The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 19, 2016, 08:28 PM   #1
Bucksnort1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2013
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 1,121
Cannelures

Last week, a friend was with me when I loaded some 44 magnum JHPs with cannelures. He is not a re-loader. I explained a few things to him including why we sometimes seat bullets with cannelures to the cannelure then crimp at that point. He asked if there is any leakage of gasses at the cannelure. That is my question.

Is there any gas leakage at the cannelure?
Bucksnort1 is offline  
Old January 19, 2016, 09:04 PM   #2
Ole Joe Clark
Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2015
Location: Heart of Dixie
Posts: 52
No
Ole Joe Clark is offline  
Old January 20, 2016, 09:52 AM   #3
Bucksnort1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2013
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 1,121
Ole Joe,

You are a man of few words. Thanks.
Bucksnort1 is offline  
Old January 20, 2016, 10:01 AM   #4
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
Is there any gas leakage at the cannelure?
I suggest reloaders purchase R. Lee’s book on modern reloading; and then read it. I know there are many reloaders that claim they purchased the book; base on feed back I see little evidence their book has ever been opened, just saying.

Older reloading manuals suggested crimping was a bad habit because their was an illusion crimping improved bullet hole. Granted; that created an answer without a question; meaning before the Internet there was bullet hold, after the Internet someone invented neck tension with no way to measure it. I have tension gages, all of my tension gages measure in pounds not tensions. I have deviation gages, my deviations gages measure in pounds of deflection; the gages that are not calibrated in pounds or marked off in thousandths.

If the bullet has a cannelure and a crimp is to be applied it is suggested the crimp be applied at the cannuler. Then there is that thing about following instructions and the cannelure is not located where the reloader thinks it should ‘be located’.

I have a machine, the machine allows me to add a cannelure or it allows me to apply a cannelure on a bullet that did not have one. My opinion; the tool is nothing more than something nice to have because I do not have a tool that measure neck tension. I have tools that measure bullet hold. I want all the bullet hold I can get.

Quote:
I explained a few things to him including why we sometimes seat bullets with cannelures to the cannelure then crimp at that point.
http://m14forum.com/ammunition/79474...cannelure.html
F. Guffey is offline  
Old January 20, 2016, 10:40 AM   #5
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
No

Quote:
You are a man of few words. Thanks.
If there is leakage the leakage is around the bullet. For years reloaders thought the bullet was ‘THE SEAL’. And then? Before that the military had to change everything they thought they knew about the sequence of events beginning with dropping the firing pin on the primer.

A photographer decided he would stand behind a big gun to catch the moment the crew lit up the sky. When he developed the photograph he had no ideal what he was looking at. Not knowing what he was looking at did not slow him down. He published the picture and won and the picture was recognized as ‘art’.

Later the military saw the picture and said something like “WHAT!?” It tool the military types months to sort things out. The biggy was gas passing the bullet.

F. Guffey

Forgive, all of this took place +/- a few years of 1913.
F. Guffey is offline  
Old January 20, 2016, 10:40 AM   #6
Mauser69
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2014
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 204
Quote:
I suggest reloaders purchase R. Lee’s book on modern reloading; and then read it. I know there are many reloaders that claim they purchased the book; base on feed back I see little evidence their book has ever been opened, just saying.
Man, ain't that the truth!
__________________
NRA Family Life members, TSRA Life member, USAF vet and American Legion member.
Mauser69 is offline  
Old January 20, 2016, 10:21 PM   #7
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
Mr. Guffey is giving both excellent advice and a good example of gas bypass.

If you look online for some of the super high speed slow motion video of bullets firing, you see the puff of bypass gas that precedes the bullet to the muzzle. Dr. Lloyd Brownell describes how it is affected by seating depth and how it, in turn, affects peak pressure. Look at pages 45-51, here.

The main thing is that pressure expands the brass at the neck away from the bullet faster than it can move the bullet mass significantly forward. Therefore, gas starts leaking out at the case mouth and goes around the bullet until the bullet covers the free-travel distance (aka, bullet jump to the lands) so its widest diameter can begin creating a seal. That's the gas you see preceding the bullet in the slow motion videos.

Pressure peels the neck brass from the bullet starting at the bullet base and moving forward. At the moment the lifting of the brass reaches the case mouth, gas starts to escape, creating a pressure drop that stops the neck being expanded much further. The result, which you can find on any rifle case, is the mouth of the case hasn't expanded quite as much as the rest of the neck below it. Often, if the chamber neck isn't too loose, you find a new bullet will not fall into it until you expand it slightly.

Below is an image of .308 case, the bottom one a newly fired case and the upper one well-used. Both show the little bit of inward curl at the mouth.

So How does a cannelure affect that? My expectation would be that when there is a crimped cannelure, it will delay the start of bypass because the crimped case mouth takes a little more time and effort to lift clear of the bullet, which is probably how it raises start pressure. It would seem likely that as it starts to lift, gas can, indeed, start to bleed through the grooves in the cannelure, so the mouth may not lift quite as far as it does from a smooth bullet surface until after the bullet had moved the cannelure past the mouth, and thus it adds a little drag to the bullet's initial motion. A cast bullet crimp groove would behave no differently. Indeed, I have some jacketed bullets of foreign manufacture that have crimp grooves in them; a sort of toothless cannelure. They are not very accurate, though. It's not easy to avoid distorting a bullet when you roll any kind of groove into it. This is why match bullets don't have cannelures. Though, frankly, the big bullet makers have gotten pretty good at rolling cannelures with minimal distortion, and I've had some very accurate Hornady and Sierra bullets that have cannelures.

__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old January 21, 2016, 02:04 PM   #8
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
IMHO, the cannelure is so short, relative to the rest of the seated bullet, that gas leaking past it, would have already passed by the rest of the seated bullet. Thus, no different than an uncannelured bullet using a taper crimp. Now if the cannelure ran the whole length of the seated part of the bullet, you might have an issue.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old January 22, 2016, 08:26 PM   #9
Ole Joe Clark
Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2015
Location: Heart of Dixie
Posts: 52
The OP asked the question: Does gas leak at the channelure? Not the base. As the bullet exits the barrel gas will mushroom out of the barrel and past the base of the bullet. The short answer to the question is still "No."
Ole Joe Clark is offline  
Old January 22, 2016, 08:36 PM   #10
flashhole
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2005
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 2,000
What would the perfect round with a crimp look like?

Consider putting the loaded round under a microscope. What would you expect to see?

If you had to make thousands of loaded rounds with "acceptable" performance, what engineering design tradeoffs would you make?
__________________
,,, stupidity comes to some people very easily. 8/22/2017 my wife in a discussion about Liberals.

Are you ready for civil war?
flashhole is offline  
Old January 25, 2016, 10:16 AM   #11
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
The OP asked the question: Does gas leak at the channelure? Not the base. As the bullet exits the barrel gas will mushroom out of the barrel and past the base of the bullet. The short answer to the question is still "No."

I understood the question; it reminds me of the topic of annealing when reloaders start telling me everything they know about the subject of annealing. Gas passes the bullet, again, I believe a good start for a reloader would be to purchase R. Lee’s book on modern reloading. Next? Read the book.

Then there was this picture taken the moment the bullet left the barrel close to 100 years ago. The picture never made it to a reloading manual it did however make to a book or art; anyhow, that is where I found it. There it is, the atmosphere so compressed moisture is visible in the form of a cloud. And then; the smoke ring, behind the smoke ring the bullet, behind the bullet the rest of the gas so defined the rifling can be counted. The rest of the gas left the barrel at 90 degree.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05237 seconds with 10 queries