The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 19, 2018, 01:53 AM   #1
Departed402
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 25, 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 884
649-1 +P rated?

Pretty straight forward, but I can't find an answer online. Would a 649-1 be +P rated? I know the simple answer is, "Look on the barrel," but I've heard some Smith & Wesson revolvers were +P rated before they began marking the barrels as such.
__________________
Slow is Smooth. Smooth is Fast.
Departed402 is offline  
Old July 19, 2018, 06:21 AM   #2
105kw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 30, 2017
Location: Columbia Basin Washington
Posts: 413
As I understand it, Smith rated steel frame guns as usable with plus P , long before they marked their guns ".38 Special +P".

I would be comfortable with a K frame, but I have shoot a lot of +P through various J frames. I've never shot one loose, but I really limited round count.

There are a lot of regular pressure loads now for defense, so there are many more options then in the past.
105kw is offline  
Old July 19, 2018, 02:13 PM   #3
ThomasT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,753
This is the best answer to the +P question.

http://shootingwithhobie.blogspot.co...-saxonpig.html
ThomasT is offline  
Old July 20, 2018, 07:46 AM   #4
David R
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2015
Location: The swamps of WNY
Posts: 753
If it has a dash in the model number, +P.

David

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
David R is offline  
Old July 20, 2018, 09:38 AM   #5
laytonj1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2005
Posts: 4,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by David R View Post
If it has a dash in the model number, +P.
Uh, no. The 38 special version was at -4 when the factory rated it for +P.
That said, any 38 special steel framed J frame can fire +P with the understanding that it might/will accelerate wear.

Jim
laytonj1 is offline  
Old July 20, 2018, 07:22 PM   #6
ThomasT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,753
If you read the link I posted above you will see that sometimes +P ammo reaches the power level of the original 38 Special load. But not always. +P is a gimmick to make up for how weak standard 38 Special is now loaded.

The original 38 Special was a real step up in power over the 38 Long Colt that gained so many complaints in the Philippine-American war. So the 38 Special was developed to replace a round that shot a 150gr lead bullet at 750fps from a 6" barrel to a round that shot a 158gr bullet 850-900fps.

The article mentioned the Sellier & Bellot 158gr round nose lead loads at around 950fps. And they will get it too and they are NOT rated as +P loads. I still have a couple of boxes left and its a powerful round compared to most "38 Special" factory loads I have shot.

So if your gun will handle REAL 38 Special loads it will handle the legendary +P ammo sold to consumers with no worries.
ThomasT is offline  
Old July 21, 2018, 11:48 PM   #7
Laz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 12, 1999
Posts: 1,278
Sellier and Bellot lists the 158 grain 38 Special LRN at 997 fps but that is from a 7.50 inch test barrel, not the 4 inch test barrel used to get the “normal” 755 fps. I’m not saying it’s not a warmish load but it helps to compare things on an equal footing. If one assumed 50 fps per inch of test barrel, a wimpy 755 fps standard pressure 158 LRN might possibly reach as much as 930 fps from the same 7.50 inch barrel.
__________________
Laz

I’m just a nobody, trying to tell everybody, about Somebody, who can save anybody.
Laz is offline  
Old July 22, 2018, 03:05 PM   #8
ThomasT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,753
People like to refer to ballisticsbytheinch and so I looked them up. Unfortunately they only use lightweight bullets in their test but they never show anything like a 50fps loss per in of barrel. Or like the poster here named Kraigwy has stated several times the difference between the 6" and 4" barrels he has seen is about 50fps.

http://www.ballisticsbytheinch.com/38special.html

So I am curious. Did you actually read the link I posted above? If not I suggest you look it over.

Last edited by ThomasT; July 22, 2018 at 03:12 PM.
ThomasT is offline  
Old July 22, 2018, 10:47 PM   #9
DPris
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
You can fire +P through it.
Denis
DPris is offline  
Old July 23, 2018, 07:38 AM   #10
rodfac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,623
Call S&W, get the word from the horse's mouth!! Rod
__________________
Cherish our flag, honor it, defend it in word and deed, or get the hell out. Our Bill of Rights has been paid for by heros in uniform and shall not be diluted by misguided governmental social experiments. We owe this to our children, anything less is cowardice. USAF FAC, 5th Spl Forces, Vietnam Vet '69-'73.
rodfac is offline  
Old July 23, 2018, 11:45 AM   #11
DPris
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
If you do, understand that you may run the risk of the phone people giving you some nonsense about barrel stamping, and if they do, that's exactly what it'll be.
Denis
DPris is offline  
Old July 23, 2018, 09:04 PM   #12
1MoreFord
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 30, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 244
I've got an ole buddy who has shot a bunch of +P out of an air weight J-Frame and it's still holding together. An all steel J-Frame is definitely capable of shooting +P.
1MoreFord is offline  
Old July 26, 2018, 04:26 PM   #13
SaxonPig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2006
Posts: 1,900
Mainstream +P is not loaded to excessive pressures and any modern (say after 1930) revolver in good condition should have no trouble with it. The +P is not even loaded to full potential. Standard pressure is now 16,500. Used to be 18,500 which is what +P generates. Old loads went as high as 21,500.

Below is my 1942 M&P. I fired 500 rounds of Remington +P (125 JHP at 925 FPS) and 600 rounds of my own +P+ (125 JHP at 1,150 FPS) to see if anything would happen. Nothing did.

SaxonPig is offline  
Old July 27, 2018, 10:07 PM   #14
Laz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 12, 1999
Posts: 1,278
Quote:
Standard pressure is now 16,500. Used to be 18,500 which is what +P generates. Old loads went as high as 21,500.
I readily defer to your superior experience and knowledge but I sometimes don’t understand some numbers you cite, usually without reference, and, if memory serves, they have varied over the years in your posts. Since I have become interested in handguns over the past 25 plus years, the number I consistently found in any research has been 17,000 psi for .38 Special standard pressure and, for a long time, 18,500 psi for plus P. In recent years, the SAAMI standard for plus P has apparently been raised to 20,000 psi. When the 135 grain Speer short barrel load was introduced the spec paper on it claimed a Maximum Average Pressure of 21,500 psi. When I questioned Speer on that I was told that referred to. “Maximum Probable Lot Mean”, I think they called it and told me it was loaded to 20,000 psi. There remains a lot about handguns I don’t know but almost every time I read in forums about modern “wimpy” plus P loads the references usually lead back to your posts in the subject. It’s wonderful to be respected and quoted but I have a hard time confirming your claims independently. No offense intended. I’m just trying to continue to learn.
__________________
Laz

I’m just a nobody, trying to tell everybody, about Somebody, who can save anybody.
Laz is offline  
Old July 28, 2018, 01:06 AM   #15
DPris
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133

Denis
DPris is offline  
Old July 28, 2018, 06:13 AM   #16
amd6547
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2,313
I don’t shoot +P in my Model 38 (no dash), due to that model’s propensity to crack the frame at the bottom of the forcing cone.
Other than that, I’ve never encountered a factory +P load that I would be afraid to shoot in any steel frame S&W 38spl.
__________________
The past is gone...the future may never happen.
Be Here Now.
amd6547 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09518 seconds with 10 queries