March 28, 2017, 12:00 PM | #1 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 31, 2014
Location: Northwest Wisconsin
Posts: 285
|
The Ruger Mark IV
Well, the Ruger Mark IV was announced around 6 months ago, and it has captured much more interest than I expected. The first three versions out were the Mark IV Hunter version with 6 7/8 inch fluted barrel, the Mark IV Stainless in 5 ½ Bull Barrel Target, and then the Mark IV Blue with the aluminum grip frame 5 ½ Bull Barrel Target.
Then Davidson's in Prescott, AZ ordered 1,000 of the William B. Ruger 100th Anniversary version to be made by Ruger, which included a knife and sheath. This version has the Competition Target with the slab-side barrel. I really wanted one of those, but all 1,000 were allocated just a few days after they were announced. Normally, when a distributor model run expires, Ruger will then produce that same version in the plain-jane production version, which they have recently done. I was immediately on the phone and had one delivered the same week. This is a very solid pistol and the method involved with removing the upper from the grip frame is so dang easy, even a "caveman" could do it. I've had this pistol apart, I mean completely apart, and the internals are so clean, without burrs of any sort that it's refreshing to see that attention to detail once again from Ruger concerning these Ruger Mark pistols. I haven't shot it yet 'cause I'm still measuring and comparing some of the aftermarket parts from the Ruger Mark II & III to see if/how they might work with this version. I do have an accuracy test in mind using my Ransom Rest just to see how this new pistol compares to the Ruger Mark II Competition Target, A Ruger Mark II Government version, and then just for giggles, a Browning Buckmark Contour with the 7 ¼ stainless steel upper. Just waiting for some warmer weather. |
March 28, 2017, 12:18 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
|
After the Mark III anything would be easy to take apart and put back together....
|
March 28, 2017, 01:39 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
|
Quote:
But I do read instructions. |
|
March 28, 2017, 03:55 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
|
Oh, I read the instructions...... many times. The turning, twisting, etc. we're just too onerous for my liking. One wrong move and start all over.... no thanks.
|
March 28, 2017, 04:04 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,292
|
Ruger Mark whatevers. Probably my favorite .22LR semi-auto. Looking forward to you range report.
|
March 29, 2017, 10:56 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: March 29, 2017
Posts: 80
|
Mark 4 or 3, which to keep in production?
I have owned a Mk. 2 bull barrel in blue (sold it years ago), and now a Mk. 3 also same configuration. I have had the Mk. 3 apart 2 times, takes technique to reassemble. The Mk. 4 looks tempting though.
I generally have no need to take my Mk. 3 apart regularly with general oiling, but some people take their guns apart after every trip to the range. I wonder if Ruger will discontinue the Mk. 3 over keeping the Mk. 4 in production instead? |
March 29, 2017, 11:28 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2006
Location: Surprise, Az.
Posts: 766
|
Ruger has discontinued the Mark III. I have no problem taking mine apart for cleaning after each range session, but now with the Mark IV it's just too easy not to clean it after every outing.
|
March 31, 2017, 07:39 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Fairbanksan in exile to Aleutian Hell
Posts: 2,655
|
The fact that it has an ambidextrous safety to accommodate us left-handers is it's biggest selling point.
I'm hoping they do a regular .22/45 version of the Mk IV.
__________________
Stop Allowing Our Schools To Be Soft Targets! http://fastersaveslives.org/ East Moose. Wear Wolf. |
March 31, 2017, 04:20 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: May 5, 2011
Location: S FL
Posts: 59
|
I am "assuming" that the M4 4 uses the same mags as the earlier MK's
|
March 31, 2017, 04:46 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 15, 2015
Posts: 379
|
I have several Ruger Mark pistols and still have my Mark I from 1969 and it runs perfectly, very accurate. I've never had an issue with disassembly or reassembly but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express before I tried.
|
March 31, 2017, 04:51 PM | #11 |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
I am impressed.
|
April 2, 2017, 07:56 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: December 30, 2006
Posts: 90
|
Mk4 Hunter in lay-away
Like the title says I have a stainless mk 4 Hunter in lay-away to got along with my Gp100 10-shot 22- Looking forward to getting out the Mk4- Hunter to play with.....
|
April 4, 2017, 12:23 PM | #13 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 31, 2014
Location: Northwest Wisconsin
Posts: 285
|
Concerning which magazines the new Ruger Mark IV will be using. Exact same as the Ruger Mark III, steel grip frame.
As was stated above, the Ruger Mark III is no longer in production. I think anybody can overcome the routine involved with the Ruger Mark III take-down and then reassembly, if they want to bad enough. The worst part involved with that rigmarole is the magazine in/magazine out part that's involved with the magazine disco. If one takes those parts out and replaces 'em with a GOOD, solid fitting, hammer bushing the magazines click into place much more positively and come flying out of the grip frame when the latch/release is pushed. The Mark IV no longer has that cut-out in the left side of the receiver for the Loaded Chamber Indicator. I'm betting every single visitor here has been schooled to look in the chamber before anything else when you pick up ANY firearm to see if it's loaded. Really don't need some gimmick to foster laziness. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|