The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 21, 2012, 12:16 PM   #26
wogpotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
What? Speak up, I can't hear you!
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”?

Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.”
wogpotter is offline  
Old December 21, 2012, 03:02 PM   #27
vba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 26, 2008
Posts: 357
Just shoot a .308 or .30-06 without hearing protection and it will be the same result. Did it once by accident, never again!
vba is offline  
Old December 21, 2012, 03:54 PM   #28
Erno86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2012
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 1,739
With or without muzzle brakes...the shorter the barrel, the louder the blast. The M44 Mosin Carbine...is a loud mouth fire breathing dragon. Stick with ear protection, or you'll possibly wind-up suffering tinnitus for decades; like I've had.

Ear plugs, by themselves, are not that effective --- because their is a cartilage bone in your ear flap's --- that transmits noise vibration to your eardrum; which if loud enough...can cause hearing damage. At our range...even totally deaf people wear hearing protection; cuz they still can rupture there eardrums --- just like you and me.

Headphones along with earplugs...are needed for such cartridges such as the 300 RUM with muzzle brake, {which that the --- muzzle brake ---- amplifies the sound, and is banned on certain guided professional hunts in Africa} on up past the 50 BMG.

Last edited by Erno86; December 21, 2012 at 04:27 PM.
Erno86 is offline  
Old December 21, 2012, 04:58 PM   #29
Onward Allusion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: Back in a Non-Free State
Posts: 3,133
Quote:
tahunua001
if you can afford electronic earplugs then by all means buy them for hunting however for the 90% of us that can't afford them we hunt without ear plugs despite the danger that it poses to our hearing. the report from a 91/30 is no greater than a 30-06 or 223.
$2 for earplugs. $30 bucks for electronic earmuffs. About $80 for an inexpensive pair of electronic earplugs. Good hearing - priceless.

Hearing damage is cumulative. One additional shot can put one over the edge and have them suffering from tinnitus. I know, 'cause it happen to me. I inadvertently shot a 22LR round from a rifle one day at the club and heard ringing immediately. The ringing faded but never completely went away from that point forward. I now double up with earplugs and earmuffs to prevent any additional damage.
__________________
Simple as ABC . . . Always Be Carrying
Onward Allusion is offline  
Old December 22, 2012, 11:00 AM   #30
jjyergler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 31, 2008
Posts: 295
I'm no expert,

I bet its just as loud as without hearing protection.
__________________
Remington Nylon 66 .22LR - Squirrels Beware
Browning BAR Safari II .270 Win - Whitetails Beware
Sig Sauer P229 .40 S+W - Burglars Beware
Hi Standard Supermatic Citation .22LR - Tincans Beware
jjyergler is offline  
Old December 24, 2012, 12:49 PM   #31
ndking1126
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 1,932
Quote:
I bet its just as loud as without hearing protection.
Haha, that's what I'm talking about. Good one.

I agree, there's no reason to shoot without hearing protection, even when hunting. If its a once in a lifetime chance that requires an immediate shot, I10 guess its your hearing.. but rarely do you not have an extra 10-15 seconds to get hearing protection on before taking the shot.
ndking1126 is offline  
Old December 24, 2012, 03:10 PM   #32
shredder4286
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 13, 2010
Location: NE Washington
Posts: 361
I got a $5 pair of the wrap-around kind of ear plugs that you can pop in your ears quickly if you've spotted and animal and are preparing to shoot. You just reach down with one hand and pop them in each ear- only takes about 3 seconds.
shredder4286 is offline  
Old December 24, 2012, 04:06 PM   #33
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
Quote:
$2 for earplugs. $30 bucks for electronic earmuffs. About $80 for an inexpensive pair of electronic earplugs. Good hearing - priceless.
I want to know who here is capable of hearing a deer sneak through the woods with earplugs in? really? I must just be a hillbilly and live in a backwater area because nobody I know that has ever been hunting has used earplugs while hunting and if I ever saw someone wearing them I would probably laugh so loud that I'd scare off all the game anyway.

now I have heard of electronic earplugs that allow you to hear normally but filters out gunshots but last I knew they were several hundred dollars a pair.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
tahunua001 is offline  
Old December 24, 2012, 05:44 PM   #34
wogpotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
Depending on how you adjust them they can hear better than "reg'lar hearin' & they're nowhere near hunnrets of dollahs.

