|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 29, 2009, 09:00 PM | #1 | |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Outcome of Oregon Shooting Case
In an earlier post, I erroneously said that a man in Washington State had been charged with murder after shooting a man in his house who had entered while the resident was not in the house.
Memory failed me. The incident occurred in Oregon. After plea bargaining, the charge was reduced from second degree manslaughter to negligent homicide. The victim had entered the shooter's house when the shooter was not home. The shooter's wife discovered the man asleep on the couch and summoned her husband, who returned home, encountered the shooter, shot him fatally, and claimed self defense. Quote:
|
|
June 29, 2009, 09:05 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2008
Location: San Antonio, not San Antone...
Posts: 1,203
|
I remember that incident.
I knew at that time that he had done the wrong thing. This has been discussed at length already but they should have just called police and let the guy sleep until they got there. Now he's a convicted felon. The 19 months in prison isn't the big deal IMO. The bigger deal is having a felony conviction following you around until you die.
__________________
Read this!: I collect .38 Special and .357 Mag cartridges and I will PAY CASH for the headstamps I don't already have! Please PM me. Please donate blood, plasma, and platelets - people's lives literally depend on it. |
June 29, 2009, 09:07 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
|
She had time to get hubby but not enough to call the cops.
|
June 29, 2009, 09:08 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 23, 2009
Location: Nevada
Posts: 644
|
You know, I can't be sure what the effect of Cramer's misstatements to the police ultimately was, but he lied to them. That was *after* he shot the guy, probably while not strictly sober. (Wife had just picked him up at the bar.)
This simply wasn't a self-defense case. I'm glad the DA agreed to the plea deal, because the lies were probably just the panicky nonsense so many people come up with when an unimaginably awful thing happens and they feel blindsided by events, not the cold and calculated attempt of a murderer to avoid justice. But manslaughter or negligent homicide sounds about right to me. (sigh) Yet another illustration of why you simply *don't shoot* except in defense of yourself or innocent other people from a clear threat against life or limb. |
June 30, 2009, 10:53 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
From the description of the victim's position (on the floor, feet on the couch) it sounds like he was still on the couch when he was shot. If so, I'd say Mr. Cramer was pretty lucky to be allowed to plead to negligent homicide, especially if he was under the influence himself at the time, as his coming home from a bar sort of suggests.
Why on earth didn't his wife just call the cops? She left the house to get her husband, but she couldn't just stay away and let the police deal with the situation?? Gads.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
June 30, 2009, 10:56 AM | #6 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Should have been Murder 1.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
June 30, 2009, 11:10 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2007
Posts: 1,041
|
Not sure about Murder I but definitely Murder II and he was lucky with the plea. Sometimes I feel like there are some people walking around and a few on this board just waiting for the chance to shoot someone legally. When you get your tactical Remmy 870 with extended mag, tactical lights, laser sights etc. are you really looking to defend your home or go to war?
This fellow walks in and goes to get his hunting rifle. It wasn't like he was carrying his gun on him. It doesn't give much detail but it appears that to call the ploice would have taken care of it. If he didn't wak up while she went to get her husband he probably wasn't going to wake up until the police got there. |
June 30, 2009, 11:12 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: May 1, 2009
Posts: 48
|
I think the sentence was appropriate. Drunks should be judged the same as sober folks for their actions in public. But in their own home, the standard should be what a reasonable person of the same level of intoxication would do.
It is legal to drink at home, or drink in a bar and safely come home. Likewise, it is legal to take sleeping pills, or allergy pills, or pain meds. It isn't ok to be mentally-altered and go drive a vehicle, but being legally altered and home should be ok. Moreover, people shouldn't forfeit their rights to self-defense and defense of property because they are intoxicated or because they have a mental disease (e.g. diabetic shock, stroke, fever, insomnia). Persons who trespass should bear the major burden of the risks of their trespass, including the risk that a drunk person might respond inappropriately. To a major extent, persons in their own home should be excused from their inappropriate spontanteous and passionate reactions when they took reasonable and appropriate steps to prevent the inciting action from occurring. |
June 30, 2009, 11:21 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,117
|
Quote:
I'll agree with others -- calling the cops would have been the smart thing to do in the first place. Calling the cops would have been smart after dragging her hubby home from the pub. Calling the cops would have been smart when the fistfight began. It just seems to me there was a lack of smarts here.
