The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 26, 2008, 01:16 PM   #1
Uncle Ben
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 400
.30-30 Mossberg or Marlin

The price is close to identical. Is one any more accurate than the other?
What are your preferences?

By the way, this would be my first hunting rifle, and I do plan to mount a scope for some uses...
__________________
Lazy + Complacent = DISARMED
*FIGHT to keep your guns & join the NRA. Contact your representatives about 2A issues at www.capwiz.com/nra/dbq/officials and to be kept up to date on the current issues visit www.nraila.org
Uncle Ben is offline  
Old November 26, 2008, 01:31 PM   #2
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
Let me qualify my response first with... I AM A MOSSBERG SHOTGUN MAN!!!
Go Marlin and you will never look back! The Mossberg is a modified Winchester 94. The fact you mention scope SCREAMS XXXXXXXX Marlin. Fully side ejected thru a side ejection port rather than a top ejection port with a little sideways kick to the spent shell.
Another plus is a single round can be dropped in the open side port and action closed and it works like a single shot.
Accuracy... marlins often cloverleaf at 100 yards so they are just fine there too...
Brent

Last edited by hogdogs; November 26, 2008 at 01:43 PM. Reason: Brain fart while typing!
hogdogs is offline  
Old November 26, 2008, 01:38 PM   #3
zoomie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: GA
Posts: 1,862
??

Isn't that backwards? Wouldn't scope scream Marlin with its side ejection vs the top ejection with the Mossy?

Mossy 464:

Marlin 336:
zoomie is offline  
Old November 26, 2008, 01:41 PM   #4
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
OOPS YES SCOPE A MARLIN!!! Brain Fart while typing!!!
Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old November 26, 2008, 01:46 PM   #5
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
Here is my vintage 1977...


Scope is too big but previous owner just had to have a "deer rifle" with a "real scope" I will remove it after my first deer!
Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old November 26, 2008, 02:47 PM   #6
Inspector3711
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2008
Location: Puget Sound Washington
Posts: 1,553
I only know Marlin... I say go with the Marlin.
__________________
"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." The Dalai Llama (5/15/01, The Seattle Times)
"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there." George Orwell
Inspector3711 is offline  
Old November 26, 2008, 03:31 PM   #7
Uncle Ben
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 400
Well, I would definitely want the option of a scope, so Marlin it is. Does Marlin currently make them without the checkering/detailing (like your '77)? I actually prefer the more simple look of the Mossberg for that reason, but I won't not buy the Marlin because of that.

Thanks for the input.
Uncle Ben is offline  
Old November 26, 2008, 03:52 PM   #8
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
You can scope the mossberg. That is one reason they modified the receiver. Those 2 small sections on top are drilled. According to the Marlin site, all the lever guns are checkered. I would look around for a used rifle. If you are not familiar with buying used ones, find a buddy to take with you. I was the one who inspected this one for PO and he bought it for $179 OUT THE DOOR when $179 was their asking. Upon further inspection and cleaning I found it to be either barely fired with just typical bluing removal on the hammer and lever. Mag tube internally was actually still shiny and follower looked new. It has some less than perfect exterior metal finish and some very small dots of rust on the side plates but for a 30+ year old firearm and in my spartan like hands it is a cherry find! the kid just had to have my Lorcin WORE OUT .380 and I wouldn't put a dollar price on it (not worth selling) so when he offered me his Maverick 88 12 gauge pump with less than 250 rounds thru it and this Marlin I figured it was my duty to give him a simple economics lesson I was going to let him trade back but he got disgusted with the Lorcin, as I promised he would, and sold it for 50 bucks so the trade back plan was shelved...
Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old November 26, 2008, 05:28 PM   #9
Byron Quick
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Waynesboro, Georgia, USA
Posts: 2,361
What in the world were you doing with a Lorcin to begin with? And how did you get it to work long enough to wear it out?

Oh, wait, I understand upon reflection. It came new from the factory worn out.
Byron Quick is offline  
Old November 26, 2008, 05:36 PM   #10
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
It was given to me by a well meaning buddy when I mucked up my left arm in a roll over crash and I am a left handed guy so he felt bad I wasn't gonna be boxin' my way out of trouble. It was good for one shot point blank. Mag was junk. An unfired round would fit down the muzzle I never carried it though. Never felt that much safer with that thing. By the time he got it to me i was healin' pretty well. While still not and never will be normal I can push some one off with my left while I draw my knife. Just prior to wrecking I had walked him thru getting good with a pistol and steering him to a GOOD CCP and he chose the XD40...
Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old November 29, 2008, 06:10 PM   #11
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,806
They would have to pay me to take the Mossberg out of the store. If you want a Marlin with no checkering the used gun racks are your friend. They are plentiful and relatively inexpensive. Although I like the Marlin a little better there are also lots of Winchesters on the used racks as well. I cannot see paying what they want for the Mossberg when I can still buy the real thing used for a lot less. Most guns are not used enough to do anything more than get them broken in anyway.
jmr40 is offline  
Old November 30, 2008, 10:36 PM   #12
T-Ray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 26, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 288
Marlin, hands down
__________________
In God We Trust.

www.texasguntalk.com/forums
T-Ray is offline  
Old December 1, 2008, 10:35 AM   #13
Uncle Ben
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 400
Marlin it is. Thanks guys. I will definitely consider used as well.
Uncle Ben is offline  
Old December 2, 2008, 10:28 PM   #14
KBG
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 25, 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 32
If you can find a pre-64 Winchester 94 get one and forget the scope, if you have trouble seeing -get glasses! These are short range rifles and glass'in a shot is insane.
KBG is offline  
Old December 2, 2008, 11:16 PM   #15
bclark1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,531
I also think Mossberg makes great shotguns, I have nicer shotguns than my Mossy now but I still take most of the scattergun game with it. It was my first hunting gun, and will be in use for a long time to come.

But, Marlin is the first name in leverguns as far as I'm concerned. I have an 1895G and can't say a bad thing about it. I believe they all ship with a swap-able hammer or hammer extension to make it that much easier to put a scope on top too.
bclark1 is offline  
Old December 2, 2008, 11:24 PM   #16
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
There's a good article on the Mossberg here-

http://www.gunblast.com/LFCombs_Mossberg464.htm
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is online now  
Old December 3, 2008, 11:20 AM   #17
Uncle Ben
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 400
KBG, aren't these affective up to 200 yards? I can't imagine using only the open sights up to that distance, but I am a beginner...
Uncle Ben is offline  
Old December 3, 2008, 11:23 AM   #18
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
If I can see it well in the scope I might exceed 150 but that is due to my limiting my shot for offhand only shots. 200 is still in kill range and with the hornady leverevolution ammo 300..
Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old December 3, 2008, 01:23 PM   #19
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
The 30-30 with common ammunition still kills well at 235 yards or so. I whacked a forkhorn at that distance with basic 150 grain WW ammo, and knocked a thumb-sized chunk of bone out the off-side shoulder.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is online now  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06748 seconds with 10 queries