The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 24, 2017, 06:39 PM   #1
Targa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2014
Posts: 2,084
M9 Beretta guide rod

I picked up a M9 yesterday and I love the gun but man that cheap, flimsy guide rod is a borderline insult in cost cutting. I have already ordered a proper steel one that should have been used in the first place. Anyway I digress, has anyone kept that plastic insult long enough to see if there any adverse affects to it after a couple thousand rounds or so?
Targa is offline  
Old January 24, 2017, 07:18 PM   #2
DubC-Hicks
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2009
Location: Backwoods, Northern MI
Posts: 1,031
Mine has been plastic for the whole time I've had it, for a few thousand rounds or so. Never had a problem with it. I believe military issue M9s have plastic guide rods as well.

One issue I have heard about with switching to metal guide rods, is the rod bending when it gets hit or something. Plastic guide rods just flex and go right back to how they are supposed to be.
__________________
”Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars.” ~Unknown
DubC-Hicks is offline  
Old January 24, 2017, 07:31 PM   #3
iraiam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
I think the polymer guide rod is actually part of the "sand resistant" scheme of the pistol. A steel guide rod will work fine, but steel can get bent. I have several 92/M9 pistols, I have changed some of the guide rods to steel for aesthetic reasons, I have also used the polymer rod extensively without issues.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason
iraiam is offline  
Old January 24, 2017, 07:44 PM   #4
GeneS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2000
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 190
Yeah, the plastic guide rod is actually the better one.
GeneS is offline  
Old January 24, 2017, 07:55 PM   #5
Targa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2014
Posts: 2,084
Ok everyone thank you, I will stick with the polymer and have the steel as a backup. I am just use to military issued M9's and they do have the steel rod. I knew the rods were plastic in the later offerings but when I took it a part and saw the thing I was pretty surprised at how.....well, flimsy it appeared. Sounds like it is good to go, thanks again.
Targa is offline  
Old January 25, 2017, 12:54 AM   #6
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
Haven't heard any reports of problems with the plastic rods. The irony is that I have heard of the two-piece steel rods failing...
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old January 25, 2017, 04:39 AM   #7
b.thomas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Posts: 461
I started thinking about going the metal route with my Smith 910s. Was advised on here and another web site to stick with the plastic!
five-six years later now and somewhere around two thousand rounds...........the plastic guide rod is still chugging along just fine.
Just might go with metal some day when I need a too change the guide rod, but for now I'll stay with the plastic!
As the old saying goes..............iffen she ain't broke, don't try to fix it!
b.thomas is offline  
Old January 25, 2017, 08:32 AM   #8
rodfac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,623
My son has over 5000 round through his 92 with no guide rod problems. Rod
__________________
Cherish our flag, honor it, defend it in word and deed, or get the hell out. Our Bill of Rights has been paid for by heros in uniform and shall not be diluted by misguided governmental social experiments. We owe this to our children, anything less is cowardice. USAF FAC, 5th Spl Forces, Vietnam Vet '69-'73.
rodfac is offline  
Old January 25, 2017, 08:49 AM   #9
Model12Win
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
Military M9s have plastic guide rods now. They are every bit as good as the steel ones and offer some benefits. You do NOT need or even want a steel guide rod, trust me on this. It is not a "cost cutting measure" but one of performance. Stick with the plastic guide rod and buy ammo instead.
Model12Win is offline  
Old January 25, 2017, 09:48 AM   #10
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by b.thomas
I started thinking about going the metal route with my Smith 910s. Was advised on here and another web site to stick with the plastic!
FWIW the issue on S&W metal-frame DA/SA auto pistols is different than with Berettas. On the Smiths, the guide rod has to sit in a tiny sharp-edged metal shelf under the barrel during reassembly, and if the edge of the plastic rod becomes rounded off, it may refuse to stay put, making reassembly a PITA. Some S&W fans prefer steel guide rods for this reason.

The guide rod retaining lug on the Beretta is much larger, so this is not a problem.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak
carguychris is offline  
Old January 25, 2017, 10:15 AM   #11
Martowski
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2000
Location: Texas (By Way of Illinois)
Posts: 1,376
Plastic rod here in my 92fs, no problems at all.

Back in the 80's they said a plastic frame on a pistol would never work and look where we are now.
__________________
Midwestern Ramblings (my amateur firearms blog): http://martowski.wordpress.com/
Martowski is offline  
Old January 25, 2017, 10:31 AM   #12
g.willikers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
What are the chances that polymer frames can flex and a steel guide rod might bind where a plastic one won't?
Just a thought.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez:
“Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.”
g.willikers is offline  
Old January 25, 2017, 01:15 PM   #13
Martowski
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2000
Location: Texas (By Way of Illinois)
Posts: 1,376
I wouldn't think the guide rod would come into contact with the frame or be supported by it at all since it is held between the barrel and slide. But I could be off on this.
__________________
Midwestern Ramblings (my amateur firearms blog): http://martowski.wordpress.com/
Martowski is offline  
Old January 27, 2017, 09:45 AM   #14
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martowski
I wouldn't think the guide rod would come into contact with the frame or be supported by it at all since it is held between the barrel and slide. But I could be off on this.
Pardon delay in replying, hadn't had a chance to fish my 92S out of the safe and take it apart.

The guide rod doesn't remain in contact with the barrel lug; it bears on the takedown latch on rotation to the assembled position. In other words, the takedown latch interposes itself between the guide rod head and the barrel lug.

Since the takedown latch is in direct contact with the frame, it will transmit force directly from the guide rod to the frame.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak
carguychris is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07648 seconds with 8 queries