May 13, 2005, 12:47 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Indian Territory
Posts: 192
|
120,000 rounds per minute
Imagin this, no heat, no recoil, no sound, no gunpowder, no flash -- just 120,000 rounds
per minute of pulverizing power. The next generation of weapons systems has arrived: the DREAD centrifuge-powered weapon system. Imagine a gun with no recoil, no sound, no heat, no gunpowder, no visible firing signature (muzzle flash), and no stoppages or jams of any kind. Now imagine that this gun could fire .308 caliber and .50 caliber metal projectiles accurately at up to 8,000 fps (feet-per-second), featured an infinitely variable/programmable cyclic rate-of-fire (as high as 120,000 rounds-per-minute), and were capable of laying down a 360-degree field of fire. http://www.military.com/soldiertech/...soldiertech.nl
__________________
"Fast is Fine but accuracy is final.".....Wyatt Earp. |
May 13, 2005, 01:15 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 858
|
That looks amazing!
The article does leave me asking questions, though. If this thing could fire projectiles at up to 8,000 fps, how fast would that centrifuge have to spin? How could something that spins that ridiculously fast, not build up any heat? Amazing, but I'm a bit skeptical without more info.
__________________
I don't believe in a government that protects us from ourselves. Ronald Reagan |
May 13, 2005, 01:17 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Indian Territory
Posts: 192
|
I think it is more Sci-Fi than anything. If it materialized I'd sure like to shoot the sucker.
__________________
"Fast is Fine but accuracy is final.".....Wyatt Earp. |
May 13, 2005, 01:47 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,535
|
Anytime anybody says "no recoil" about any projectile weapon but a rocket, I get VERY suspicious about the rest of his claims. A two-foot diameter rotor (About the maximum you could get in that 32 inch housing with the wall thickness needed to direct the shot and protect the gunner against a fragmented rotor.) launching a shot at 8000 fps would have to be turning 76,000 rpm minimum.
|
May 13, 2005, 01:56 PM | #5 |
Junior member
Join Date: August 31, 2001
Posts: 8,785
|
I'm curious how you'd be able to manuever something with that much gyroscopic force.
|
May 13, 2005, 01:56 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 25, 2004
Posts: 438
|
What about being able to shoot 360 deg.? Whats the point? I sure wouldnt want my gun killing me. Btw, that thing reminds me of that gun I used to have that shot foam disks when I was a kid. Why does it state a caliber anyways if it can shoot in any direction I don't see how it could have a barrel as we know it. I figger it operates like a cotton candy maker. Even if it does employ a barrel, how could anyone actually carry all that lead (in .308) to keep it fed for even one minute? How would they be fed into the gun? That thing looks more like a model of the USS RELIANT from 'the wrath of khan' movie.
|
May 13, 2005, 02:57 PM | #7 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Location: mid-atlantic
Posts: 352
|
Even if they made that thing battlefield ready,
I don't know how the range and acurracy would be on that thing , and thats the main problem i have with this weapons system. Quote:
Quote:
I'm rather skeptical. And the fact that it's called DREAD doesn't help.
__________________
Cheers, Dave |
||
May 13, 2005, 03:50 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 9, 2005
Posts: 388
|
I do kind of buy the recoilless part; it would vibrate more than kick as it launched things. (Think of it like a sling, not a gun. Forces are applied in acceleration, but not release.)
And yeah, it seems like it would be extremely vulnerable to damage and dirt. |
May 13, 2005, 04:14 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2004
Location: KTN
Posts: 1,221
|
Ya'll are a bunch of damn pessimists.......I would like to get my hands on one just for the hell of it!
__________________
HDR Ban!? It's a shame all of my guns sank with my boat last week... Time to catch up.....like mayonnaise |
May 13, 2005, 07:10 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 22, 2004
Location: The Free State
Posts: 498
|
JHC.
Does anyone realize what rounds 1/32 of an inch apart are? A SOLID STREAM OF DEATH. 8,000 fps? I think I have to go sit down somewhere.
__________________
June 23, 2003 GRATZ et al. v. BOLLINGER et al. The day America died. Never Forget 9/11. Cold dead hands... |
May 13, 2005, 08:12 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Indian Territory
Posts: 192
|
Too much thinking
Jim, You thinking way too much brother. I kinda figured it was so insignificant, it's more of a novalty concept.
