March 9, 2013, 11:23 PM | #1 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Richland Arms maker?
Dragged out a pair of my favorites today to compare them to the newly arrived quad of 1960 Centennials, a matched pair of 1860 Army copies imported by Richland Arms. Uniquely in my collection or Italians, the tops of the BBLs are marked with the "Address Saml Colt, New York" markings, as are th originals and 2nd generation ones. These are a pair of the nicest copies I have ever seen, with great wood, beautiful metal, and excellent finish. Italian proofs but no makers marks other than the Richland marks on the right side of the BBl.
So, who among the usual Italian suspects made these? Willie . |
March 10, 2013, 05:29 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
|
Guys....
Didn't know that Richland Arms imported from ASM, but aren't these the offending Patent infringement versions, ASM got into trouble for?
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath. |
March 10, 2013, 07:43 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
ASM subcontracted to make barrels for the second gens and got stuck with a bunch of them and used them on their own guns until Colt sued them.
|
March 10, 2013, 09:31 AM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
So can we safely assume that this pair is of ASM manufacture "lock, stock, and barrel"?
The fit, finish, wood, and all of the overall quality marks are right there with the 2nd gen colts, and a cut above the Uberti stuff by a very wide margin. Willie . |
March 10, 2013, 11:58 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
The problem with ASM's was soft internal parts that wore quickly but not all of them had soft parts. It was hit or miss as to whether you got a good one or not.
|
|
|