|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 24, 2008, 05:37 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Posts: 79
|
which is better ?3x9x40 or 50mm or 4x12x40 or 50mm
Hi buying a scope for new rifle i am going to buy looks like i am down to these powers any suggestions. I will be hunting deer and elk in new mexico
|
March 24, 2008, 06:36 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
If you are hunting in a place where your shots are going to be long shots, I'd go 4x12 50mm. If you are shooting in wooded areas where a long shot is under 50 yards, I'd go 3x9.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
March 24, 2008, 07:18 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Posts: 79
|
is there even a big difference between these scopes
|
March 24, 2008, 07:29 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: The Woodlands TX
Posts: 4,679
|
Is weight a factor? The 50mm objective adds a considerable amount of weight, but doesn't utilize the exit pupil increase under typical hunting magnifications.
What's your anticipated shooting distance? If it's inside your MPBR I'd stick with the 3-9x40. If you like shooting at higher power then you *might* see a benefit from the bigger scope.
__________________
la plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas! |
March 24, 2008, 11:09 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Posts: 79
|
its up in the mountains in new mexico my shot could be anywhere from 75 yards to about 250-300
|
March 24, 2008, 11:27 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 27, 2006
Posts: 1,559
|
For 75 - 300 yds a 3-9X40 will be perfect for deer and elk. It's not to heavy and bulky, and will mount closer to the action so your cheek will rest against the stock.
|
March 25, 2008, 06:22 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: The Woodlands TX
Posts: 4,679
|
I agree with the previous rec. With young eyes one can only dilate the pupil ~7mm. At 5-6 power you still retain all useful exit pupil from the scope. At 300 yards 5-6 power should feel like 50 yards unscoped. I imagine you would find the added weight from a 50mm objective to be more of a hinderence than a help. If you were really looking for a light weight set up a 2-7x33 would have max usable pupil size with a magnification of almost 5 power. OTOH The 50mm gives a 7mm exit at 7 power. Small and unneeded increase of power for a large increase of weight.
My parents moved to Ruidoso about 10 years ago. Before that I spent my childhood traipsing around the state. Sure is pretty out there.
__________________
la plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas! |
March 25, 2008, 10:18 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Posts: 79
|
yeha iw ent to sprtssman warehouse last night to look at soem scopes i liked the bushnell 3200 series the 4x12x40 was 399.99 but it had ballistic sights is ballistic sights that much on an advantage over regular sights there was 100 difference in the same power scope
|
March 25, 2008, 01:56 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: The Woodlands TX
Posts: 4,679
|
Quote:
__________________
la plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas! |
|
March 25, 2008, 03:02 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2005
Posts: 646
|
A 3X9X40 is all the scope you need. You don't need more magnification, weight or bulk.........Essex
|
|
|