You have been able to to get mechanical plugs with normal audio till there is a sound over 85dB for under 25 bucks too & they dont even need batteries.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”?

Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.”
wogpotter is offline  
Old December 24, 2012, 10:30 PM   #35
BerdanSS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Location: to close to other houses
Posts: 1,176
Too loud, BELIVE ME. Not as loud as my 98 K but.......
BerdanSS is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 12:26 PM   #36
DFrame
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 7, 2008
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 451
Very loud. For some reason the russian ammo seems to have little or no flame supressant in it. Most blast a huge fireball in front of the gun.
__________________
Mark Lane to William Buckley: "Have you ever referred to Jessee Jackson as an ignoramus?"
Buckley: "If I didn't, I should have"
DFrame is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 12:46 PM   #37
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
"I dunno how loud. Never shot one without protection "
I've never shot a MN POS but I've shot a lot of 30/06 w/o ear protection. Good Lord, people back in the beginning of time(before ear plugs) everyone shot everything w/o ear protection. I'm not saying it was right or good, but we didn't know any better.
There seems to be a whole generation of shooters who have never fired a gun outside of a range or controlled environment.
Mobuck is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 01:03 PM   #38
Mrgunsngear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 13, 2011
Location: Carolina
Posts: 3,415
Quote:
With or without muzzle brakes...the shorter the barrel, the louder the blast. The M44 Mosin Carbine...is a loud mouth fire breathing dragon. Stick with ear protection, or you'll possibly wind-up suffering tinnitus for decades; like I've had.


Agreed. The M44 will chatter your teeth if they're clenched when you fire it. It's awesome
__________________
Mrgunsngear Youtube Channel
Mrgunsngear is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 01:05 PM   #39
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by tahunua001 View Post
I want to know who here is capable of hearing a deer sneak through the woods with earplugs in? really? I must just be a hillbilly and live in a backwater area because nobody I know that has ever been hunting has used earplugs while hunting and if I ever saw someone wearing them I would probably laugh so loud that I'd scare off all the game anyway.

now I have heard of electronic earplugs that allow you to hear normally but filters out gunshots but last I knew they were several hundred dollars a pair.
Last you heard must have been a LONG, LONG time ago.

I have a pair of Radians that I bought at least 7 or 8 years ago. They cost around $125 and they weren't the cheapest available.

Now days, virtually any outdoor store has models starting around $30 or less. I bought a set from Dicks, about 2 years ago, that cost about $25. They work very well.

Hunting without hearing protection isn't even an option for me. I forgot my electronic muffs once last year and just took a nap at camp. No way am I doing more damage than has already been done.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 01:11 PM   #40
TheGoldenState
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 8, 2010
Posts: 1,191
it'll cause ringing-which is the damage.

Search the forum, there are accounts of ONE or two times causing tinnitus.


$0.99 will get you push in ear plugs.
__________________
The Day You Get Comfortable Is The Day You Get Careless...
TheGoldenState is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 01:17 PM   #41
Toney
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Stillwater Oklahoma
Posts: 790
What? Speak up can't here ya
Toney is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 01:48 PM   #42
jmfc606
Member
 
Join Date: December 27, 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 99
Don't shoot ANYTHING without hearing protection. You'll pay for it later gaurenteed!
__________________
Joe C
NRA Benefactor Member
jmfc606 is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 02:28 PM   #43
jimherb
Junior Member
 
Join Date: December 22, 2012
Posts: 6
If you shoot it enough, you won't need hearing protection.
jimherb is offline  
Old December 26, 2012, 12:15 AM   #44
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
There is really only one way to answer this question.

Some things aren't worth the chase.

The incredible thing is military in the US and other countries never care about hearing protection. I have a buddy who as an officer did live fire excercises in a concrete block basement with no hearing protection circa 2008. He would always have ringing afterwards and didn't worry about it. Of course they also never used their hip belts.

