The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 27, 2017, 12:26 PM   #1
simonrichter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 2011
Location: Austria
Posts: 758
Why are there no poly-framed super-compact semiautos

it occured to me that, despite the vast variety of models on the firearms market, there are no polymer framed super-tiny mouseguns. The Taurus PT22 and the Kahr P380 are about as smallas it gets with a plastic frame. All of the super-concealables like the Seecamp, NAA or Bauer Baby Browning copies are massive metal frame guns.

Is there any technical reason for that or is it just the result of a dwindling interest in minor calibers mouseguns?
__________________
"Get off of my lawn!" Walt Kowalski
. ISSC PAR .223
simonrichter is offline  
Old June 27, 2017, 12:54 PM   #2
racedawg
Member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2016
Location: indiana
Posts: 94
Beleive Springfield makes a 9mm..seen one few yrs back.it was really small

Sent from my LGMS210 using Tapatalk
racedawg is offline  
Old June 27, 2017, 01:32 PM   #3
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
If you mean .22s and .25s specifically, it's probably a matter of there not being much demand.

There are some small, polymer-framed .380s.
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong.
RickB is offline  
Old June 27, 2017, 02:02 PM   #4
burrhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 1999
Location: Chihuahuan desert, Texas
Posts: 1,148
I've had a nice Colt 1908 Vest Pocket for 30+ years. I might carry it every few years at a function just for fun. Have my eye out for a Beretta Minx just to have one. I like the little bugs for what they are; fun big-boy toys but there's no real market. Seecamps are nice but no company that wants to stay in business would tool up to make a new design.
__________________
Join the GOA, SAF and the TSRA

I'm offended by people that are easily offended.
burrhead is offline  
Old June 27, 2017, 02:17 PM   #5
TailGator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,787
You're mostly talking about pistols with one-finger grips. The light weight of polymer would likely make it even tougher to keep a grip on the little buggers. Combine that with the .22 and .25 cartridges being so widely panned for defensive use, and it might be hard to generate a lot of interest.
TailGator is offline  
Old June 27, 2017, 03:23 PM   #6
simonrichter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 2011
Location: Austria
Posts: 758
@tailGator: I suppose that's the explanation.... It's still a little odd that there are soo many different models out there and not a single poly framed Baby Browning sitze. Now you mention it, the PT22 ply has Quite a beefy grip for more than two fingers
__________________
"Get off of my lawn!" Walt Kowalski
. ISSC PAR .223
simonrichter is offline  
Old June 27, 2017, 05:33 PM   #7
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,212
Personally I find a number of those pistols rather unpleasant to shoot and not very easy to shoot well. At the local gun stores near me the small pocket pistols often end up in the used gun section because people find out that in practice it's not as easy as they'd hoped.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is offline  
Old June 27, 2017, 06:15 PM   #8
PSP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 2, 2006
Location: Bowling Green Virginia
Posts: 4,487
Quote:
All of the super-concealables like the Seecamp, NAA or Bauer Baby Browning copies are massive metal frame guns.
Massive??? What? How small do you want?

Many .380 pocket guns are hugely popular, whether polymer or metal framed.
PSP is offline  
Old June 27, 2017, 06:46 PM   #9
JERRYS.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,968
the kel-tec p32
JERRYS. is offline  
Old June 29, 2017, 03:25 PM   #10
TailGator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,787
Quote:
Massive??? What? How small do you want?

Many .380 pocket guns are hugely popular, whether polymer or metal framed.
I took the comment to refer to the material mass, or weight (and yes, physics majors, I know the difference) of metal being higher. Most reports, and my own experience, relate that the metal .380s (Sig P238, NAA) transmit less felt recoil than the polymer pistols of similar size (like the LCP). Its the old trade-off of mass being good for shooting and bad for carrying, though. The LCP is extremely popular for being so easy to carry.
TailGator is offline  
Old June 29, 2017, 05:00 PM   #11
valleyforge.1777
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 2, 2011
Posts: 177
How much real difference is there between the weight of a polymer frame and an aluminum frame for a small handgun? Once you take the upper section off (slide, barrel, recoil rod, spring) the aluminum frames are REALLY light.
valleyforge.1777 is offline  
Old June 29, 2017, 05:05 PM   #12
tallball
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2014
Posts: 2,444
The Kel-Tec P32 and P3AT, and the pistols "inspired by them".
tallball is offline  
Old June 30, 2017, 09:53 AM   #13
Carl the Floor Walker
member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2017
Location: South
Posts: 1,422
First of all you are talking about Grips and not frames. The Pico for instance has a steel frame and a polymer grip. The Kahr has steel inserts and a polymer grip. Same with other guns. A polymer grip can crack under pressure or heavy use in some cases, like the Ruger LCP.
Carl the Floor Walker is offline  
Old June 30, 2017, 11:19 AM   #14
drunder40
Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2017
Location: The Free state of NH-Southeast
Posts: 20
Would the Colt Mustang XTP FE qualify as a super compact? it is tiny..
__________________
Retired Navy RM/ITC(SW) 1982-2002
USS Edward McDonnell (FF-1043), USS Pegasus (PHM1)
USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70)
Colt Mustang XSP FE, Sig P938/238 , Sig P320C RX
drunder40 is offline  
Old July 2, 2017, 03:43 AM   #15
simonrichter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 2011
Location: Austria
Posts: 758
No, I would only count anything nearly the sitze of a Baby Browning - the Mustang is 5,5" long!.
__________________
"Get off of my lawn!" Walt Kowalski
. ISSC PAR .223
simonrichter is offline  
Old July 2, 2017, 12:24 PM   #16
TRX
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 24, 2008
Location: central Arkansas
Posts: 400
I dunno, my Ruger LCP has a plastic frame, and it's pretty small.
TRX is offline  
Old July 2, 2017, 01:58 PM   #17
TailGator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,787
Quote:
How much real difference is there between the weight of a polymer frame and an aluminum frame for a small handgun? Once you take the upper section off (slide, barrel, recoil rod, spring) the aluminum frames are REALLY light.
I don't know about the frames only, but to take a couple of examples, Sig lists the weight of the P238 as 16 oz, and Ruger says the LCP (the old version) weighs less than 10 oz.
TailGator is offline  
Old July 4, 2017, 09:56 AM   #18
ammo.crafter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2006
Location: The Keystone State
Posts: 1,970
tinsey

