|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 27, 2013, 01:34 AM | #26 | |
Member
Join Date: April 23, 2013
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
|
|
April 29, 2013, 08:41 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 246
|
I got a SR9c last month. Agree with many other posters, it has an excellent trigger, and the mag features out of the box are very nice. Love it as a carry gun. Only downside so far is the chance of a snag particularly on the lefty side of the ambidextrous safety. Overall, no regrets. Did not look at M&P. Ruger was available and price was competitive.
|
April 29, 2013, 10:39 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,214
|
In my area the M&P is only $50 more at $500 as opposed to $450.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture Maintain situational awareness |
May 2, 2013, 04:19 PM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: September 21, 2012
Location: The United States
Posts: 95
|
One reason I prefer the SR9c is due to its Glock style safe action trigger. And given that it seems to be a bit more narrow in the slide and it's cheaper!
I can't wait to get one and the get myself a CrossBreed Appendix Carry for it! Now, another question: is carrying two 17 round magazines overkill? I think that would be great! Man, I am so excited about getting this!
__________________
"Those who would sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."- Benjamin Franklin |
May 3, 2013, 12:18 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 4, 2012
Posts: 1,273
|
When I carry my CZ-75, I generally have a loaded mag in the gun, 2 loaded mags either on my belt or in my car, and a round in the chamber. And that doesn't count any BUG I may or may not have...
In short, no. |
May 3, 2013, 12:37 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
|
I LOVE the feel of the full-size M&P, and can't stand the M&P Compact. Amazed that a slightly short grip changes it for me so much.
The SR9c, on the other hand, is extremely comfortable for me. Quality is there in both, but I prefer the lack of safeties on the M&P. Hard choice if they both fit you well.
__________________
16 Pistols, 5 Rifles, 1 Shotgun, no time to shoot them |
May 16, 2013, 06:25 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 8, 2000
Location: Kansas Hill Country
Posts: 449
|
Ruger SR9c, DO IT!!!
For all the reasons already stated, take it from this ol' shooter, go Ruger. You won't be sorry.
Kurt.
__________________
"No free man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government." --Thomas Jefferson |
May 16, 2013, 06:46 PM | #33 |
Member
Join Date: March 10, 2013
Posts: 97
|
They're both great guns. My buddy carries the Ruger, and I carry the Smith. I'm comfortable shooting either one. I chose the M&P because I knew i would eventually buy a Shield 9 for warmer weather carry. Now that I have both, I'm totally content with my carry guns.
|
May 20, 2013, 11:42 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Posts: 4,092
|
M&P 9c-that grip is SOOO NICE.
You could run +p+'s in it (not recommended by the factory) and control it-probably. Smith got those grips spot on for my hand. Biggest advance in handgun grips I've seen in my lifetime so far. |
May 21, 2013, 09:39 AM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 2, 2005
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 398
|
Quote:
However, I think of the two you're asking about, the SR9c would be an easier carry due to it's overall slimmer feel. I recently had a SR9 but sold it to fund my M&P full size since I wanted to build on the M&P platform. It was a great feeling pistol in the hand. |
|
|
|