I don't think hearing protection was issued in WWII.
Unless electronic I don't want to wear it anywhere but the range. I try to keep a foam plug in my right ear though.
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old December 26, 2012, 12:49 AM   #45
paknheat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2006
Location: East Texas
Posts: 334
It's pretty friggin loud, but then again so is an '06 or a 7 mag.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
paknheat is offline  
Old December 26, 2012, 02:05 AM   #46
Aaron1100us
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2011
Posts: 235
My Tiger shoots the 7.62x54R and its loud even with ear protection. The only thing I shoot without ear protection is a .22 rifle. My Wife's Walther P22 with CCI Stingers is even too loud to not have hearing protection.

Sent from my PB99400 using Tapatalk 2
Aaron1100us is offline  
Old December 26, 2012, 02:17 PM   #47
Erno86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2012
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 1,739
Shoot the Mosin without hearing protection?...And you'll likely wind-up in the same condition as our range alley cat, named Homer --- DEAF.
Erno86 is offline  
Old December 28, 2012, 12:03 AM   #48
Tom68
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 20, 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 349
Johnwilliamson, sorry but I've just got to reply to your comment that the US Military doesn't care about hearing protection. While I cannot relate to your buddy's experience, I attended Basic/AIT in 1990 and have been an Army Officer since 1992... and hearing protection has ALWAYS been stressed any time live fire was conducted. So much, that at times I felt that the establishment was getting a little carried away... I mean, ear plugs in a case was a required part of my uniform back when we still wore BDUs. Today, I rarely see anyone with an earplug case hung from ACU, but then again, I haven't been to a range in 15 years that the organization running it did not have a large box full of foam earplugs and a Safety NCO badgering everyone to use them.

One experience, though, that while it was a lesson in hearing protection... it probably did not have the blessing of the Infantry School: During a class during my Infantry Officer Basic Course we were being taught call for fire procedures. When my platoon arrived, we were told to get into the bleachers and then the instructor began his presentation. We all noticed the M109 155mm howitzer parked 50 yard in front of us.... and I guess we all thought it was a prop for the class. When the instructor noted that this particular howitzer is in a posture which you do NOT want, that being the barrel depressed to zero mils elevation in preparation for firing canister at oncoming enemy infantry.... his presentation was rudely interrupted by the loudest boom we had ever heard: his next remark was, "oh yeah, I was just about to tell you.... hearing protection is required on this range". Great lesson... but still, thanks a lot!

back on topic though, my hearing is tested every couple of years, and I am showing some signs of hearing loss. While I am certain that my government has my best interests at heart, I am equally sure that they want to limit future VA claims as best as possible.
Tom68 is offline  
Old December 28, 2012, 12:22 AM   #49
Deja vu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
Where I hunt frequently you only get about 1 second to make the shot (short range in heavy brush) in such a hunt quickly slipping on hearing protection is not an option.

Ideally I think a silencer would be about perfect... that said I think the next best option is wearing electronic hearing protection.
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull.

all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well...
Deja vu is offline  
Old December 29, 2012, 10:31 PM   #50
barnbwt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
I don't think hearing protection was issued in WWII.
Ya'know, they did a lot of stupid stuff back in WWII, that doesn't mean we should continue it

I recall reading an article fairly recently about hearing loss being the number one (or thereabouts) factor in medical/disability claims for former servicemen. The military (or at least their beancounters) certainly do care they're on the hook for expensive prosthetics for the rest of those guys' lives.

Quote:
Where I hunt frequently you only get about 1 second to make the shot (short range in heavy brush) in such a hunt quickly slipping on hearing protection is not an option.
Just be aware of the deer/hearing transaction that has just taken place in such a scenario, and make sure it is truly worth it for you. That's all us hearing-protection advocates have a right to demand. I personally would only risk my ears to save my life (my analogy is it is like shooting through your hand when you don't wear protection).

TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things."
-- Alex Rosewater
barnbwt is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10296 seconds with 8 queries