|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 28, 2018, 08:37 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2006
Posts: 312
|
Best Ammo for Cow Elk in 308?
I will be using a Howa chambered in 308 for my cow elk hunt. That is if I even go. Jury's still out due to other obligations.
My main contenders at this point are, Remington Core Lokt. Barnes TSX. Nosler Trophy with Accubond bullets. I consider myself a fair shot, but probably wont take a shot at much over 200 yards. Although the Barnes and Nosler are a bit more exotic, I have read many good reports on the Remington Core Lokt ammunition, including good accuracy. Thoughts, comments, and suggestions are welcome. |
August 28, 2018, 09:02 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 646
|
My bro uses factory 180 grn. Rem. C.L.s in his M88 Winchester in .308 cal. for elk, and he does very well with it. Last year he got a nice 6X6 bull, and since he and his wife have moved to Wyoming and established resident status, he's gotten his elk just about every year for the past 10 years using that rifle and ammo. I don't believe he's shot an elk with that M88 at over 200 yards, either; nice, accurate old rifle with an old Weaver variable on it. If you're just after a cow, I wouldn't hesitate using a well constructed 165 grain bullet in your rifle at the range you suggest (IMO).
|
August 28, 2018, 10:03 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 10, 1999
Location: High Desert NV
Posts: 2,850
|
If you hit her in the boiler room, she won't know the difference between any of them. If you don;t, the bullet choice won't help.
|
August 28, 2018, 10:09 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2011
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 789
|
Try and stick with a 180 if possible. Cow elk are still BIG. Good luck.
|
August 28, 2018, 10:28 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2018
Posts: 619
|
Nosler Trophy Accubond. 180g would be good but a 165 will give good results with a big cow. The Accubond bullets tend to expand better than the Partitions at longer distances. Regardless, keep it to 200 yards and under or go with a 270 or 30-06. I use my 06 for Elk up to about 250 yards but if I've been following one for a couple of days and cant get close, I use my 270 WSM or 300 WSM depending on which one I brought.
|
August 28, 2018, 01:02 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,248
|
You don't need a 180 grain bullet, you need a bullet that shoots well. I'd not hesitate to use any 150-165 grain bullets that shoot accurately in your rifle on a cow elk. Barnes makes Vortex ammo with the 130 grain TTSX and I'd use that if it is accurate in your rifle. It won't beat you to death practicing at the range getting ready for your hunt.
__________________
NRA Life Member |
August 28, 2018, 01:31 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
If you're not reloading you must try a box of as many brands and bullet weights as you can to find the ammo your Howa shoots best. This'll be an expensive proposition so start with any 165 grain hunting bullet. A basic SP will do nicely. A 165 out of a .308 will kill any game in North America you care to hunt. And the .308 loves 'em.
Remington Core-Lokt ammo is one of the brands all others are compared to. Be a good place to start. Sight in 3.5" high at 100 and you'll be on target out to 250 yards and about 5" low at 300. The kill zone on a cow elk is big enough for that drop and no hold over. Ya gotta know the anatomy though. https://www.elk101.com/features/shot-placement-feature/ Practice, off hand, at 100 yards, on a 9" pie plate, with your hunting ammo, until you can hit it every time.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
August 28, 2018, 03:17 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,286
|
I don't know how you hunt or the type of shots you take.
I'm not saying a 243 is a "better" elk cartridge,but some folks I know have been quite successful on elk with a 243. They use a proper bullet and choose their shots. Those two factors make many cartridges work. I think most any 165 to 180 gr factory load will work .Myself,of the choices you offer I'd go with the 165 gr Accubond Noslers. Does that mean they are best? Not really. It is an opinion . I've found that between a Ballistic Tip and the tougher Accubond I have been pleased with Nosler performance for both accuracy and game results. I have confidence in them. The 308 is a very good choice. Last edited by HiBC; August 28, 2018 at 03:28 PM. |
August 28, 2018, 03:29 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 23, 2013
Location: Central Taxylvania..
Posts: 3,609
|
With the 308, i'd use 165gr AccuBonds, as long as they grouped well.
