The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 12, 2011, 09:22 PM   #1
PitBull
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 124
Mossberg 590A1 ghost ring issues

Got a question for you experienced Mossberg 590 ghost ring users.

I have a 590A1 that I bought used a few weeks ago. Today I shot some slugs though it off of the bench just to get the sights adjusted for them.
Even at 25 yards I had to have the elevation adjusted almost all the way to the highest setting to get it in the 10 ring at that distance. The slugs were Brenneke KO.
I have rifles with aperture sights so I know what the sight picture is supposed to be. I had the top of the front sight right on the 10 ring. I could get some other slugs and try them but I can't see them making that much of a difference.

Is this problem familiar to anyone?
PitBull is offline  
Old February 12, 2011, 09:33 PM   #2
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
I bought a half-dozen 590-A1's for a little Sheriff's Dept., 20 years ago, and spent an afternoon zeroing them at 50 yards with 2 3/4" Super X slugs. As I recall, nearly all of them required at least half of the elevation adjustment to get them 'on'. All of them did zero, however.

Sounds like Mossberg is still using plenty of front sight... I'd take a file to it, if it bothered me, and touch up with cold blue and model paint.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is offline  
Old February 12, 2011, 10:23 PM   #3
PitBull
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 124
Thanks for the reply.
If it used half the elevation to get to 50 yds I wouldnt mind but it's using nearly twice that to get half the distance.
At this point if I were to go with front sight filing I'd be down to a nub by the time I got it down enough.
PitBull is offline  
Old February 13, 2011, 01:48 PM   #4
zippy13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
>I have rifles with aperture sights so I know what the sight picture is supposed to be.
Perhaps you and Mossberg differ in this. I was taught to use a six-o'clock (punkin on a fence post) sight picture with aperture sights and bullseye-type targets. Other's advocate a centered sight picture. Obviously, mixing methods can result in vertical differences equal to the radius of the black. Frequently we see similar questions on sight alignment, and many opinions are offered without questioning the OP's sight picture. The Mossberg owner's manual addresses adjusting the ghost ring sight; but, makes no mention of the "proper" sight picture nor what slug weight/velocity is recommended.
zippy13 is offline  
Old February 13, 2011, 05:09 PM   #5
PitBull
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 124

A 6 oclock hold would put my POI even lower.
PitBull is offline  
Old February 15, 2011, 04:46 PM   #6
Icopy1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 415
Call Mossberg and ask them. There could be a problem with your weapon. Or it could be designed to use a particular load.
Icopy1 is offline  
Old February 15, 2011, 04:59 PM   #7
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
Maybe a different cheek weld position?

Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old February 15, 2011, 08:43 PM   #8
PitBull
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 124
I beleive i will call them. I just wanted to see if this is a common issue with this model first.
PitBull is offline  
Old March 3, 2011, 09:28 PM   #9
PitBull
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 124
Mossberg said to send it back to them and that it's still under warranty so I did. It arrived there today. When I comes back (no telling how long) I'll shoot it and come back here with the results.
PitBull is offline  
Old March 4, 2011, 06:16 PM   #10
Hoosier_Daddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2011
Location: Lower Michigan
Posts: 163
Bummer that you received a defective one. Hopefully they will turn it around quickly and make sure you are satisfied.
Hoosier_Daddy is offline  
Old March 4, 2011, 09:25 PM   #11
Delaware_Dan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2008
Posts: 1,304
Mossbergs front sights are not the most QCed on the market. The 930 SPX had a run of shotguns with a canted (to the left if I remember) front sight. Since I read this online I went to Dicks and my LGS, and yup, canted to the left buy quite a bit. I hope Mossberg makes this right.
__________________
To hell with circumstances. I create opportunities.

-Bruce Lee
Delaware_Dan is offline  
Old March 13, 2011, 03:19 PM   #12
Malpaso
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2000
Location: MA
Posts: 177
I walked into a 3 gun shoot today without zeroing mine and was off about 6" to the left at 50 yards. I can't seem to find the "adjustment per click" information anywhere. I'd like to get a general idea of windage adjustment before sighting it in. Anyone have that information?
Malpaso is offline  
Old March 13, 2011, 06:41 PM   #13
zippy13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
I can't seem to find the "adjustment per click" information anywhere. I'd like to get a general idea of windage adjustment before sighting it in. Anyone have that information?
Perhaps there's a Mossberg ghost-ring owner out there with a laser bore sight. It could be used to estimate the sight's clicks-per-inch at a given distance.
zippy13 is offline  
Old April 22, 2011, 09:39 PM   #14
PitBull
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 124
Got it back today!

After a 1 1/2 months it finally came back. I don't know what they did to it but they sent a copy of a bullseye target marked "50 yards" with a 3 shot slug group in the 10 ring that measures about 2 inches center to center.
If it really does that well for me I'll be ecstatic!
I won't have time to go shooting this weekend but I will in the next few weeks. There was nothing stating what had been done to correct the issue. The only thing changed visibly is that there was a small scratch on the barrel that's no longer there. That means they either touched up the scratch just because or it was a bad barrel and they replaced it with a new one.
They also sent an owners manual and a cable lock for it.
I'll come back with a range report when I shoot it.
PitBull is offline  
Old April 22, 2011, 10:28 PM   #15
p99guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 2004
Location: Haslet,Texas(DFW area)
Posts: 1,506
Sarge, you no doubt purchased six Models 500's 20 years ago...but you certainly didnt purchase Model 590A1's- they arent THAT old.
__________________
Lighten up Francis!.....;Actor Warren Oats, in the movie "Stripes"
p99guy is offline  
Old April 22, 2011, 11:22 PM   #16
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
Quote:
p99guy Sarge, you no doubt purchased six Models 500's 20 years ago...but you certainly didnt purchase Model 590A1's- they arent THAT old.
They were 590-A1's for certain- long mag tube, heavy barrel, ghost-ring sights and metal triggerguard and safety button. We got them from a LE supplier and I specifically recall ordering 590s. I know what they were because I zeroed every one of them. I may be off by a year but this would have been no later than late 1992. The office-holder who approved them was gone that November.

