The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 6, 2012, 12:56 PM   #1
Kimio
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,171
Please help me understand bullet "Weight"

Forgive my ignorance, but when ya'll discuss bullet "weight" are you actually talking about the literal weight of the bullet itself or the powder behind the round?

Reason I'm asking is that I'm considering some time down the line of switching my 1:9 twist barrel of my AR15 to that of maybe a 1:7 twist to fire the "heavier" loads. As I understand it, "Heavier" rounds need a faster twist rate in order to stabilize them, "heavier" loads as I understand it are apparently more accurate as well when compared to the lighter bullets.

Some clarification would be appreciated.
Kimio is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 12:58 PM   #2
hodaka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2006
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,010
It is the weight of the bullet itself, typically measured in units of grains (like a pharmacy), not grams.
hodaka is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 01:01 PM   #3
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
Weight could be the bullet or the charge but if they say "bullet weight" or "heavier bullet" for example, it's the bullet, not the powder charge.

Both the charge and the bullet are measured in the same unit though, grains.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives...
...they just don't plan not to.
-Andy Stanley
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 01:23 PM   #4
Marco Califo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,598
1:9 twist is very good and very versatile

1:9 twist is very a good and very versatile, all around performer. In contrast, the typical bolt action Varmint rifles were usually 1:12 or 1:14. Today, if you want that slow of a twist from Savage, they have it in 22-250, but not 223, which are all 1:9 (or the single 1:7 linked below).

I shoot 223 75 gr Hornady HPBT with excellent long range accuracy, in a 1:9 Savage bolt rifle, while also doing fine down to 40 grn bullets.
Conversely, 1:7 twist may limit you to only shooting heavier bullets.

You will find a very good discussion of the twist rates here:
"only select a 1:7″ or faster twist barrel if we had a need to shoot the 90gr VLDs." http://www.accurateshooter.com/cartridge-guides/223rem/
You can also download both the Sierra bullets 223 guides (bolt and AR) there.

If I do buy a 1:7 223, it will be this one:
http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/p...ducts_id/60970
One reason is the 30" barrel length. Conversly, if you are shooting an AR you are only going to have 16-20" inches of barrel, and that will limit your powder choices, and velocity. Although you can get 24" heavy AR barrels, Bushmaster makes one (whole gun)..
__________________
............

Last edited by Marco Califo; November 6, 2012 at 01:38 PM.
Marco Califo is online now  
Old November 6, 2012, 02:26 PM   #5
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
Kimio, let me see if I can make things a little clearer.

In any given caliber, the diameter of the bullet is fixed - carved in stone so to speak. So, to make one bullet that is heavier than another bullet there are only two ways to do it. First is to use a denser material (think using heavy gold in one bullet and light copper in another). Since actual bullets are generally made out of copper coated lead this option really isn't practical. The second option is to make one bullet longer than the other. This is the option that is actually used. With a caliber like .223, there is a HUGE range of available bullet weights. They are all .223 in diameter so the only way to make the range of weights is to make them shorter or longer.

If you have ever thrown a football, you'll know that you have to impart a spin to the ball in order to get any distance or accuracy. Bullets are just the same. A bullet that doesn't spin won't fly for crap. The amount of spin needed to make it fly "optimally" depends on the length of the bullet in relation to the diameter of the bullet. The longer a bullet is for a fixed diameter, the faster it needs to spin to make it fly right.

Continuing with our .223 example, spinning one revolution every 12 inches may be just fine for a short 40grn bullet. However, if you used that same rate of twist with a heavy 70 grn bullet it would be severely underspun and accuracy would be horrible. .223 rifle manufacturers will offer a fairly wide range of twist rates so that the user will be able to match the barrel up with the weight of bullet he intends to shoot. Conversely, knowing the twist rate of the barrel you already have helps you determine which bullet should shoot best out of it.
Doyle is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 02:37 PM   #6
Woody55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: East Texas
Posts: 407
In the context of your initial question, you are talking about the weight of the bullet (the projectile) itself.

In the beginning, the M16A1 fired a 55 grain bullet. If memory serves, the rifle had a 1:12 twist.

The A2 version fires a 62 grain bullet. To stableize the heavier bullet, the twist was tightened to !:7.

I have an AR 15 with a 1:9 twist. It does just fine with both 55 grain and 62 grain bullets. I've never shot a heavier bullet.

If you care, 1 pound = 7,000 grains. The only thing I use this for is powder for reloading. Like I put (slightly less than) 5 grains of powder in a .40 S&W cartridge case. That means the one pound container of powder I buy is good for 1,400 rounds.
Woody55 is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 03:25 PM   #7
Sevens
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
Great explanation! I just want to highlight this part for the OP:
Quote:
The amount of spin needed to make it fly "optimally" depends on the length of the bullet in relation to the diameter of the bullet. The longer a bullet is for a fixed diameter, the faster it needs to spin to make it fly right.
So yes, we are talking about bullet weight and folks that pick different rifle barrel twists often believe they are picking their twist because of a bullet weight, but the truth is -- it's about the bullet length, not the weight. It just also happens that...the longer bullets weigh more.

