December 16, 2009, 07:42 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 23, 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 151
|
Loaded for bear
With the blackpowder season in full swing I was sitting around shooting the bull with the guys today as I am now tagged out. One of the oldtimers mentioned that the phrase loaded for bear refered to loading two patched round balls and some extra powder into a rifle. This sounds very dangerous to me and does not make sense in a rifle. If it were a smoothbore maybe but the presure would still increase and could cause a problem. Has anyone else heard of this.
|
December 16, 2009, 08:03 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,824
|
No, but I'd go with a minie rifle that was loaded with a 500 plus grain 58 caliber minie ball that was propelled by 65 grains FF. Better yet, a Kodiak double barrel .58 cal rifle. Two shots are better than one.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
December 16, 2009, 08:52 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2008
Posts: 891
|
I have heard that the double charge means "loaded for bear."
I have "proof tested" three muzzleloaders with a double load of powder and two balls. In the case of my Tennessee Mountain Rifle, that meant 160 grains of ffg black powder, and two patched balls. It did not harm the barrel! With a 42 inch barrel, I bet that most of that powder got burned. For God's sake that had to be some serious foot-pounds of energy. If I were bear hunting, I think I would go with the increased powder, and only one ball, I would want the penetration. |
December 16, 2009, 10:30 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,772
|
Single load of powder beneath two prb's is not a problem as long as the first ball is firmly seated on the powder and the second ball is firmly seated on the first ball.
Double load of powder beneath two prb's MAY not be a problem depending on what maximum load the barrel is designed to withstand. As above, the first ball must be firmly seated on the powder and the second ball must be firmly seated on the first ball. Single load of powder beneath one prb with another load of powder and ball on top of it is big time trouble. |
December 17, 2009, 11:26 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
I have heard the phrase "loaded for bear" for ever it seems like. I have read about and even shoot two ball loads. I have not heard about a double powder charger with the two ball load. It does make sense though.
I have always assumed that the phrase meant a very heavy charge and bullet. Never considered applying it to a front stuffer. Quote:
|
|
December 17, 2009, 05:03 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2008
Posts: 891
|
After I proofed my Tennessee Mountain Rifle, and it didn't blow up, I decided to try the two-ball load for accuracy. For the proofing, I had the thing fixed in a tire, with a 50 foot string, I was afraid it would blow.
I dropped the powder charge back to 80 grains and fired at a target at 50 yards. The elevation was dead on, the balls hit side-by-side, 1 1/2 inches apart. I was surprised the balls were so close together. I knew that would be a devastating shot on a deer. But, on the other hand, a single ball was a devastating shot on a deer, I well knew that from hunting with my Hawken. Also, I figured the 2 ball load might get inaccurate at 100 yards, although, I never tried anything past 50 yards. I never went hunting with the 2-ball load. |
December 17, 2009, 05:48 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2009
Posts: 643
|
"Buck and ball" used to refer to a common load of a single patched ball under some buckshot. Ready for anything.
|
December 17, 2009, 11:41 PM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 10, 2009
Posts: 974
|
the multi ball loads were not used for big animal defense. When the british army or navy would load a musket up with 2 or 3 balls on a charge of powder, they did so that when the gun was fired at that unruly mob of colonials/boarders, each shot would have the ability to hit more then one person.
|
December 18, 2009, 11:02 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
Quote:
|
|
December 18, 2009, 11:13 PM | #10 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 10, 2009
Posts: 974
|
all the world loved multiple round balls on a charge of powder for crowd control. theres a shipwreck in the saintlawrence from the french and indian wars, they recovered dozens of muskets that had 3 balls on top of the powder.
not exactly conducive to accuracy for firendly recoil. thats why colonial 'rangers" like rogers rangers kinda liked the round ball with 3 pellets of buck on top. |
December 24, 2009, 02:29 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: May 19, 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 75
|
Enough
Now I always thought it meant you were carrying/packed for any circumstances ...enough powder/ammo for any length of fire fight or animal
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|