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately) |
|
June 30, 2009, 11:29 AM | #10 | |||
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
Quote:
spontaneously - ad lib: without advance preparation; "Spontaneous" might be an excuse when somebody kicks your door down. It most certainly is not an excuse when someone is sleeping on your couch, and has been for long enough for your wife to find them and come back to a bar to get you and return home and retrieve your rifle.... Think of it this way: Your wife finds a man sleeping on a park bench. She goes and finds you and you return and kill him. Murder 1? You betcha. Now, is his being in your home UNDER THE EXACT SAME OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES, really that much different? Quote:
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|||
June 30, 2009, 12:21 PM | #11 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Eastern, TN
Posts: 1,236
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
WITHOUT Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech. Silence Dogood Does not morality imply the last clear chance? - WildAlaska - |
|||
June 30, 2009, 12:37 PM | #12 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
Quote:
WildcastlesgonewildAlaska ™ |
|
June 30, 2009, 12:58 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 761
|
Quote:
__________________
"I assert that nothing ever comes to pass without a cause." Jonathan Edwards |
|
June 30, 2009, 01:06 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: May 1, 2009
Posts: 48
|
Peet,
Is it legal to be drunk in public where you live? Is it legal to be drunk in your own home? Different legal standards create different standards of behavior yes. If it is legal to drink in your home, it is legal to drink yourself stupid. Alcohol intoxication is recognized as a (temporary) disease, and our society considers diseases as mitigating factors. If I lock up my house, black out on valu rite vodka, and wake up to find that I've killed 2 burglars in my house - temporary insanity defense or the equivalent. No criminal intent = no crime. If the Oregon shooter killed the guy because he, the shooter, was drunk, no crime. If he killed the guy and happened to be drunk while he did it, crime. Here, his being drunk was obviously considered a factor for adjudication. |
June 30, 2009, 01:21 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Posts: 81
|
Seen those words in threads before haven't we
WildcastlesgonewildAlaska Yes we have.. And yes this person was an intruder. It is that simple to be in a residence unlawfully is to be an intruder. However the level of force used should be in proportion to the level of threat present. In this case a simple call to th cops would have worked. Last edited by MarineCorpsAT; June 30, 2009 at 01:22 PM. Reason: Correcting bad spelling |
June 30, 2009, 01:23 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
|
June 30, 2009, 01:23 PM | #17 | |||
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|||
June 30, 2009, 01:47 PM | #18 |
Junior member
Join Date: August 30, 2004
Location: Right here!
Posts: 972
|
Well, this is proof that (1) folks should know the laws of their state, and (2) a good attorney is priceless.
Personally, I wouldn't convict anyone of shooting an intruder in their home, regardless of the reason. Drunk, crazy, or just plain stupid, if you go in to someone's home uninvited then you're risking your life. And the sooner we get this message in the heads of criminals and idiots who break in to homes, the better off we will all be. |
June 30, 2009, 03:10 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Quote:
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
|
June 30, 2009, 04:22 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Happened to my brother, he was 15, got drunk went to the wrong house, went inside, cops found him eating a bowl of cereal at the table. Cops brought him 4 houses up to our house.
Sometimes, not all the time, but sometimes people make a mistake, should they die for it? I would hope not. Maybe someone needs to mature a little bit, outgrow his childlike ways, put aside his thirst to kill. Everyone has a mom. This is how I think of folks, and then how will their mom feel after her kid is killed for a silly mistake that a call to the cops would have taken care of instead of the morgue? I try to find the way that is best for all, killing or even shooting someone isnt something I really want to do. |
June 30, 2009, 11:38 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 11, 2005
Posts: 114
|
markj's last post...
+1
|
July 1, 2009, 12:13 AM | #22 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,117
|
Quote:
Quote:
There is some omitted information, but we glean that there was a fight of some kind ("He beat me up") which implies that the resident did not simply come home, grab his rifle and start firing. Some kind of contact was made where no lethal force was employed and the resident got his butt kicked. Quite possibly, the deceased may have believed he was fighting a relative or room mate and unaware of his location. Who knows? We also don't know how the resident woke him up (a swift kick or shaking him awake). Assuming the deceased got up swinging and beat the tar out of the resident, it is easy to see how many people would not tolerate someone intruding then using violence against the residents and believe him to be a credible threat. Troubling is the deceased position on the sofa in post-mortem. Without detail it's hard to know if he fell back onto the sofa into a fetal position after being shot OR he tried to return to sleep and curled up on the sofa before being shot. Even if you think the guy had time on his trip home to "premeditate", unless you could show that his initial acts were life-threatening to the deceased, I don't think you'll prove it. He could very well have been thinking "if he gets violent, I'll grab the .270 and blast him" -- but that does not rise to the level of malice aforethought because the alternative (that's implied above) is that if he is non-violent ...what happens? The bum's rush? Again... the folks involved here (all around) reveal an astonishing lack of smarts or common sense.
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately) |
||
July 1, 2009, 01:15 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2008
Location: San Antonio, not San Antone...
Posts: 1,203
|
Quote:
(Stupid) + (Stupid) + (Firearm) = Death or perhaps: (Stupid) + (Drunk) + (Firearm) = Death
__________________
Read this!: I collect .38 Special and .357 Mag cartridges and I will PAY CASH for the headstamps I don't already have! Please PM me. Please donate blood, plasma, and platelets - people's lives literally depend on it. |
|
July 1, 2009, 10:27 AM | #24 | |
Member
Join Date: May 1, 2009
Posts: 48
|
Pizza killer,
Search under 'voluntary intoxication' and 'diminished capacity'. This will start you off http://www.courts.state.md.us/ble/gb...alysis7-08.wpd Quote:
http://law.jrank.org/pages/1142/Excu...oxication.html http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/nyregister.htm http://www.ncids.org/Defender%20Trai...-LisaMiles.pdf If you can find the what the judge wrote for the Oregon case, I'm sure it will discuss the issue of voluntary intoxication. Last edited by A_McDougal; July 1, 2009 at 10:33 AM. |
|
July 1, 2009, 10:41 AM | #25 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Maybe I'm a little dense, and I'm no lawyer, but I don't see how any of those laws would actually be helpful for the homeowner. In fact, it would appear as though at least some of the wording would be bad for him, by specifically excluding actions taken where voluntary intoxication is involved or requiring for the level of intoxication to be so high as to preclude rational thought.
Specifically how do you see these laws helping the homeowner?
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
|