The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 30, 2006, 10:28 PM   #1
Maser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 21, 2006
Location: Mysterious Cities of Gold
Posts: 920
Silencer & recoil question

I know this may seem like a dumb question, so don't be too hard on me ok.

Anyways, from lots of reading on this forum and other forums that talk about silencers, it seems like they actually add more felt recoil to the gun. Why is that? I know what a silencer looks like on the inside and it seems to me that with the baffles it is like a giant muzzle brake. So how on earth does it ADD recoil to the gun? Is it only muzzle silencers that do it, or does it also happen with integral silencers too?

Sorry for the idiotic question, but I got 4 years to go before I can buy NFA items.
Maser is offline  
Old November 30, 2006, 10:36 PM   #2
kozak6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,113
I was under the impression that they reduced recoil due to the slowing/cooling of the expanding gasses.

Interesting question.

I would definitely like to see a more informed response.
kozak6 is offline  
Old December 1, 2006, 12:57 AM   #3
CALNRA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 14, 2006
Posts: 242
from what I understand, the expelled gas from an unsuppressed firearm allows the escaping gas to spread out into the atmosphere, and a lot of the force is taken care of that way.

with a suppressor, the gases are rerouted through the baffles, and that gas pushes on the metal and adds to the rear-ward momento.

the muzzle breaks lets the gas out on the side channels, whereas on the suppressors they have no such channels to escape(hence the sound reduction).

I could be wrong but that all I can think of from looking at the suppresors I have used while visiting free America. The difference is not big, but in my weird mind it's there. I think.
CALNRA is offline  
Old December 1, 2006, 01:59 AM   #4
Zak Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 1999
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Posts: 2,682
I have shot suppressors in 223, 9mm, 300 Whisper, 6.8 SPC, 308, 260, 338 Lapua, and 50 BMG, and most of them same rifles with brakes on. I currently own 3 cans.

Here's the deal.

A rifle with neither a suppressor nor a brake will have the most recoil.

Comparing "good" muzzle brakes to suppressors, I have noticed that in smaller calibers like 223, 260, 308, and 308, the rifle has less recoil with the suppressor than the brake.

In larger calibers like 338 Lapua and 50 BMG, the suppressor has more recoil than the brake. I attribute this to the fact that these bullets are pretty heavy, period, and the suppressor is not designed to immediately turn the forward momentum of the gas into recoil abatement. The suppressor buffers the pressure but still releases it forward.

The brakes immediately pull the rifle forward during the primary recoil impulse.
__________________
Zak Smith . DEMIGOD LLC . THUNDER BEAST ARMS CORP . COLORADO MULTI-GUN
My PM inbox full? Send e-mail instead.
Zak Smith is offline  
Old December 1, 2006, 02:09 AM   #5
Maser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 21, 2006
Location: Mysterious Cities of Gold
Posts: 920
Thanks CALNRA and Zak Smith. Makes a lot of sense now. My only experience with suppressors was with a 10/22 with integral suppressor and a 1911 with a muzzle one. Noticed nothing different with the 10/22 obviously and neither with the 1911. I figured in the case of the 1911, it was just the cycling action that was giving me felt recoil. And before I get any BATF agents on my behind, I shot these suppressed guns at my uncle's ranch in Nevada and he's got class III status.

Anyways, thanks for shedding some light on this for me. Maybe this ought to be a topic on the Mythbusters show sometime.
Maser is offline  
Old December 1, 2006, 08:15 AM   #6
mxwelch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Posts: 379
I've shot a variety of suppressor and they neither add nor remove any noticeable recoil. The escaping gas has nowhere to go once it leaves the muzzle but inside of the can. A break is different because it allows the gas to hit a surface which "pushes" the weapon away from the shooter and then the gas is dissipated out of the sides of the break. A can doesn't dissipate the gas the same way. That being said I can see where and integral with bleed holes in the front cap could increase recoil.
mxwelch is offline  
Old December 1, 2006, 11:45 AM   #7
Zak Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 1999
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Posts: 2,682
mxwelch,

Shoot a centerfire rifle supprssor at night, with some light, and it's pretty obvious that gas shoots out the front hole of the suppressor. It does so delayed and at lower pressure than a bare muzzle.

-z
__________________
Zak Smith . DEMIGOD LLC . THUNDER BEAST ARMS CORP . COLORADO MULTI-GUN
My PM inbox full? Send e-mail instead.
Zak Smith is offline  
Old December 1, 2006, 09:43 PM   #8
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
There are two major components of recoil. The first is bullet movement - the mass x velocity of the bullet equals the mass x velocity of the gun going the other way.

Except that the suppressor, brake or whatever adds weight (mass) to the gun, that recoil component is not affected in any way by their presence, given the same mass and velocity of the bullet.

The other major component of recoil is the "jet" affect of the powder gasses as they leave the muzzle both before and after the bullet. Depending on the design of a suppressor, the gas is slowed down and cooled, so that component is reduced somewhat.

A brake reduces recoil not by reducing the volume or speed of exiting gas, but by redirecting it. By forcing part of it in another direction (usually upward), the jet effect of that part of the gas is not only removed from the line of the barrel, but is made to push the muzzle in a direction that will compensate for some of the recoil. Directing some of the gas directly to the rear would pull the gun forward, reducing recoil still more, but the shooter would definitely prefer not to take that route.

As a practical matter, no suppressor I have used has reduced recoil by any noticeable amount.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old December 1, 2006, 10:18 PM   #9
mxwelch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Posts: 379
Quote:
Shoot a centerfire rifle supprssor at night, with some light, and it's pretty obvious that gas shoots out the front hole of the suppressor. It does so delayed and at lower pressure than a bare muzzle.
True, but I've never noticed a difference with and without the can.
mxwelch is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05713 seconds with 8 queries