I guess the PK380 would be too large to be considered.

I will day that my AMT Backup is a micro compact and is steel, yet the 380 recoil is sharp due to its size. A poly mini would exhibit vastly greater felt recoil. Perhaps this is why manufacturers have not gotten into them.
__________________
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading".
--Thomas Jefferson
ammo.crafter is offline  
Old July 4, 2017, 12:45 PM   #19
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,985
The larger the gun, the more advantage polymer holds.
There are few guns of ANY composition the size of the Baby Browning!
Bernardelli
Walther 9
Unique Mikros
Browning clones.
I doubt a polymer-framed Baby Browning would show any weight saving over the lightweight alloy version.
The Keltec P-32, while larger, weighs less than the lightweight Browning.
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old July 4, 2017, 06:42 PM   #20
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,986
The smaller/lighter the gun in a given caliber, the harder it is to make it reliable. Interesting quote by Les Baer in the January issue of American Handgunner.

In reference to pistols with barrels shorter than 4.25", Baer commented: "Its just too hard to get those small guns to run 100 percent. Some people can come close, but close isn't good enough for me."

I also recall reading an article in Shotgun News some years back by one of the authors (Frank James) who bought a Kahr PM40 (.40S&W version of the PM9) and had trouble getting it to shoot reliably. He had a steel-framed version of the gun and thought he was getting an even better carry gun by picking up the polymer frame version. Unfortunately, even after a trip to a custom gunsmith he finally had to live with the fact that if he didn't hold it very firmly it was going to jam on him. It was bad enough that he could only shoot about a box of ammo through it in a range session before his hands weakened from fatigue and he started getting jams.

At some point, a gun gets small enough that if you try to make it lighter by going to a polymer frame you're just not going to be able to make it work all the time.

My personal lower size weight limit for a polymer 9mm is the CW9/P9. In a heavier caliber I would go bigger/heavier. In a smaller caliber, a little smaller and lighter would be acceptable.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old July 5, 2017, 10:54 PM   #21
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,212
Quote:
In reference to pistols with barrels shorter than 4.25", Baer commented: "Its just too hard to get those small guns to run 100 percent. Some people can come close, but close isn't good enough for me."
While I can see that for the 1911, I've owned a number of subcompacts with barrels shorter than that and were reliable. M&P 9c, Glock 26, P2000sk, and probably some I'm forgetting.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is offline  
Old July 5, 2017, 11:09 PM   #22
Cirdan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2013
Location: Tahoe
Posts: 363
"If you mean .22s and .25s specifically, it's probably a matter of there not being much demand.

There are some small, polymer-framed .380s. "

Exactly. Given how easy it is to carry one of the small .380s, like the LCP, why would you want a .32 or less? There are even some 9's approaching that size.
Cirdan is offline  
Old July 5, 2017, 11:51 PM   #23
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,986
Quote:
While I can see that for the 1911, I've owned a number of subcompacts with barrels shorter than that and were reliable. M&P 9c, Glock 26, P2000sk, and probably some I'm forgetting.
His business isn't limited to only 1911s, but you are correct that his focus is probably some what narrower than most.

I didn't intend for the quote to be viewed as proof that a pistol with a barrel under 4.25" can't be reliable. I quoted it as supporting evidence that pistol reliability tends to be reduced when the gun size/weight is reduced.

Is 4.25" the lower barrel length limit for a reliable pistol? Nope, I carry a CW9/P9 which has a barrel length of 3.6" and clearly I believe it's reliable or I wouldn't carry it. But I do realize that its small size and light weight means it likely won't be as tolerant of ammo variations or poor shooting grip as a larger, heavier gun would be.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old July 6, 2017, 12:09 AM   #24
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,212
Quote:
I didn't intend for the quote to be viewed as proof that a pistol with a barrel under 4.25" can't be reliable.
I didn't take it that way. I was simply sharing my own experience.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is offline  
Old July 6, 2017, 09:40 AM   #25
gglass
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 638
I cannot imagine needing anything smaller or lighter than an LCP in .380 ACP. It has the minimum cartridge size that I would ever want for self defense, and with a weight of around 10oz, it does not sag my jeans or shorts. With just enough polymer grip to hold onto, and a slide just long enough to accurately aim, what more (or less) could I ask for?



__________________
"...shall not be infringed." (Must be 18. Void where prohibited. Some restrictions may apply. Not available in all states).
gglass is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07120 seconds with 8 queries