|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 14, 2001, 10:32 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2000
Posts: 1,528
|
000 buck any better than 00?
Just grabbed a box of 000buck from Wal-Mart. Is there any advantage rangewise to 000?
__________________
SPQR |
October 14, 2001, 11:23 AM | #2 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 13, 1999
Location: Columbia, Md, USA
Posts: 8,811
|
A qualified maybe. The slightly bigger pellets may retain energy better, but my guts tell me it's more a theoretical advantage than an actual one.
The big question is, "How does it pattern?". No buckshot is a long range load. |
October 15, 2001, 02:21 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 26, 2001
Posts: 155
|
It depends on the gun. With my Win. Defender with 000 patterns better than 00, but the Rem 870 that I used to have it was 00 all the way. Pattern with both and stay with the best one.
|
October 15, 2001, 08:33 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 28, 1999
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 560
|
I really like the 12ga. 2.75", 8 pellet 000 load over the 9 pellet 00 buck shot loading. My theory is that there is one less pellet that may be "thrown" off target if something goes wrong.
Not a great reason to switch over totally from 00 but it works for me. (I actually still use 00 buckshot loads more than 000 loads) It a coin toss over which ones I get. If both are the same price or close then I go with the 00. Like Dave, I'm a huge 870 fan and find that my 870 with 18" cylinder barrel patterns both loads about the same. As to the ballistics. Here's some quick numbers I ran. 000 buck is .36" in dia and weighs in at about 70.5 grs per pellet 00 buck is .33" in dia and weighs in at about 54.7 grs per pellet At 1,200 FPS these loads produce 225 and 175 FT LBS of energy per pellet. Rob
__________________
NRA & NAHC Life Member |
October 15, 2001, 11:29 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2000
Posts: 1,528
|
So far it doesn't look like their is a huge differance, but I think I'll do some more experamenting with the 000.
__________________
SPQR |
October 15, 2001, 02:13 PM | #6 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 13, 1999
Location: Columbia, Md, USA
Posts: 8,811
|
It's worth a try, Shin. It's possibly the tightest patterning and effective load of its type. Only range testing can determine that.
Let us know, will you? Thanks... |
October 16, 2001, 01:37 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 23, 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,576
|
I like them but have never needed them for real.
They pattern well for my Beretta 1201fp & Rem. 870 Marine Mag. I use Federal Tactical reduced loads from www.ammoman.com. they aren't as punishing and I like the idea of bigger, heavier pellets. I know it's unscientific but for me, "bigger holes = more pain" |
October 16, 2001, 03:59 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: February 2, 2001
Posts: 39
|
CWL,
I'm a little confused by your reply. Is "OOO" not bigger than "OO"? Beacuse from what I have seen the Fed. Tactical is all "OO" Buckshot. B. |
October 16, 2001, 05:21 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2000
Location: SE PA
Posts: 1,049
|
I have Fed. Tactical in 00, 000 & #4. I also get mine from www.ammoman.com .
Mike
__________________
"Freedom is not free" Visit TheRallyPoint.org TheRallyPoint at LRGC- Saturday August 26th IF YOU LIVE IN PA AND DID NOT VOTE, YOU DESERVE TO LOSE YOUR GUNS! |
October 16, 2001, 06:01 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: February 2, 2001
Posts: 39
|
9mmMike - I learn something new every day. I didn't know the tactical came in anything other than OO.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|