|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 25, 2008, 08:10 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 625
|
If it was gotten in the 70's, then No, there is no chance of that being the case. Those were all late '80 at the earliest.
|
April 25, 2008, 08:18 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 13, 2007
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,220
|
I do have a "Devine, TX" M1A from circa 1972, but those are clearly marked, "M1A." Maunz produced rifles sometime in the late '70's, but I don't recall how they were marked.
However, if a PD, it's 99 44/100% certain to be a live USGI M14. Regards, Walt
__________________
Author, NEW! The M1911 Complete Owner's Guide The M14 and M1 Garand Complete Assembly Guides The M1 Garand Complete Assembly Guide The AR-15 Complete Assembly and (New 4th Edition) Owner's Guides |
April 25, 2008, 08:33 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2006
Location: Amerika's Doyleland
Posts: 809
|
Put your old cop buddy in contact with David. He's been in the NFA game for a while now, and I'm confident he'll figure out teh deal with the M14.
|
April 26, 2008, 01:42 AM | #29 |
Junior Member
Join Date: April 9, 2008
Posts: 7
|
Thanks for all the input from everyone. I will pass along all the info.
|
April 26, 2008, 11:56 PM | #30 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2, 2007
Posts: 13
|
You could also try if your buddy buddy with the sheriff to deputize you and allow you to purchase the weapon. Out here that isn't that far fetched and still is considered legal unless you lose the "badge". I found this out from a guy who didn't want to pay like 15K plus for an MP5 and found out if he did it that way it would have been just something like 2K. Can't verify, but just like certain body armor, if you can get an leo or mil to sign off on it, you can buy it.
|
April 27, 2008, 08:35 AM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
Quote:
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
|
April 27, 2008, 12:13 PM | #32 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2, 2007
Posts: 13
|
One it's not dangerous. Two it's not wrong prove it. The sheriff here has the option of doing that and if you know him and he knows you (especially with class IIIs and all) he can legally do that. I stand corrected when you show me how that is wrong or dangerous. This guy would not do anybody but a select few and it never hurts to ask worst he says is no. Just like having him sign off to order body armor. How is that wrong and dangerous? This is super rural VA though. At least stay chill and explain why instead of VERY DANGEROUS VERY WRONG....(but won't say why). Why respond then?
|
April 27, 2008, 12:28 PM | #33 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2005
Location: NWFL
Posts: 3,031
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/faq2.htm Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
April 27, 2008, 02:57 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
OK, you asked for it....
Dangerous- a person can and will be prosecuted for tax evasion, and illegal posession of a machinegun if the scenario you posted turned out to be true. The sheriff or cheif or whomever would also be charged with conspiracy to commit tax evason and illegal transfer of a title II firearm. There is more than one 'loophole' way to own title II firearms, but a wise person wouldn't do any of it. A Sheriff cannot simply say 'presto' you're my deputy, and here's an MP5! What would you tell an ATF agent if you happened to encounter one and they asked to see your paperwork. It would be something like '.....uh, I'm Sheriff Buford's special deputy and this is my duty weapon...' And then you would be in for a trip to the pen. AND... I can reference a similar case RIGHT HERE IN INDIANA! The sheriff of Grant County (I belive it was Grant) was just indicted and prosecuted for a very similar type of scandal. He was buying back department weapons from the local .gov for very minimal $$ and then selling them for personal profit. It all appeared legit on the surface, but now a once respectable man is an inmate in a system that he once ran.... ETA: I am 100% sick of these scenarios dealing with 'free' or 'loophole' ways to own NFA items. It is this kind of stupid selfish immature behavior that may get it ruined for the rest of us law-abiding NFA owners. That may be harsh, but, damn, pay your $200 tax and GET OVER IT. If you don't like that $800 M16's are selling for $20k, then WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMAN!
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! Last edited by VUPDblue; April 27, 2008 at 05:06 PM. |
April 28, 2008, 01:44 PM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
Here's one from this year, just for giggles...
Quote:
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
|
April 28, 2008, 02:59 PM | #36 |
Junior Member
Join Date: April 9, 2008
Posts: 7
|
WOW. This started as a basic question. Apparently it is NOT legal to own a M14 with a selector lock even if it was bought from a dept. and and then sold as a semi-auto by an officer to a civi.
But what it also tells me, is the DOD is not keeping track of it's property. The police can and do dispose of DOD property as they see fit. If the DOD started inventory in 2002.. how long does it take to find out they are missing a few? It seems the only one's playing by the rules are the civilians. As for myself I was'nt interested in the piece, I collect knives not guns. LT |
April 28, 2008, 08:53 PM | #37 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
It doesn't matter if DoD did or did not "lose track" of a gun, some gun, or all of them. If an individual is found with an M14, he will be arrested, indicted and possibly imprisoned. In one case I know of, a three star general testified that the Army had NEVER released ANY M14 rifles for civilian sale, period. And that, therefore, ANY GI M14 in civilian hands was not only illegal, but stolen property, period.