Also, from the OP's initial question:
Quote:
Forgive my ignorance, but when ya'll discuss bullet "weight" are you actually talking about the literal weight of the bullet itself or the powder behind the round?
When the average guy goes to the store to look at factory ammo, the only weight listed on the package is going to be the bullet weight in grains. As Woody55 nicely explained, "grains" is a unit of measure and does not mean "individual granules." It references a grain of wheat.

When you look at a box of factory ammo, the weight listed is that of the bullet, in grains. But when we look at handload data, either from ammo that we produced or from published data in a book, they list a bullet weight (in your AR, the weight being between 40 grains and 70 or so) and we also denote a powder charge weight -- which is also expressed in the grain unit of measure.

I tend to use around 19.6 grains of powder (H4198) under a 55 grain SP bullet in a .223 load that I like.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss.
Sevens is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 03:41 PM   #8
brokenanew
Member
 
Join Date: September 14, 2012
Posts: 83
The 1:7 twist does not always mean it will shot those heavier bullets in an AR. especially VLD type of bullets or the AMAX. A lot plays into how well it will shot a heavier bullet including barrel length and whether its Heavy barrel or not.

Mine personally with a 1:7 twist wont shoot anything between 60 -77 worth a darn. But it will shoot half inch groups with the 77gr SMK and 3/4" groups with the 60 vmax all day long.

That aside, yes twist rate does have the most effect on whether you can stabilize a heavier bullet
1:9 should work well for anything 69 gr and down. Some people can get away with shooting the 75 gr well with a 1:9 but not likely with a shorter barrel like a mid-length (16") or under.

1:7 should theoretically shoot anything 69 gr or heavier well. Again there are more factors to consider. Some one made a good point its not so much the weight has it is the length with the exception of bullets with a good a non-sensative O-give like the SMK as opposed to ones that are O-give sensitive like the A-max (those are really long and wont stabilize well in my 16" 1:7). But its also the length that gives you the real distance. You have to sacrifice one or the other.

Look if its an AR the heaviest your going to be able to get WITHOUT doing single loading is the 77gr SMK. Even then it may not shoot worth a darn even when u play with the seating depth.

BEST thing to do is just try them and see. Good luck, sorry so long.
brokenanew is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 04:29 PM   #9
UtopiaTexasG19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Location: S.E. Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 743
"In any given caliber, the diameter of the bullet is fixed - carved in stone so to speak."

Well, Except in the lead cast bullet world. I hang out with a group of Winchester 30-30 fanatics that cast and reload their own bullets. In the group of 12 members we shoot .308,.309,.310,.311 and .312 diameter bullets depending on the weight and what is the most accurate in any particular rifle.
UtopiaTexasG19 is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 04:36 PM   #10
TheDutchman19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 117
I have never quite understood barrel twist myself. Can some please clarify this for me?

1:7 = one rotation for every 7" of barrel?
TheDutchman19 is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 04:37 PM   #11
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
Quote:
Well, Except in the lead cast bullet world. I hang out with a group of Winchester 30-30 fanatics that cast and reload their own bullets. In the group of 12 members we shoot .308,.309,.310,.311 and .312 diameter bullets depending on the weight and what is the most accurate in any particular rifle.
Yea, there are oddballs in every crowd.
Doyle is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 04:59 PM   #12
FlyFish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Overlooking the Baker River Valley
Posts: 1,723
Quote:
I have never quite understood barrel twist myself. Can some please clarify this for me?

1:7 = one rotation for every 7" of barrel?
Yes, exactly. The smaller the second number, the more (faster) spin is imparted to the bullet (assuming a constant muzzle velocity), and faster spin will be better for stabilizing a heavier (really longer, as an earlier poster pointed out) bullet.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Life Member
NRA Certified Instructor: Rifle, Pistol, Shotgun, PPIH, Metallic & Shotgun Shell Reloading; RSO
Pemigewasset Valley Fish & Game Club
FlyFish is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 07:47 PM   #13
Sport45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 25, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,196
Quote:
Well, Except in the lead cast bullet world. I hang out with a group of Winchester 30-30 fanatics that cast and reload their own bullets. In the group of 12 members we shoot .308,.309,.310,.311 and .312 diameter bullets depending on the weight and what is the most accurate in any particular rifle.
Okay, for every firearm the diameter of the barrel is fixed. You can poke bigger bullets in it, but they won't come out any bigger than the bore diameter.