__________________
"Fast is Fine but accuracy is final.".....Wyatt Earp. |
May 13, 2005, 08:15 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Okay, well most of the hype is false. It is not silent, jam-proof, and there will be considerable heat building up when you are slinging ball bearings out at that rate. Moreover, it is going to be on a large motorized platform. The centerfuge will be very loud. With projectiles per second breaking the sound barrier, you can darned will believe it is going to make a lot of noise.
It can't jam? So it is going to work every time, perfectly, such as all the feeding mechanisms always work, the centerfuge always works, etc.? The M16 was self cleaning, as I recall. Uh-huh, sure. And Glenda the good witch married Santa Claus.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
May 13, 2005, 08:15 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: April 1, 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 46
|
Need a $200 stamp for that? it isn't a firearm, it just flings mini golf balls.
__________________
Saiga 7.62 Norinco M98 Taurus PT-111, Millennium Pro |
May 13, 2005, 10:13 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,545
|
This magical new weapon "can't jam" and "is frictionless"??? Kinda reminds me of the story about the guy who got on a fully automated airplane and heard "There is no pilot on this airplane. The computer controls everything. But don't worry because nothing can go wrong, can go wrong, can go wrong, can go wrong, ..."
Good shooting and be safe. LB |
May 13, 2005, 11:18 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
|
Having seen lab grade centrifuge in use, I have to call BS. The torque on that gun would be extreme. The power requirements would be impossible. and the slightest speck on any part of the rotor would cause it to vibrate to destruction. I remember asking if the frame of the centrifuge fould stop anything if the rotor failed. She laughed and said that it is near impossible to stop anything moving that fast. That's why tolerances are so high and inspections are performed on the equipment daily.
|
May 14, 2005, 10:10 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 7, 2001
Location: The Gas Tax State
Posts: 949
|
Crosshair nailed it.
I too have used ultra centrifuges that ran to 75k and above. (1) They use some fairly exotic systems to achieve that speed, Diffusion pumps/turbine drives etc (2) Rotors were titanium and had to be derated over time due to the stresses placed on them or they would shatter. (3) The inside to the chamber is surrounded by armor plating and the unit weighs hundreds of pounds. The armor belt is there for a reason Before samples tubes can be placed in the rotor they must be carefully weighed on a lab balance and a darn good one to assure samples across from each other weigh the same. If not, it super stresses the head which could fail, so kiss of 300K. And these folks would have us believe they have designed a system which by its very nature is constanly un-balancing the rotor (ball carrier) as it slings of balls. Even if it ejected balls from opposing sides in a constant attempt to re-balance, the stresses on something typing to be a gyroscope at 75K rpm would be amazing. I could be wrong but I don't thinks so. Didn't the Australians invent a weapon with multiple barrels each holding a stack of rounds that fired successively to achive high rounds per minute? I know someone did but I have heard no news it was very embraced or deployed. S-
__________________
Selfdfenz |
May 14, 2005, 11:41 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: January 21, 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 98
|
how does it work? I mean 360 deg.? what size could it have?
__________________
Everyone has to earn his title. Max |
May 14, 2005, 11:58 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2005
Location: Washougal, Washington. YEHAW!
Posts: 1,872
|
Sounds like what people have been workin on for years; rail guns, gauss guns, etc.
__________________
Romans 12:21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good More CZ M52 info than you can shake a stick at! |
May 14, 2005, 12:56 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 9, 2005
Posts: 388
|
Well, not really.
The DREAD operates like a big-ass sling; ever tie a string to a rock, whip it around really fast, and then let go? DREAD's like that. |
May 14, 2005, 12:59 PM | #20 | |
Junior member
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 940
|
Quote:
|
|
May 14, 2005, 01:02 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 9, 2005
Posts: 388
|
Well, not really.
The DREAD operates like a big-ass sling; ever tie a string to a rock, whip it around really fast, and then let go? DREAD's like that. |
May 14, 2005, 01:05 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Central Missouri
Posts: 533
|
Unless Newton's third law has been repealed, there has to be recoil.
Spherical ballistics being what they are, how far could that 3000 f.p.s. ball really go before it slows to a trot? |
May 14, 2005, 02:03 PM | #23 | |
Junior member
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 940
|
Quote:
|
|
May 14, 2005, 04:32 PM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: April 1, 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 46
|
Here we go.. put blades on the centrifuge and launch it like a frisbee.
__________________
Saiga 7.62 Norinco M98 Taurus PT-111, Millennium Pro |
May 14, 2005, 05:20 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 13, 2005
Posts: 175
|
The Roswell Throwswell - the next (figuratively speaking) Bradley Fighting Vehicle.
__________________
BigBoreKindaGuy |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|