Some rifles can be, eeerrrr, finicky with them. With that loading, shots to 400 yards no problem. Check out Randy Newberg on Youtube.
__________________
When our own government declares itself as "tyrannical", where does that leave us??!! "Januarary 6th insurrection". Funny, I didn't see a single piece of rope... |
August 28, 2018, 04:48 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2018
Posts: 619
|
+ 1 Totally agree. Someone said to use soft points. That's fine if you're not a good shot and dont mind wasting a lot of meat. Having seen the results, I would not recommend them.
|
August 28, 2018, 07:04 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2010
Posts: 274
|
Federal Premium: (MidwayUSA has a good sale price on these right now)
- 180 gr. Nosler Partition - 165 gr. Trophy Copper Remington HTP: - 168 gr, Barnes TSX Red |
August 28, 2018, 07:26 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,248
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member |
|
August 28, 2018, 08:42 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,808
|
The premium bullets can be an advantage when using cartridges borderline too small for the game hunted, at extended ranges or if taking shots from bad angles. And not all premium bullets are the same. Some are designed for better performance at longer ranges, others for better penetration at closer ranges from bad angles. either type work, just don't ask a bullet to do something it wasn't designed to do.
I think that if you avoid shots from bad angles, and keep shots under 300 yards the bullet choice isn't that important from a 308. But at the same time there isn't much downside to using premium bullets either. Yea, they do cost more, but the money saved buying 200 old school bullets vs 200 premium bullets will buy about 20 gallons of gas for my truck. Enough to drive about 350-400 miles. It is a 3500-4000 mile round trip and a $700 tag for me to hunt elk. Spending 30 cents more for a bullet that might allow me to take a shot from an angle that I'd have to pass up with the cheaper bullet seems like a bargain to me.
__________________
"If you're still doing things the same way you were doing them 10 years ago, you're doing it wrong" Winston Churchill |
August 28, 2018, 09:06 PM | #14 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
Funny you should ask. I'm getting prepared for my cow elk hunt this fall.
Last year(our first with this guide)my friend and I took what we know would work under any circumstance(7mm Rem mag). Turned out we were considerably over-gunned. Sure the 7mags worked but considering the animals' size and the ranges , we could have gone way lighter. This year I'm taking a 25/06 loaded with 115 Partitions and the other hunter is toting a .308. We haven't shot his new rifle yet so no solid choices on bullets but I'm suggesting he start with bonded controlled expansion 150-165 grain. This type of bullet will provide the depth of penetration needed for the 275-450# antlerless elk that we encountered last year and the lighter bullets will flatten trajectories making longer "hold on the brown" shots possible. |
August 28, 2018, 10:18 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2008
Location: Northeast Colorado
Posts: 1,993
|
Buy a box of 180 gr. Rounds. Federal makes good ammo, and their Vital-Shok Ammunition 308 Winchester 180 Grain Nosler Partition would work fine, if your rifle shoots them fairly well. You don't need to waste money and time trying every kind of ammo on the market. If the gun puts 3 of these into 1.5 inches at 100 yards, you're good to go. That bullet at elk hunting altitude should be more than enough to 300 yards for either a cow or bull elk.
|
August 29, 2018, 05:10 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: August 6, 2018
Location: Oregon
Posts: 24
|
If you want to get the most out of 308 winchester for Elk i would recomend checking out Hornadys superformance loads in 308 winchester. It is expencive but it is the most accurate factory loaded ammo i've ever shot and hottest ammo as well.
|
August 29, 2018, 05:45 AM | #17 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
'for Elk i would recomend checking out Hornadys superformance loads in 308 winchester."
