August 29, 2019, 10:02 AM | #51 | |||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
You seem to beleive that you can prove a negative. I do not understand what it is that makes you believe that something that happens in the criminal justice system would impinge upon a case of tort law. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
August 29, 2019, 10:13 AM | #52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
|
August 29, 2019, 10:29 AM | #53 | ||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
Quote:
The court was the Alabama Supreme Court. The Florida law is written exactly the same way. The two kind of immunity come from pretrial hearings in different courts |
||
August 29, 2019, 10:32 AM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
|
August 29, 2019, 10:44 AM | #55 | ||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
But the appeal of the "Saban Case" was decided on its own merits and had nothing to do with the criminal procedure. The Justia Opinion Summary said this: Quote:
They were, of course referring to immunity provisions, and not to SYG. The latter has only to do with a duty to retreat. Odd to find such an authoritative source propogating that common error. |
||
August 29, 2019, 11:00 AM | #56 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
That isn't what the opinion stated or even implied. Emphasis added. The ruling could not state that because there never was a criminal case at all. And because there was no criminal case there was no ruling. Therefore the ASC tried to examine the actions to determine if Saban's actions were unlawful. They found issues and therefore remanded. They stated in the ruling they had no opinion on the immunity itself.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. Last edited by MTT TL; August 29, 2019 at 11:43 AM. |
|
September 5, 2019, 08:31 PM | #57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 22, 2017
Posts: 1,011
|
Quote:
|
|
March 21, 2020, 02:28 AM | #58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2013
Posts: 113
|
Years ago my neighbor's dogs attacked me numerous times. One time I chased the dog off my property. The neighbor then assaulted me. I beat him up. When the 1st officer arrived on the scene I asked if I'd done anything wrong & he assured me I had not. The assistant state's attorney I spoke with said I was the good guy & had done the right thing. Later the neighbor attempted to intimidate me by exiting his front door & walking to the edge of the walk every time I'd walk by his house, causing me to have to look over my shoulder as I passed to make sure he didn't jump me. I asked the police what to do should he ever block my path & was told to tell him to get out of the way once. If he didn't I was to pepper spray him & to do so without hesitation. I was told our county's state's attorney would never prosecute me in this situation. Fast forward: Recently while working in another jurisdiction a man assaulted me, violated my space & while right on top of me verbally threatened to beat me up. I sprayed him. The prosecutor treated both of us as criminals threatening to send my case to trial for battery. My attorney called her decision ridiculous saying I'd given the guy what he deserved. The rep @ the Armed Citizens' Legal Defense Network said the same. I would think that had that incident occurred in my home county the sa would have never done what this prosecutor did. ..different jurisdictions. ..different prosecutors. ..different mindsets. ACLDN gave me the option to choose an attorney or to allow them to do so. ACLDN paid the legal bill & agreed to do so without hesitation.
__________________
[If you tell the same lie enough times people will eventually believe it. Joseph Goebbels You are not ready for meat--you are still on the bottle. Stacy Washington: aka, Stacy On the Right] |
May 23, 2020, 11:47 AM | #59 |
Member
Join Date: February 7, 2020
Location: Coastal North Carolina
Posts: 52
|
I don't like "carry insurance". It will lead to the insurance industry dictating carry policy and the politicians already owned by them will gladly go along with whatever is proposed.
Insurance is a good way to ensure your loss of 2A rights and burden you with unwanted restrictions. |
May 23, 2020, 12:04 PM | #60 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,215
|
Quote:
It will only lead to it dictating carrying if it becomes mandatory. I don’t know anywhere where it is currently mandatory. If you don’t want it then you’re free to not get it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|