The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 7, 2018, 10:34 AM   #26
Wyosmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,506
"Good" is a slippery term. It means different things to different people.
However bad, real bad and extremely bad are easier to speak to. They suck, some worse than others.

Any "good" trigger is a HUGE advantage over a really bad trigger in shooting precise shots.

The difference between a good "DCM grade military match trigger" and a set trigger may be little or none, depending on who is doing the shooting. But the difference between either one of them and a 8 pound gritty trigger with a 1/16th inch of over-travel is like night and day.
Wyosmith is offline  
Old September 7, 2018, 10:34 AM   #27
stephen426
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2005
Posts: 3,511
I qualified at the Marksman level for high-power matches (brand new to the sport) with a post-ban (no flash suppressor, bayonet lug, or collapsible stock) Colt Ar-15 HBAR. I wonder how much better I could have done if I had better sights and a better trigger. Some of the other guys were shooting "tricked out" ARs with cryo treated barrels and tiny peep sights. Eyes aren't nearly as good now, so every little bit helps.

I have always been a believer that good sights and good triggers really improve accuracy. It is much easier to have good trigger control with a light, smooth, crisp trigger. Even with extensive training and practice, I think the same shooter should shoot more consistently with the better trigger.
__________________
The ATF should be a convenience store instead of a government agency!
stephen426 is offline  
Old September 8, 2018, 08:08 AM   #28
Mobuck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,264
It rained all day yesterday so I swapped out a couple of "crunch and drag" fire control groups. I dug through my parts box and found an AR Stoner "enhanced trigger group".
Just my opinion:this isn't a big improvement over a "good" mil-spec FCG. It's not even close to an ALG "ACT" and still below the PSA "EPT" or ALG "QMS".
I haven't installed my new LaRue and somewhere I have a self contained unit I'm going to stuff into a new lower for use with a 20" Grendel upper.
Mobuck is offline  
Old September 9, 2018, 11:39 AM   #29
Wag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2010
Location: Rio Rancho, NM
Posts: 663
Really glad I saw this thread this morning. Makes me realize I don't know crap about triggers or trigger control. Well, maybe I do, because I tend to shoot okay from the bench. But I've only really ever used factory stuff.

My M&P 15, for example, it strictly stock trigger and I shoot fine with it. But now I'm thinking I may want to test a better trigger.

All the input here is greatly appreciated.

--Wag--
__________________
"Great genius will always encounter fierce opposition from mediocre minds." --Albert Einstein.
Wag is offline  
Old September 9, 2018, 04:58 PM   #30
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,527
It's interesting to see the history of triggers . What had been a 'fair' trigger in the past might now be an very good one today !
A 30 second squeeze seems bizarre to me as I trained myself in combat pistol matches to shoot with a ' fast squeeze " Yes there are both fast and slow squeezes and they can be learned . I would want to learn and us the fast and slow squeezes in hunting or combat .I would never today permit anyone to do a trigger job on my guns .
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver !
mete is offline  
Old September 10, 2018, 07:09 AM   #31
BWM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2013
Location: SW IN
Posts: 389
I do NOT like a 2 stage trigger or any trigger over 4lb so I have replaced all of them with Timney & Velocity single stage 3lb 31/2lb and one 4lb very crisp triggers and very clean brake I am 78 years young and it has help my shooting by going from 1in to less than 1/2in at 100 yards with good hand loads
__________________
Man that likes guns. Navy. USS Ponchatoula AO 148 USS Vesuvius AE 15
BWM is offline  
Old September 10, 2018, 07:22 AM   #32
Mobuck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,264
With a very light pull trigger, a shooter may turn into a trigger "snatcher" rather than a trigger "squeezer". This may work fine for hunting but won't make the grade in competition(unless you're VERY good at it) nor will it give the best groups when using a bench.
Mobuck is offline  
Old September 10, 2018, 07:58 AM   #33
zeke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 672
Switching out a bad trigger can make a significant difference. Like some, prefer a clean 2 stage with about 3-4 lb clean break. Am preferring the clean break over the lightness.
zeke is offline  
Old September 10, 2018, 08:16 AM   #34
Ricklin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Location: SW Washington state
Posts: 1,344
Like everyone else

Like most everyone else here, I shoot better groups with a good trigger.

It's interesting to note that a really good shooter (not me) will not be impacted as much by a "good trigger" as will the average Joe.

I see a lot of folks post about how they shoot their 1911 better than other pistols. Duhh... Most 1911's have comparatively good or at least decent triggers.
I think a lot of the popularity of the 1911 can be attributed to the single action trigger.

Again painting with a broad brush it takes a lot more time, experience, and practice to become a decent marksman with a handgun vs. a rifle. The 1911 pattern and it's single action trigger make it an easier pistol to shoot well.
__________________
ricklin
Freedom is not free
Ricklin is offline  
Old September 10, 2018, 10:15 PM   #35
5whiskey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 2,810
Quote:
Of course everyone is a little different but it has been an article of faith among shooters (and gunwriters) for longer than I have been alive (and probably a couple times over) that most people can shoot more accurately with crappy sights and a good trigger than they can with good sights and a crappy trigger.
I would be the exception to that rule. I like good triggers, but I can usually shoot a standard trigger nearly as well. As others have said, I must concentrate a good deal more on good trigger pull, but can shoot well with a standard trigger. Give me good sights though. Especially if we're talking iron sights.
__________________
Support the NRA-ILA Auction, ends 03/09/2018

https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=593946
5whiskey is offline  
Old October 1, 2018, 10:00 AM   #36
Shootrj2003
Member
 
Join Date: August 12, 2007
Posts: 15
Really,should it be a surprise that a good trigger is maybe not neccesary for shooting but is a no.1 assist to fine shooting?however, while the rifles I shot in the Marines were not ,perhaps match grade,I never had a gritty hard trigger either,if we did it was quickly resolved by our armorer,I shot sharpshooter with the m14 and m16a2and expert with my .45 -with weapons I carried every day some were pretty old but well maintained,(.45's) some were made by Mattel (m16s) but well maintained also.C1/2 1st Bn 2nd Mar. 2 nd Mar Div.
Shootrj2003 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07182 seconds with 8 queries