The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Curios and Relics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 23, 2013, 07:06 PM   #1
Boberama
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2010
Posts: 189
15mm pinfire & 577 "solid" velocities?

So apparently the "standard" load for both of these was 28 grains of "pistol powder" under a 450-grain hollow-base bullet... in some pinfire loads the charge was even smaller.


So, just out of sheer curiosity...


What kind of velocities do you think these would have?


I've read one source that claims 725 fps, but that seems suspiciously high to me, given only 28 grains of black powder with such a heavy bullet!



I've also seen someone who actually loaded for one, they posted that 42.5 grains of Goex FFFg under a 457-grain bullet gave them 680 fps.





So... 28 grains of "pistol powder"... maybe 600 - 625 fps? Or even lower? What do you think?
__________________
I just try to be really, really honest with people when I think that they suck. - Santana Lopez, Glee
Boberama is offline  
Old June 24, 2013, 01:52 AM   #2
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Pistol powder was likely FFFg, and velocity was probably below 500 fps. As a comparison, a 50 Remington M71 fired a 300 gr lead bullet at 600 fps propelled by 25 gr of FFg. So approximately same amount of powder, heavier bullet, that pretty much means lower velocity.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old June 24, 2013, 12:52 PM   #3
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,374
Agree. No way velocity was even remotely close to 725.

I suspect 550ish, if that.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old June 24, 2013, 07:25 PM   #4
Boberama
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2010
Posts: 189
A couple more things I've found... this one from some Dutch forum I believe:



Apparently the author of whatever book that photo comes from thought 550 ft/s was appropriate.

As well, some similar bullet weights/charges

40 gr musket powder (FFg?) in the Springfield pistol-carbine gave about 600 ft/s with a 468 grain bullet (1860s ballistic pendulum).

30 gr FFG in the 1855 Harper's Ferry pistol-carbine gave 577 ft/s with a 525 grain bullet (modern chronograph).

However both of those have 12-inch barrels, and it's FFg instead of FFFg. In any case I guess somewhere from 500-600 ft/s sounds about right to me for the .577 from a revolver.




In "The Webley Story", Eley and Kynoch 15mm pinfire cartridges are said to only have 21 grains of powder, I suppose that could put them as low as 450-480 ft/s! However another source shows Eley loaded at least some of their 15mm pinfire with the same 28 grains of powder as the .577 cartridge.


Also I should mention the guy who owns the .577 mentioned in the first post said that he had reduced his loads to 600 ft/s for fear of damaging such a rare piece.
__________________
I just try to be really, really honest with people when I think that they suck. - Santana Lopez, Glee

Last edited by Boberama; June 24, 2013 at 07:35 PM.
Boberama is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04992 seconds with 10 queries