The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 31, 2013, 06:46 AM   #1
skizzums
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
.38 spl projectiles

hey guys, i'm going to be loading .38spl for the first time this weekend. theres so many choices on bullets, i was wondering if ya'll had some advice what to get. this is our first revolver and its a lightweight .357. it's actually for my wife and i want to keep recoil low to begin with. the option for projectiles at my reload shop are:
.357/158GR ROUND NOSE
.357/158GR SEMI-WADCUTTER
.357/148GR WADCUTTER
.357/148GR SWAGED HOLLOW BASE WADCUTTER
.357/158GR ROUND NOSE FLAT POINT
.357/125GR ROUND NOSE FLAT POINT

i will be using 38. spl cases and hp38 powder.
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed
skizzums is offline  
Old October 31, 2013, 07:08 AM   #2
Gdawgs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 656
For 38 special, you want to get a bullet that is softer lead, not hard cast. I leaded up my barrel something fierce by loading wimpy 38 special loads using hard cast bullets designed for 357 pressures.

If you are just plinking, the wadcutters would be a good choice. Swaged bullets are extremely soft since they are almost pure lead. They work well, but you do not want to drive them any faster than 800 fps, otherwise you'll lead up your barrel. But since you are intending to make soft recoiling loads, this is where you'll want to be anyway. Hodgdon shows a starting load of 2.7 grains of Titegroup with this bullet. Velocity of 771 fps. That would be perfect.

Any of the bullets would work, but again, I'd advise against hard bullets for the wimpy loads. If you will be loading up some 357s eventually, get a box of hard cast for those, don't use the soft bullets for that.
Gdawgs is offline  
Old October 31, 2013, 07:20 AM   #3
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
Either the 148 wadcutters or the 158 flat-points. Maybe get 500 or each? If you just get one, start with the plain cast wadcutters, you can load those very light or +P.

The 125 grain bullets might shoot low. 148 and 158 should shoot to point of aim.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old October 31, 2013, 07:36 AM   #4
skizzums
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
okay, thanks guys. i like the idea of only using 2.7gr of powder, that's pretty amazing. the bullets are cheap enough, i'll do the swaged and try another one. i do want to work her up to a higher recoil, just not turn her off right off the bat. she is used to shooting a full-size m&p 9mm, so this will surely be a big difference. thanks again.
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed
skizzums is offline  
Old October 31, 2013, 08:04 AM   #5
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
I've been shooting hundreds of cast wadcutters lately with 2.8 grains of Promo powder (cheaper version of Red Dot.) It's a hotter load than a lot of people use with wadcutters, but I like it better than using 2.5 grains. No leading at all after shooting 90 of them last Tuesday night -- just graphite, burnt lube and powder, etc. One patch and the bore was clean.

Bullseye or 231 are probably better powder choices than Red Dot (because they measure easier), but I have 8 pounds of Promo and it is very accurate.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old October 31, 2013, 08:16 AM   #6
ligonierbill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 2,456
My practice load is a Speer swaged 158 SWCHP at 800. Cheap, accurate, pleasant to shoot.
ligonierbill is offline  
Old October 31, 2013, 09:45 AM   #7
warhwkbb
Member
 
Join Date: September 1, 2011
Posts: 32
If you are concerned with recoil, lighter projectiles will kick less. The trade-off is bullets that might shoot a bit low. HP38 is a great powder that can take you from mousefart to near +p, but is best at target velocities. I personally would recommend the 148gr wadcutter.
warhwkbb is offline  
Old October 31, 2013, 02:39 PM   #8
Sevens
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
Quote:
i like the idea of only using 2.7gr of powder, that's pretty amazing.
Personally, I wouldn't get too excited. In raw numbers, it really is about half a typical charge weight, so no matter what volume we are talking about... whether you buy powder one pound at a time for $24, it's like paying $12, or if you get it in 8lb jugs as I always do, then it's like getting twice the powder for your $140 expenditure. I *DO* understand that, and I am not arguing against that.

However, the powder charge (especially in handgun rounds) is of so little consequence that when you take in to consideration everything that goes in to the equation of building great handloads... it is the part of LEAST consequence. Really, truly.

My point isn't that a load running a 2.7 grain charge is a "bad" load or a bad idea. I mean nothing of the sort. Obviously, the historic "go-to" championship bullseye competition load is the 2.7gr of Bullseye charge. Would be foolish to argue that it's not a great load.

What I am saying is that there's so many different parts that go in to concocting a great load, the powder charge weight should be FAR back in the list of goals.

If you do intend to make a load that runs a REALLY light charge weight, please consider:

--the powder should be an -EASY- one for you to obtain, locally, in-stock
--your equipment MUST be 100% capable of dropping that tiny little charge consistently, every single time, with no variance, no bridging, and -NO- exceptions.

If you are running a 5.6 grain charge and your device throws a charge that is 0.2 grains light (for whatever) reason, then maybe you get a slight drop in velocity or maybe you never notice it.

If you are running a 2.7 grain charge weight and your device throws a light charge (or maybe the guy flipping the lever on your device short-shucks it by accident! ) and you end up with a 2.5 or a 2.4gr charge... Is your slug going to exit the barrel?!

Any load can be a great load... sometimes we solicit opinions from others for ideas, but in all cases... you have to put in the work to FIND what ends up being a "great load!" for your needs. It's a fantastic feeling, when you've arrived at a load that works so well for you that you can nearly etch it in stone and make THOUSANDS of them.