Don't know where you are getting your info but by googling around a little, I can find references to the 590-A1 from late 80's, purportedly after the Navy requested heavier barrels because standard barrels were getting dented on-ship.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is offline  
Old April 23, 2011, 04:32 AM   #17
Ryder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 222
Get the one with the bead sight like I did and your slugs will be hitting 2 feet high at 30 yards
Ryder is offline  
Old April 23, 2011, 06:48 AM   #18
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
I must have gotten real lucky with the Maverick 88 I just slapped together, then.

A slug at 25 yards, load of 00 buck at 25, and a second slug (red highlight) at 50 yards-



(Plus some birdshot thrown in, just because
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is offline  
Old April 23, 2011, 08:11 AM   #19
PitBull
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 124
I have a Maverick 88, too. I've had it for quite a while and I've only tried slugs in it once and they were high and to the right at 40 yds.
It does a decent enough job with 00 buck.
PitBull is offline  
Old April 23, 2011, 12:19 PM   #20
colostomyclown
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2009
Posts: 613
Quote:
Sarge, you no doubt purchased six Models 500's 20 years ago...but you certainly didnt purchase Model 590A1's- they arent THAT old.

yes, they actually are. the civilian 590a1 models aren't but the gun has been produced on contract mil/le runs since the mid or late 80's, phasing out the 500mils and 500atp
colostomyclown is offline  
Old April 23, 2011, 02:58 PM   #21
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
Ryder, This may sting a little But according to the law of physics and the encyclopedia of planes, angles and screw threads I have before me... A bead sight equipped gun can not make you shoot high/low/left/right or anything.

The reasons a blade sight can "make" you shoot inaccurately with any gun are simply lacking with either a single bead or mid barrel second bead.

The blade and ghost ring sights require the alignment of a plane between to items on the gun. Both of these items have too many variable measurements to assume you won't be shooting 2 feet high.

The bead is a "point of reference" sort of like a hood ornament on the car.

All you need to realize is the way the gun shoots at a given distance considering a consistent grip, cheek weld and shoulder placement. For instance, I can hit a pie plate 60-65 yards with my 18 inch barreled mossberg 500 cyl. choke with slugs. The plate will be exactly touching the top of the barrel and the bead will show inside the edge. For 50 yards, the plate is on top of the bead.

For thirty yards, there will be around 3/4 inch of daylight between the plate and barrel. You make the adjustments. And remember the gun has to accommodate so many loads and distances. A slug is lethal out to a hundred yards and they kill a bunch of deer every year but the same gun is just as accurate at 10 yards when you compensate as you must. You just have to know your gun these varying distances.

Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old April 23, 2011, 03:47 PM   #22
jackblack73
Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2011
Posts: 68
Quote:
Get the one with the bead sight like I did and your slugs will be hitting 2 feet high at 30 yards
I'm new to shotguns, so when I first shot my 18.5" 590A1 I was shooting extremely high too. I found it was uncomfortable to get a low enough cheek weld and sight picture with the bead. I finally decided to install a set of ghost ring sights, not just because of the more precise sighting system, but because the ghost ring is slightly raised off the receiver and more comfortable and natural to use.
jackblack73 is offline  
Old April 23, 2011, 04:21 PM   #23
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
Quote:
Ryder, This may sting a little But according to the law of physics and the encyclopedia of planes, angles and screw threads I have before me... A bead sight equipped gun can not make you shoot high/low/left/right or anything.
Oh, but they can and do affect the elevation of your POI with slugs, particularly between 25 and 75 yards. That is precisely the reason you will see some bead-sighted riot guns with a platform or ramp under the bead. I've had issued scatterguns--always w/o that ramp--that shot a foot and a half high at 50 yards.

I suspect this relates to the amount of taper in the barrel, but cannot state that as undisputed fact. I also suspect most manufacturers eventually figured this out and have adjusted accordingly.

The bead on the aforementioned Maverick is fairly tall by shotgun standards, stepped, and it has a very small bead on top. The above target was shot using only that tiny bead showing above the center of the sighting plane on the receiver. Had I just thrown the gun up and held the whole bead up, my 50 yard shot would have been high, maybe over the shoulders.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is offline  
Old April 26, 2011, 03:31 AM   #24
Ryder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 222
There's a big step down from the receiver to the barrel. I center the bead on the receiver using it as a rear sight. Haven't measured it yet but that step down is likely close to a quarter inch. Would be less of a factor on a long barrel, mine's only 18".

The gun hits dead on if I shoot instinctive so it's not a pressing issue but I'll probably raise that bead eventually.
Ryder is offline  
Old April 26, 2011, 02:42 PM   #25
Dave McC
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 13, 1999
Location: Columbia, Md, USA
Posts: 8,811
Sarge has it right. Beads mounted directly to the barrel oft cause slugs to shoot way high from POA. A base under the bead is a quick fix. Or, use Kentucky elevation.
Dave McC is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07171 seconds with 8 queries