|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 20, 2009, 12:19 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 29, 2008
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 10
|
Forster Co-Ax Press? Is This Normal?
I recently received a new Forster Co-Ax press. I found the lower part of the two steel guide rods heavily scratched and gouged (IMHO). See pic. Some of the marks are deep enough to catch your fingernail on. The press appears to operate normally.
I contacted Forster, sent them the pic seen here, and they wanted the unit returned to them. They called and said not as bad as they thought, press works fine, and basically said it was OK. They will replace rods, but still, their attitude that is was not so bad surprised me. Forster said the rods are like hydraulic cylinder rams and scratches show up easily. The damage is not from operation, as the marks go clear to the end of the rods where nothing touches them. Any Forster owners care to comment on what they see here on 36A. 42A is the other end of the rods and these are pretty clean. - Phil |
November 20, 2009, 12:25 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, TEXAS
Posts: 909
|
Hmmm... I never noticed that on mine. Doesn't look too serious though. Don't sweat it; you're gonna love that press. In my opinion, it is the best, most well designed single stage press on the market. No other press comes close.
|
November 20, 2009, 12:31 AM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 29, 2008
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 10
|
If you don't mind, could you tell me if yours is like mine? I am just trying to establish if what I am seeing is the norm. I am brand new to reloading and not sure what to expect on tools such as this. Obviously they are not going to be flawlessly machined everywhere, but I expected more than this.
Note the marks at the very end of the rods, which is a part that does not go through the frame. - Phil |
November 20, 2009, 12:54 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, TEXAS
Posts: 909
|
I just went out to the garage to take a look, and no, mine is not like that.
|
November 20, 2009, 01:38 AM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 29, 2008
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 10
|
I expect the rods on your Co-Ax look like the 42A pic? - Phil
|
November 20, 2009, 02:13 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: August 13, 2009
Posts: 76
|
Looks like the operator assembling your press dragged the rod over something gritty or perhaps dropped it and stood on it etc. He then gave it a wipe and got on with the job.
Its not pretty for a new item and should not have gone out, but they are replacing the rods - sorted! I guess its what you get for buying a press that was made by a human being Dont let this put you off Forster gear - all the bits I have are well made and function excellently. |
November 20, 2009, 02:51 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: September 24, 2009
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 58
|
You are worrying about nothing significant. It's not a showpiece. Load up some really accurate ammo and fuhgedaboudit.
|
November 20, 2009, 03:21 AM | #8 | ||
Member
Join Date: June 11, 2009
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
Quote:
Seems there is at least 1 in every company that takes no pride in their work. And it reflects poorly on the company as a whole even one with a stellar reputation for quality products like Forster. ST
__________________
Parasite On Society : / |
||
November 20, 2009, 12:39 PM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 29, 2008
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 10
|
It is not possible to illustrate in a photo, but some of the marks in the rod are so deep, it could not possibly be caused by dropping the rod and stepping on it or some other minor incident. Besides, the other rod looks similar, albeit not quite as bad. The scarring is fairly deep, with some gouges not even in line with the rod...they run off at angles (see the pic). Honestly, it looks like they were forced through a tight bore with sand in it.
Unfortunately, this is another example of too many firearm parts I have purchased over the last year with poor quality control which had to be returned. - Phil |
November 20, 2009, 01:15 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: October 26, 2009
Posts: 74
|
I don't own a Forster press so I can't compare.
Those scratches do look quite deep from what I can see and if I had received a new press in that condition I would not be happy. I hope it all works out to your satisfaction. |
November 20, 2009, 04:24 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2007
Location: Tabor City , NC.
Posts: 1,969
|
probably happened when the cold rolled stock was extruded & was deeper than the finishing polishing could remove.
2 cent worth , I would have wanted em replaced to . especially after spending $$ for a new 1. 3 cent worth!!
__________________
GP100man |
November 21, 2009, 10:22 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2005
Location: Arlington TX
Posts: 663
|
Mine does not look like that. As long as the scratches were created before polishing, they should be OK and not cause any problems with accuracy or longevity. In other words, a cosmetic defect.
Enjoy your new press, it is a fantastic one, cosmetic defects and all. Andy |
|
|