|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 13, 2013, 05:49 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
So, are HP-38 and W231 really the same?
I'm almost out of W231, and I just got about 4-1/2 pounds of HP-38. I'll be using it for .380 ACP, 9mm, .38 Special, .40 S&W and .45 ACP. Whatever recipes I use, I'll be working them up fresh from starting loads, if for no other reason than the fact that it's a new batch of powder. I have two questions, though:
1) As I look through my load manuals, can I use recipes that call for either W231 or HP-38? 2) Would it be okay to dump my last four ounces or so of W231 into the HP-38 jug and mix it up well before I start working up the new loads? Or should I use up the last of the W231 separately? |
February 13, 2013, 06:16 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 360
|
If it helps I went from one to the other with out a hick-up
__________________
life is great but its better when you can own as many guns you wish to own.for me I haven't bought enough yet. |
February 13, 2013, 06:16 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
The load data from Hodgdon shows both powders with identical info.
So, they must be the same or close enough to be thought of as the same. But mixing them is supposed to be a NO NO. They might not be exactly identical. Don't even mix different batches of the same powder. There might be some variance, batch to batch. That's why we're supposed to work up loads with any change of components. Especially if the loads are anywhere near max. Can't ever be too careful when messing with gunpowder.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
February 13, 2013, 06:17 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Central Louisiana
Posts: 3,137
|
From my understanding it is a consensus that HP38 and W231 are the same powder, simply repackaged. Likewise, H110 and 296. I don't know if Hodgdon will admit it, but that's what I understand.
|
February 13, 2013, 06:19 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,543
|
They are NOW the same stuff.
Since Hodgdon got the distributorship for Winchester branded powders, it has been convenient for them to just slap on whichever label, HP38 or Win 231, that they have orders for. Ball powders are pretty consistent, I routinely back mix the last of an old lot with the new and have not seen a change in velocity. |
February 13, 2013, 06:23 PM | #6 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: September 21, 2010
Location: az
Posts: 1,332
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"When there’s lead in the air, there’s hope in the heart”- Hunter’s Proverb "Feed me, or feed me to something. I just want to be part of the food chain." -Al Bundy |
||
February 13, 2013, 06:24 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
|
It is instructive to see in older reloading manuals the differences in maximum charge weights between HP38/W231 and H110/W296.
What that shows you is the lot to lot difference of identical powders.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading. |
February 13, 2013, 06:26 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
Thanks for the replies, guys. But I have to say, I've never understood this part, even though I've heard it before:
Quote:
As an example, I have two 8-lb jugs of WC860. Rather than starting with one jug, working up an optimum load, and then having to do it all over again when I finish the first jug and open the second, why couldn't I just mix it all together from the start, work up a load, and then use that same load for the entire sixteen pounds? EDIT - I just saw that several of you addressed my question before I was even done typing it. Thanks again! |
|
February 13, 2013, 07:16 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,543
|
Quote:
Now, it is all handled out of the same warehouse, there is only one set of lot variation even though packed under two labels. Look at the Hodgdon www or book. The load data is identical, down to the last tenth of a grain and CUP. That tells me they only ran one set of tests and just wrote it down twice. Same stuff. Hodgdon says so. |
|
February 14, 2013, 06:05 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
We really don't have any way to measure pressure.
While velocity and pressure are related, they aren't always directly relative to one another. There's variables that can cause increases in pressure without an increase in velocity. Maybe high pressures can be noticed, but maybe not. Besides just getting an unexpected surprise, getting into the habit of mixing powders could result in mixing two different powders by mistake one day. Oops. My own experiences show that different batches of the same powder, bought at different times can, indeed, have different results. No hugely, maybe, but definitely measurable.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” Last edited by g.willikers; February 14, 2013 at 06:15 PM. |
February 14, 2013, 06:28 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
When two batches of powder are mixed, how can you be sure that the mix is truly homogeneous.
What if the two batches are different and they don't mix entirely well? What assurance is there that each and every cartridge will get exactly the same mix? Just thinking out loud, here.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
February 14, 2013, 06:32 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
g.willikers, we do have a way to measure pressure. Buy the same systems SAAMI and some ammo companies use to test ammo. It'll cost a bundle of sawbucks, but it is doable. SAAMI would probably tell you whom to buy them from.
Here's a less expensive system, but it works best using the test methodology listed in SAAMI documents as far as test barrels and ammo handling procedures are concerned. http://www.shootingsoftware.com/pressure.htm |
February 14, 2013, 06:36 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
That's amazing.
It's not cheap, at up to $800, but definitely in the realm of possibility. Thanks for the link.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
February 14, 2013, 08:07 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 1,427
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|