|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 25, 2017, 10:02 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
|
Constitutional Carry vs. Gun Free School Zones
First of all, congratulations to North Dakota on passing a Constitutional Carry law. But...
Something that has concerned me for a while is the potentially dangerous combination of the laws in the thread title. It is very difficult where I live to go anywhere without traversing several school zones. Doing so with a loaded gun on your person or in your vehicle is a federal felony. In fact, coming within 1000 feet of school property is a felony. One of the few exceptions is given to those who have a state CCW permit but those who practice "permit-less carry" have no such immunity. Taken at face value, we are to either reach our destination and IF we are outside the 1000 ft buffer zone, then unlock our gun and load it, OR go through this same procedure every time we pass through a GFSZ. In the real world, most will ignore the GFSZ prohibition while driving or they will for the most part give up on Constitutional Carry. I have talked with some of the local CC movers about this concern and received a non-answer. I have talked to LEOs who have poo pooed the possibility that a general lawful person would have their life ruined by a simple traffic stop due to this conflict. The officers I talked to are good guys and undoubtedly would not set out to burn average people. But not all officers think as they do. I'd like to know if other states have addressed the situation if it is even possible. The real solution is probably at the federal level. Perhaps when Constitutional Carry states reach a certain percentage (currently at 25% of states) the GFSZA can be amended to consider the fact. Your thoughts? |
March 25, 2017, 12:41 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: MS - USA
Posts: 899
|
I may not have a satisfactory answer but...
If you are worried about it and an exception is allowed for permit holders, then get a permit. That's why I will maintain my permit, even though my state now has permitless (Constitutional) carry. My state (and many others) also recognizes my car as an extension of my home, which is another reason I don't worry. |
March 25, 2017, 02:14 PM | #3 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Your concern is valid, and the problem is real. The same concern extends to the possibility of a national reciprocity law at the federal level -- the GFSZ law only grants exception to those with a carry permit from the jurisdiction in which the school zone is located.
The only solution, which is unlikely to happen, would be to repeal or significantly revise the GFSZ law. |
March 25, 2017, 05:24 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
|
Thank you both for your thoughts. I may go ahead and get a CCW permit to cover this legal glitch. I doubt that the general public will do so though and it will be interesting to see the outcome when overzealous officers nail soccer mom(s) or dad(s) to the wall. That might be the catalyst needed to change the GFSZ law.
Here is perhaps a reason to be hopeful though. Just how likely is it that state and local officers would enforce a strictly federal law anyway? I really don't know. |
March 25, 2017, 05:44 PM | #5 | ||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
||
March 25, 2017, 06:42 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,446
|
Quote:
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
|
March 25, 2017, 07:23 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: MS - USA
Posts: 899
|
Frank,
I mentioned my car as being recognized by my state as an extension of my home as ANOTHER reason...not the sole reason...that I don't worry about driving through school zones in my state. The primary reason, again, being that I possess and maintain an "enhanced" firearm (carry) permit in my state. |
March 25, 2017, 07:49 PM | #8 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by random guy; March 25, 2017 at 07:55 PM. |
||
March 25, 2017, 08:45 PM | #9 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
You have just acknowledged that you apparently break the GFSZ law multiple times each year. How does that in any way make the OP's concern invalid, or the problem not real? It seems that you are comfortable taking the risk of being caught and charged with violating the law. Some folks are perhaps more risk averse than you. |
||
March 26, 2017, 07:57 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
How about simply removing the firearm from your person while in the car?
And don't ever give permission to have the car searched during a stop. Wouldn't that change the situation in your favor, since the gun is no longer actually on your person? Just a thought.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
March 26, 2017, 08:08 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: MS - USA
Posts: 899
|
I think, to be in compliance with the federal law (absent an exception such as being a permit holder in that state), that the firearm has to be unloaded and locked in a container (Re: lockbox). Not sure if just unloading and stowing in the trunk is technically adequate. But it definitely is supposed to be unloaded.
|
March 26, 2017, 08:42 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
|
Pretty sure that jmhyer is correct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-Fr...990#Provisions Quote:
Maintaining a current CCW permit is about the only practical protection but then that basically eliminates the purpose of Constitutional Carry. In practical terms, the two laws (as is) are incompatible for all but those who live in very sparsely populated areas. Even they could run afoul but the problem would be lessened. Here is an interesting video of the law being abused. Skip to about 10:20 where the officers begin brainstorming to locate a GFSZ close enough to take an open carry activist into custody. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bm4mUkgPeeE I have mixed feelings about such activism but the young man is by all indications calm, sane and up to nothing more, not to mention possessing a CCW permit which takes the issue off the table. How would this officer treat someone who does not have a permit? |
|
March 26, 2017, 11:00 AM | #13 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
March 26, 2017, 12:40 PM | #14 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
March 26, 2017, 02:29 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: MS - USA
Posts: 899
|
Yes, I am sure about that in my state. Now, whether or not that law alone, would provide sufficient protection from federal prosecution, I can't say for sure. I would think it would be analogous to living a block away from a school, in which case I could have a gun in my home (though possessing it out in the yard might present a problem). In either situation, I'd hate to be the test case.
|
March 26, 2017, 02:54 PM | #16 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
That is an example of the most common sort of error folks make when thinking about or discussing the law. These sorts of "common sense" analogies are very often wrong. People think a lot of thing are true that aren't true -- especially, it seems, with regard to legal matters. And unless you reached your conclusion based on a sound understanding of the law and some solid research, there's an excellent chance that what you think is true isn't true -- unless you managed to make a lucky guess. Most people really don't understand the law because they have not studied it. And to understand the law, one needs to actually study it. Much in the law is non-intuitive or will make sense only when one has sufficient background knowledge. You can't expect to be able to figure out what the law is or how it works just by trying to "reason it out."
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
March 26, 2017, 04:47 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: MS - USA
Posts: 899
|
Thanks, Frank, for clearing up the fact that I never claimed that I was using anything other than common sense/logic/reasoning to explain my supposition and that, in fact, my statement that I'd hate to be the test case was an admission of exactly that.
|
March 26, 2017, 05:47 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Posts: 1,196
|
"In fact, coming within 1000 feet of school property is a felony."
So even traveling on a public highway??? If that's the law it's absurd, preposterous, and unenforceable. |
March 26, 2017, 06:25 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,446
|
Quote:
Maybe you live where the cops have these serious tools that can see guns and bullets through steel trunks, gun cases, etc. - not so where I live. I am not saying to be a test case, but reality about making a turn on a small town highway suddenly makes me illegal because of where I turned?,,,,,,,,,Not sweating that one - you go ahead.
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
|
March 26, 2017, 07:00 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
|
Quote:
|
|
March 26, 2017, 08:23 PM | #21 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
What about the people who LIVE within 1000ft of school property?
I don't hear about anybody busting them...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
March 26, 2017, 08:42 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
|
You're OK "(i) on private property not part of school grounds;"
Which rules out private school property with few exceptions. |
March 26, 2017, 09:37 PM | #23 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
March 26, 2017, 11:12 PM | #24 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
If you don't have sound grounds for an opinion on a legal point, and you realize that you don't, why even bring it up? What could possibly be the value in a specious notion on a legal question?
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
March 27, 2017, 12:33 AM | #25 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
The simplest fix would be to tweak the law so that any permit satisfies the exemption, not only a permit from the state in which the school is located. But that doesn't do anything for "Constitutional carry." |
|
|
|