Quote:
The A2 version fires a 62 grain bullet. To stableize the heavier bullet, the twist was tightened to !:7.
I don't think the 62 grain bullet by itself was long enough to merit the faster twist rate. Wasn't it the tracer that was too long for the 1:12? Tracer compound is quite light compared to lead.
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter.
Sport45 is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 07:48 PM   #14
CrustyFN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,258
Quote:
Reason I'm asking is that I'm considering some time down the line of switching my 1:9 twist barrel of my AR15 to that of maybe a 1:7 twist to fire the "heavier" loads. As I understand it, "Heavier" rounds need a faster twist rate in order to stabilize them, "heavier" loads as I understand it are apparently more accurate as well when compared to the lighter bullets.
Looks like you got a lot of great answers already so I would just like to add to be carefull with the heavier bullets. As someone posted already the heavier bullet has to be longer. When the longer bullets are loaded to the correct OAL then you are going to start out growing the magazine and you will have to load them one at a time. For me that wouldn't be much fun wuth an AR.
__________________
I don't ever remember being absent minded.
CrustyFN is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 08:18 PM   #15
UtopiaTexasG19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Location: S.E. Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 743
"Okay, for every firearm the diameter of the barrel is fixed. You can poke bigger bullets in it, but they won't come out any bigger than the bore diameter. "

Well, not really. The reason a barrel is "slugged" is to find out the diameter of that particular barrel. One would think that a 1,000 barrels comming off the same assembly line would have the same exact diameter but it just isn't so. Also due to wear and tear, age and use, the diameters can range quite a bit.
UtopiaTexasG19 is offline  
Old November 6, 2012, 10:28 PM   #16
Sport45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 25, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,196
I think that's what I said. The bullets won't come out the end any larger than the diameter of the barrel.

I'm not disagreeing with you.
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter.
Sport45 is offline  
Old November 8, 2012, 02:11 PM   #17
Sevens
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
Hey, if'n you guys wanna argue details, than CAST boolits can also vary in weight even if they are EXACTLY the same length and diameter and are complete dimensional copies of each other...

That has to do with the alloy make-up of the bullet.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss.
Sevens is offline  
Old November 8, 2012, 07:50 PM   #18
g.willikers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
And also the design.
A hollow point bullet will be a different length than a solid one, even if both weigh the same.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez:
“Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.”
g.willikers is offline  
Old November 8, 2012, 09:21 PM   #19
wncchester
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2002
Posts: 2,832
we shoot .308,.309,.310,.311 and .312 diameter bullets

It's rare for a .30 cal. barrel groove size to be larger than maybe .3085" and all bullets will be groove size when they have traveled their own lenght.
wncchester is offline  
Old November 8, 2012, 10:05 PM   #20
joneb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2005
Location: Central , OR
Posts: 1,888
I will add that the twist rate of the barrel and the velocity of the projectile determines the RPM of the projectile, longer bullets often heavier are leaving the barrel at a slower velocity and have less rpm's than the higher velocity lighter bullet.
Longer barrels have the ability of producing higher velocities and can stabilize longer bullets better than shorter barrels of the same twist rate, again its the correct rotational speed that stabilizes the bullet.
The military found that a bullet with a higher rotation speed or rpm had a greater wound effect on a soft target.

Last edited by joneb; November 8, 2012 at 10:16 PM.
joneb is offline  
Old November 8, 2012, 10:35 PM   #21
UtopiaTexasG19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Location: S.E. Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 743
Most of us use the "Ranch Dog" molds for our 30-30's and resize to .310 though I agree the lead cast will end up being what ever the smallest diameter is in the lenght of the barrel.
UtopiaTexasG19 is offline  
Old November 8, 2012, 11:54 PM   #22
FloridaVeteran
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2012
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 399
To lighten things up a bit, 180 lbs. on a man is way different than 180 lbs on a woman. But you can't get a man to confirm that, only a woman.
FloridaVeteran is offline  
Old November 9, 2012, 02:07 AM   #23
joneb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2005
Location: Central , OR
Posts: 1,888
Quote:
To lighten things up a bit, 180 lbs. on a man is way different than 180 lbs on a woman. But you can't get a man to confirm that, only a woman.
Are you sayin these pants make my Butt look big
joneb is offline  
Old November 9, 2012, 09:29 AM   #24
elkslayer4x5
Member
 
Join Date: June 30, 2006
Location: Lane County, Oregon
Posts: 66
Quote:
Are you sayin these pants make my Butt look big
Ya know, I think he was......
__________________
"Skin that one out, and I'll get ya another!
elkslayer4x5 is offline  
Old November 9, 2012, 02:17 PM   #25
Marco Califo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,598
Quote:
"Are you sayin these pants make my Butt look big"
No, no, no, . . . not at all.

(Fact is, I don't think the pants are to blame.)
__________________
............
Marco Califo is online now  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09857 seconds with 8 queries