My point is simply that a 2.7gr charge weight is -NOT- an attractive feature for a load, in my opinion.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss.
Sevens is offline  
Old October 31, 2013, 02:46 PM   #9
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,542
My usual low recoil target load for .38 Special is a 148 gr HBWC and 3.2 gr of HP38. A bevel base or double ended wadcutter will shoot about the same.

The repeated reference to 2.7 gr is standard for Bullseye, not HP38.
Jim Watson is online now  
Old October 31, 2013, 03:37 PM   #10
45long
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2011
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 106
hp38 was designed for the 38 spl , hence the name hp-38. luckily for you they loads will be on the bottle. just subtract 10% and work your way up. see what you like. pretty simple huh?
__________________
N0MJP
45long is offline  
Old October 31, 2013, 08:46 PM   #11
10 Spot Terminator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2008
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 348
For sheer accuracy at low charge weights it would be hard to beat the 148gr hollowbase wadcutter . It performs best with lower felt recoil due to the lighter bullet weight . Do not get adventurous and try to load them very warm as it will blow the skirts off the bullets. If it were to be mid range to upper end loads then I would opt for the 158gr LRNFP . Best combonation of accuracy , penetration and terminal performance .

10 Spot
10 Spot Terminator is offline  
Old October 31, 2013, 09:12 PM   #12
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,523
Quote:
For sheer accuracy at low charge weights it would be hard to beat the 148gr hollowbase wadcutter . It performs best with lower felt recoil due to the lighter bullet weight . Do not get adventurous and try to load them very warm as it will blow the skirts off the bullets.
^^ I was just gonna say that. ^^

148 HBWC's are second to none for accuracy. But they are to only be loaded at target velocities/pressures. They are for one purpose and one purpose only. And they do it extremely well.

Also: you're in luck - HP-38 is an excellent powder for your application.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old October 31, 2013, 09:45 PM   #13
chewie146
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 853
Keep it hard cast lead and push it a little light, and it should be good. One of my favorite loads is a HC wadcutter over a mid range load of Unique. It's low-recoil, high in penetration, and accurate out to about 50 yards. After that, it nosedives. I imagine with a light .357, 10 yards is more your goal. If you're looking for practice only, any HC loads will be great. You can push a hard cast bullet faster than a jacketed bullet with the same powder charge.
chewie146 is offline  
Old November 1, 2013, 06:16 AM   #14
rebs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
I seen the ole accuracy load for 148 gr but what would be a known accurate load for 38 spl with 158 gr lswc ?
rebs is offline  
Old November 1, 2013, 06:45 AM   #15
TimSr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
Quote:
Quote:
For sheer accuracy at low charge weights it would be hard to beat the 148gr hollowbase wadcutter . It performs best with lower felt recoil due to the lighter bullet weight . Do not get adventurous and try to load them very warm as it will blow the skirts off the bullets.

^^ I was just gonna say that. ^^

148 HBWC's are second to none for accuracy. But they are to only be loaded at target velocities/pressures. They are for one purpose and one purpose only. And they do it extremely well.

Also: you're in luck - HP-38 is an excellent powder for your application.
I agree.
TimSr is offline  
Old November 1, 2013, 06:10 PM   #16
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,523
Quote:
I seen the ole accuracy load for 148 gr but what would be a known accurate load for 38 spl with 158 gr lswc ?
rebs: I load 158 LSWC's with both 3.2g Bullseye, or 4.0g W231 (usually the 231). Both are very accurate. If I had to guess, I'd say that all the recipes for 158 LSWC's in the Speer #14 (pg 876) are accurate.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old November 2, 2013, 08:35 AM   #17
Woodyed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2010
Location: Central NYS
Posts: 104
Hard Cast in 38 Spec.

Gdwags- don't understand why you got leading using hard cast bullets in your 38 spec. I've used hard cast bullets (18 BRN) in my 38 spec many times, some loads even in the 730 fps range, with no leading evident at all. I've always assumed that the reason behind using hard cast bullets was to eliminate leading at any velocity.
Woodyed is offline  
Old November 2, 2013, 08:44 AM   #18
m&p45acp10+1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,930
I cast my own using the Lee 158 grain Tumble Lube SWC mold. I shoot them using either Trail Boss, or a light load of Win 231/HP 38. Recoil is very light, and accuracy is better than I can milk them for without a rest. Using a sand bag both loads gave under 2 inches at 25 yards with a 4 inch Mod 67-1 which is about as good as I can do with my eyes. A friend of mine that is a better shot made one ragged hole with both.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you.
m&p45acp10+1 is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 12:41 AM   #19
skizzums
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
sorry, i havent looked back at this thread before posting another one. although most of my questions were answered here. i picked up 1k of the swaged hollow base wadcutters. loadin them up in the mron. thanks for the info.
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed
skizzums is offline  
Old November 11, 2013, 08:55 PM   #20
skizzums
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
loaded up 200 of the 148gr swaged hollow base wc. used remington primers and 3.2gr hp38. it was a pleasure to shoot. loved it
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 382.jpg (242.4 KB, 15 views)
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed
skizzums is offline  
Old November 11, 2013, 09:07 PM   #21
Crunchy Frog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 591
The 148 grain wadcutter is the traditional target shooting load for the .38 Special. Sort of a flying soup can. It makes cookie-cutter like holes in paper targets for easier scoring.

I shoot cowboy action with .38 Special loads; we tend to shoot lighter bullets like 125 or 105 grain bullets. The 125 is a good choice for light recoiling plinking or target loads but you might find that these light bullets hit below point of aim with a fixed sight revolver.
Crunchy Frog is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10011 seconds with 11 queries