The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 12, 2020, 11:06 PM   #1
GJeffB
Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2009
Location: Southern Colorado
Posts: 68
LR Primer v Standard

OK, you all know I cross post. Just for a variety of opinions ...

I try to pride myself on research. We've all discussed substituting components, and i received great help with substituting Large Pistol Magnum primers for Large Pistol standard. Thanks. Now, to continue hammering the horse ...

LRifle primers are really hard to find locally. My question does not deal with expensive hazmat fees.

Thanks to the community my .45-70 Cimarron Sharps 1874 is on the way and I can gather everything except LR primers.
I emailed Winchester, CCI, and Federal asking if I could substitute LR Magnums in a pinch, with appropriate reductions. All responses were the lawyer safe "no, you must not deviate." OK, fine. But I searched the interweb pretty thoroughly. The vast majority of various forum answers to the question was to the effect "back down 10%, no problem, work up from there, I/we do it regularly ..."

I'm not looking to sue anybody. I'm looking for actual experiences, please. Then there's the "in cold weather best to substitute magnum primers."

Background: loading handgun calibers since 1960's. Some bottlenecks 10+ years ago. Back into .45 colt, .45 acp, .38/.357. Straight walls. I realize .45-70 is tapered, lubed, etc. Got it. Bottom line: safe loading practices. Light/staring loads in .45-70 falling block, H4198 or AA5744. LR primers unavailable, is substituting LR Magnum acceptable on an ad hoc basis?

Thanks as always. You may find same/similar post elsewhere

-jb
__________________
Spyros: People who talk little listen a lot. Which is why they're wise; it's harder to learn while talking
GJeffB is offline  
Old November 12, 2020, 11:34 PM   #2
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
Big ol' .45-70? Of course you can use LR magnum primers. You probably won't even have to reduce anything, but back off 5% anyway from your tested loads (you probably dont have tested loads) and work back up just to be safe.

With a different primer it's a different load, but not all that much different.

Don't be tempted to use large pistol primers. They should be strong enough, and they are the right diameter, but they aren't tall enough so you won't seat them properly. Or if you do, your firing pin might not have a long enough reach.

Are you using black powder? (if so, don't reduce anything just go for it) Or Reloder 7? Or what?
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old November 12, 2020, 11:40 PM   #3
totaldla
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2009
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,295
Yes you can use mag primers. I've chrono'd that in my 45-70 loads and with a fast powder like H4198 it doesn't make a difference.
totaldla is offline  
Old November 13, 2020, 11:49 AM   #4
Sharkbite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 2013
Location: Western slope of Colorado
Posts: 3,679
I dont have any experience loading 45-70, but...

I do substitute mag primers in one of my 300blk loads. The load uses H110 and calls for standard small rifle primers.

I live in the mountains of western Colorado and it gets COLD here. Minus zero for parts of the winter (burrrrr). Years ago, when working up this load, i was getting SD’s all over the place. I think temps were in the teens at the time. I backed down the load, used some mag primers and the load settled down and gave me good results.

So, now i use the mag primers for that load (110 & 125 gn bullets and H110).
Sharkbite is offline  
Old November 13, 2020, 04:58 PM   #5
GJeffB
Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2009
Location: Southern Colorado
Posts: 68
Pretty much as expected.
zxcvbob: no, not black powder. "Light/staring loads in .45-70 falling block, H4198 or AA5744"

Thanks for the confirmation again. Guess I can't blame the manufacturers for sticking with the standard "do not change the components" reply. They have to CYA like most.

-jb
__________________
Spyros: People who talk little listen a lot. Which is why they're wise; it's harder to learn while talking
GJeffB is offline  
Old November 13, 2020, 05:34 PM   #6
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by GJeffB View Post
Pretty much as expected.
zxcvbob: no, not black powder. "Light/staring loads in .45-70 falling block, H4198 or AA5744"

Thanks for the confirmation again. Guess I can't blame the manufacturers for sticking with the standard "do not change the components" reply. They have to CYA like most.
You did say that and I missed it. "No not change anything" is for shotgun reloading. "This is what we tested" is for pistol and rifle data; be careful what you change.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05329 seconds with 8 queries