So who will a judge or jury believe? An Army general, or Joe Slob, who says he bought the M14 from his cop cousin, and that the guys on some web site said it is OK? If he is lucky, he gets probation, but no matter what, he is a felon who can never again own any kind of gun except an antique. Jim |
April 28, 2008, 09:22 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 26, 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 144
|
machine gun
for it to be a machine gun, it must fire automatic. if it's semi-auto only.... it's semi-auto only, and there aren't issues.... you said this was a semi auto m14. so it's just a cool gun, not a class 3 weapon, unless the barrel is chopped.
|
April 28, 2008, 09:59 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 625
|
No, most M14s were locked to shoot semi only, but are still machine guns. The ATF, backed up by case law, considers any gun that was ever a machinegun to be a machinegun and subject to the registry, or contraband.
|
April 28, 2008, 11:57 PM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 13, 2007
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,220
|
Quote:
Regards, Walt
__________________
Author, NEW! The M1911 Complete Owner's Guide The M14 and M1 Garand Complete Assembly Guides The M1 Garand Complete Assembly Guide The AR-15 Complete Assembly and (New 4th Edition) Owner's Guides |
|
April 29, 2008, 01:04 AM | #41 |
Junior Member
Join Date: April 9, 2008
Posts: 7
|
Mr. Keenan,
If you would have bothered to read my last post, I said my question was answered, NO ONE CAN BUY OR SELL A USGI M14.. As to the DOD not keeping track? Not my problem. Go back to the first post and see who was trying to sell the item. |
April 29, 2008, 01:17 AM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2001
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,166
|
Quote:
It is NOT now, nor has it EVER been (since the closing of the NFA register) legal to do as you suggest, ANYWHERE, here in the United States. Can an individual LEO purchase a fully automatic firearm? Yes, without a doubt. HOWEVER, they still have to jump through ALL the hoops that a non-LEO would have to. This includes FULL compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local laws. As an example, I live in WA State--which means that I cannot legally own full auto, SBS/SBR or AOW, EVEN as a police officer for private use. Can an individual LEO purchase a full-auto as a DUTY gun? Yes--and it CAN be of recent manufacture, and of any current model. HOWEVER... The firearm will be NON-TRANSFERABLE. The firearm MUST be purchased on Department letterhead, with the Chief's signature, and MUST be used as a duty weapon. Here's the important part... WHEN the officer leaves the Department, the FA firearm MUST REMAIN WITH THE DEPARTMENT, unless the officer is rehired by another Department, AND they agree to a transfer of custody between Departments. If the LEO leaves the law enforcement profession--as in fully sworn police officer, THEY LOSE THE FIREARM, WITHOUT HOPE OF COMPENSATION OR REIMBURSEMENT. Even though this is legal, I have NEVER heard of ANY Department in the United States approving the private purchase of a full auto firearm by an individual officer for duty use. As far as being "buddy buddy" with the Sheriff, and having them "deputize" you for this purpose, there are so many things ethically wrong--and ILLEGAL--about that statement that I won't even comment on them. |
|
May 12, 2008, 09:15 AM | #43 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 11, 2008
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
|
|
May 17, 2008, 08:55 PM | #44 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2, 2007
Posts: 13
|
Powderman and VUPD chill. The buddy buddy thing was taking out and beaten like a dead horse. If you ARE WILLING TO become a true deputy and uphold that position not just for the gun and can get that weapon in the process why not. You totally misread that or I wrote it wrong. If I asked to due that I would in fact BE a deputy and fulfill my duties as one, not get a hook up like the deputy **** your talking about that happens out in Cali and stuff that I read on the War on Guns blog. Relax and have a calm conversation, it does wonders and keeps people around to discuss. This is one reason I hear so many people say they stay away from forums. You can't "read" a person through text so don't assume and start a calm discussion and go from there. Geez
|
May 18, 2008, 12:17 AM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2001
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,166
|
Sorry if I offended.
When I read something along the lines of using your badge or position for personal gain, or signing up to be a cop just so you can get to shoot cool stuff, it raises my blood pressure somewhat. Again, sorry if I offended you. |
May 18, 2008, 07:09 AM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
Quote:
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
|
May 18, 2008, 05:46 PM | #47 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2008
Location: new york
Posts: 11
|
I don't care what it is, it truly is and always will be a beautiful rifle. IMHO, it is the best "battle rifle" ever made, hands down!!
|
May 3, 2009, 12:36 AM | #48 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Posts: 1
|
I've not used bulletin boards on the internet much; in fact I just recently started searching these firearm boards. I am currently a Criminal Justice student with a emphasis on Law Enforcement, and hold two suppressors that I purchased both of which have their own tax form. I am asking about buying a SWD M11:
The article says that this gun is civilian transferable gun so I assume that it's pre 1986. I am only getting this for sport and fun (not even hunting), and I will make sure that I get the tax stamps (one for gun, one for suppressor) approved by my local PD chief before I put the money down on the weapon (which is 4k). I just want to make sure that I am going through this process legally because I have always strived to keep my record pristine and as a student I recognize the law to its utmost. I have two suppressors already that I had no problem getting after a three month wait. So, any advice will be much appreciated - even if its to tell me that it not possible to own one of these weapons. I have read about owning pre86 SMGs for individuals of my state, South Carolina, and found out that as long as you pay the $200 tax stamd you can buy any pre86 machine gun, and even destructive devices as long as you get that $200 stamp for each mortar or grenade. As you can expect that adds up to ALOT of taxes. I anly want a sport gun that runs through rounds to have fun with and hone my skills on my own 1,000 acre property. By doing this will I be inside the law still? |
May 10, 2009, 09:39 AM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
If it's a transferable, the process to obtain it is the exact same as the process you went through to get your suppressors.
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
May 10, 2009, 11:42 AM | #50 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Certified Instructor: Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Home Safety, Personal Protection, Range Safety Officer NRA Life Member |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|