The superformance ammo I've seen is loaded with SST bullets which I consider on the "soft" side for even smaller elk. |
August 29, 2018, 10:04 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
|
Quote:
Any weight of bullet from 150 up to 180 will do just fine. Oh BTW a high end bullet isn't required {Nosler_ Barns_or a Swift} to bring down anything. A plain Jane jacketed expanding/lead tip is all that's required for most lower 48 North American hunts. Commercial or Hand made ammo? Either cartridge will get the job done so long as its accurate out of {your} 308. Of course~ Good luck Ballenxj |
|
August 29, 2018, 11:20 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,965
|
Quote:
Superformance is also made with the Interbond which would be a much better choice. |
|
August 29, 2018, 03:24 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,802
|
The OP said, "My main contenders at this point are,
Remington Core Lokt. Barnes TSX. Nosler Trophy with Accubond bullets." My choices would be the Nosler load first with either the Accubond or Partition should the latter be available. The the Barnes TSX as a distant second and the Remington last if the OP is planning on using factory ammo. Final choice would be which load the rifle likes best, up to a point. No need for varmint gun accuracy here and 1.5" or less at 100 yards is more than good enough out to 300 yards or so. If the OP is a handloader, then I would look at the 165 gr. Accubond or Partiton first. That's based on only one cow elk that I shot two or three years ago. Rifle was a 30-06 and the load did 2880 FPS at the muzzle. The 165 gr. Accubond hit right at the short ribs and destroyed the left lung. The elk went maybe 30 feet and collapsed. Shot was about 100 or so yards. Bullet was not recovered. Most of my elk have been shot with a .35 Whelen and 225 gr. Barnes TSX. I haven't shot any in the .30 caliber range so no help there. It is my understanding the the .30 and under respond better if the velocity is on the high side. If looking at a cup and core bullet, I have had outstanding results on good sized Mule Deer with the 165 gr. Speer Hot Core when using a .308. Shots were from 35 feet to 250 yards. That bullet worked quite well, mostly pass throughs. Only recovered one and that was from the 250 yard shot and the bullet hit the deer as it faced me and stopped in the left ham. Paul B.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION! |
August 30, 2018, 07:24 AM | #21 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
The only AccuBond bullets I've used were 110 grain 257Wby and those tended to be "tough". Hits on deer at longer ranges ( 350+ yards) didn't show much expansion even at the velocities of the 257 Wby.
With this in mind, I wouldn't go over 165 in a .308. Partitions on the other hand have always shown satisfactory initial expansion. |
August 30, 2018, 08:19 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Quote:
|
|
September 5, 2018, 08:37 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 2006
Posts: 2,519
|
Called to the Sierra Ballistic Tech's when working in WA state.
Had my M70, with.308 hand-loads using the Sierra 165 gr SPBT, it was recommended to switch to the 165gr HPBT, and up the velocity to the most comfortable I could shoot at higher velocity. [ powder charge was 42.5 gr 748] The HPBT was indicated as being a sturdier construction, than the SPBT Good luck and have a GREAT hunt! [evenif you DON't get one! |
September 6, 2018, 02:44 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2018
Posts: 619
|
With a .308 and going after any Elk I would probably go with a Hornady 200gr ELDX and load it using their guide with their fastest tested powder/measure. My rifle likes the ELDX but yours might prefer something different. If you load lighter, say 150gr then a BTSP would be more appropriate and decrease the chances of a through and through without expansion. I use a 300 WSM for Elk but often have a .308 backup rifle.
|
September 6, 2018, 08:26 PM | #25 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
I guess a lot depends on the area and type of hunting planned.
When I hunted bull elk, I carried a caliber I knew was capable of making a fatal shot on a 700+# bull from most any angle at any range I might get an opportunity to shoot. The place where I hunted cow elk last year and where I'm headed again this year is a totally different game plan. Range and angle of shot is far more controlled so having that "bull hammer" cartridge is less important while placing a careful fatal lung shot is primary. There's no thick timber for a wounded elk to get lost in and it's even difficult to down an elk where a vehicle can't drive close. My hunting partner is using a .308 and we chose ammo suited to 200- 300 yard broadside shots at 300-400# animals. My 25/06 is on the light side so I'm padding my bet with Nosler Partitions or maybe Bear Claws. We're hunting for meat in addition to the fun so shooting an elk in the shoulder or butt isn't in our plan at all. Considering the hunting conditions and game population last year(and it was a tough year with very little snow up high) a low percentage shot can be passed for a better chance |
|
|