -- which is what he does with his sketches) that's pretty much okay and not in danger of wearing out of spec the first time you shoot it. http://www.sightm1911.com/blueprint/m1911a1_blue.pdf
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO 1911 Certified Armorer Jeepaholic |
|
October 19, 2020, 09:05 PM | #13 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,018
|
Yep. If you want a nice tight gun, you want everything on those critical values. The only exception is keeping your cartridges small enough to feed reliably.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
October 19, 2020, 10:28 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,415
|
In the 50 years I've been loading, I've never mixed cases because of the significant difference in dimensions. There is enough variance in one brand that has kept me away from mixing.
__________________
Reloading For: 223R, 243W, 6.5 GR, 6.5 CM, 260R, 6.5-06, 280R, 7mmRM, 300HAM'R, 308W, 30-06, 338-06, 9mm, 357M, 41M, 44SPL, 44M, 45 ACP, 45 Colt, 450BM. |
October 19, 2020, 11:50 PM | #15 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
|
Quote:
If I were shooting benchrest competition or NRA Bullseye, I'd be picky about mixed brass. For IDPA blaster fodder that's going to be mostly lost to me after the match ... I'm not picky. In fact, I save my Winchester brass for ammo I care about, and I use everything else for the IDPA blaster fodder.
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO 1911 Certified Armorer Jeepaholic |
|
October 20, 2020, 02:09 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2007
Location: Between CA and NM
Posts: 856
|
You are OCD. Sizing dies are made to ensure even cases with the thinnest case walls are sized down enough. Expander dies are designed up increase the case ID, over the range of bullet seating, to be 0.001-0.002" SMALLER than the actual bullet diameter.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|