|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 1, 2018, 06:06 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
|
Suppressing a very light 20“ hunting rifle: .223 over .308?
Hi Folks,
I am about to order a Merkel K3 break action rifle for the stalking part of my hunting: https://www.merkel-die-jagd.de/en/pr...sr-k3-extreme/ I will put on a light scope (Swarovski Z6i 1,7-10x42). https://www.swarovskioptik.com/hunti...-plex-p5006370 I also want a light but effective suppressor. For the game this rifle is for, the calibers .223 and .308 will be fine. So I wonder: Which of these two calibers (.223, .308) will be easier to suppress with a 20” barrel and a light suppressor? The task of the suppressor here is to protect my own and my dogs hearing. For the .223 I am contemplating about this suppressor, A-Tec 119 Hertz: http://www.a-tec.no/rifle/a-tec-119-hertz
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum If you want peace - prepare for war Last edited by Para Bellum; May 1, 2018 at 06:27 AM. |
May 1, 2018, 09:20 AM | #2 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
Odds are, the .223. Same velocity of the gas, but lesser quantity.
|
May 1, 2018, 01:18 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
|
Thanks, Art.
I thought so, too. From once source I've learned that the average gas pressure of the 223 at the muzzle of a 60cm (23,6”) barrel is 419 bar, while it is 450 with the .308. Hence a little more pressure and – maybe –, I don’t know that, a more gas volume at the muzzle of the .308.
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum If you want peace - prepare for war |
May 1, 2018, 02:19 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
Whatever caliber you choose, it should be adequate for the game hunted. Chamois? 223 is probably just fine. Pigs or deer? Although the 223 may be capable with good shot placement, I would opt for the 308. Suppression effect will be the same. You are looking at 29 db reduction with that suppressor, but it cannot be disassembled for cleaning (according to the web page you linked to), and suppression effectiveness will depend on how clean you keep the suppressor.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
May 2, 2018, 09:11 PM | #5 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
"I also want a light but effective suppressor. "
Unless you have deep pockets these terms don't fit together especially in reference to.308. Much easier to suppress a smaller round like the .223. |
May 3, 2018, 07:16 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2008
Posts: 512
|
Using a 30 caliber suppressor on a 223 works excellent. That's all I use, besides my Rimfire suppressor on my 22 lr guns.
You can have the barrel's threaded to fit a 30 cal suppressor, or use a thread adapter. |
May 3, 2018, 12:12 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2013
Location: Western slope of Colorado
Posts: 3,679
|
A 308 can on a 223 rifle works pretty good. Its not AS effective as a true 223 can. The trade-off is weight vs versatility. 308 cans are just bigger and heavier then 223 cans. The additional volume of the 308can lets it suppress a 223 round despite the larger exit hole.
Of course it would allow you to crossdeck it onto additional rifles. I dont currently have a 223 dedicated can. I run my 7.62sdn6 on all my 223 rifles and it works fine, just not a lightweight setup |
May 3, 2018, 07:52 PM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
"A 308 can on a 223 rifle works pretty good. Its not AS effective as a true 223 can."
Definitely true statement. I used a .30 can for everything for a while but adding a dedicated .223 can made a noticeable difference. 6.8 in a .30 can works well enough. |
May 12, 2018, 03:47 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
|
Quote:
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum If you want peace - prepare for war |
|
May 13, 2018, 07:08 AM | #10 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
"I do. Fortunately."
In that case, I can't help much. Everything I use is based on budget constraints. Just keep "buying and trying" as long as those deep pockets hold out. Sooner or later, maybe you'll find what you're looking for. |
May 13, 2018, 08:06 PM | #11 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 27, 2015
Posts: 1,768
|
WOW!
ZERO mention of subsonic or standard velocity ammo from anyone... |
May 13, 2018, 09:11 PM | #12 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
"ZERO mention of subsonic or standard velocity ammo from anyone..."
I don't consider sub-sonic ammo in a normal sized cartridge an alternative. |
May 13, 2018, 11:22 PM | #13 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 27, 2015
Posts: 1,768
|
Wasn't your thread...
|
May 14, 2018, 09:58 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Quote:
A proper suppressor will reduce the dB level enough, even with standard velocity/pressure ammunition, to be hearing safe for a shot or two.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
|
|