The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 11, 2016, 09:15 PM   #1
jreXD9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 11, 2009
Posts: 404
Tube extension for 930 SPX--Your experiences?

I'm thinking of adding a +2 or +3 or +4 tube extension to my 930 SPX. Has anyone else done that? What's the main issue to look out for? What brand did you buy? I miss the 8+1 capacity of the 590 I had.
__________________
Don't go ninjin' nobody don't need ninjin'.
jreXD9 is offline  
Old October 14, 2016, 07:58 PM   #2
jreXD9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 11, 2009
Posts: 404
dang.....nobody?
__________________
Don't go ninjin' nobody don't need ninjin'.
jreXD9 is offline  
Old October 15, 2016, 09:05 AM   #3
MarkCO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,308
When you add length to the magazine tube of the 930, that is where a good portion of the malfunctions originate. Shell surge is a thing and since the 930 does not release the next shell on the trigger pull, but while in recoil...not a good combination and well outside of the engineered operating window.

Shorter extensions will obviously cause less issues, as will using a better, or even a HD magazine tube spring. I recommend and use Nordic Components tubes, nuts and springs. There HD spring is good for about 1000 rounds in a 7-8 round capacity. Their standard spring is good for about 1500 rounds, but it is not as strong.
__________________
Good Shooting, MarkCO
www.CarbonArms.us
MarkCO is offline  
Old October 15, 2016, 09:43 AM   #4
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,809
Not specific to the 930, but I've tried extension tubes on other guns and decided they weren't worth the negatives. You can get another 2-3 shells in the magazine, but it adds a considerable amount of weight and at a place where it negatively effects balance. If I felt the 4+1 with a standard tube wasn't enough an ammo carrier on the butt stock works better for me. Not quite as much weight and you typically can carry 5-6 more shells. But the biggest difference is where the weight is located.
jmr40 is offline  
Old October 19, 2016, 09:27 PM   #5
Bushmaster1313
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2008
Posts: 339
If you extend your magazine too far on a New Jersey semi-auto shotgun you become a felon

I might be mistaken, but a standard 7+1 SPX might already be too many.

Also, it might be a felony to have a pistol grip full stock semi-auto New Jersey shotgun
Bushmaster1313 is offline  
Old October 20, 2016, 02:08 PM   #6
dreaming
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2016
Posts: 186
Any defect where the extension interfaces with the magazine can cause problems with loading the tube as well as feeding
dreaming is offline  
Old October 24, 2016, 07:46 PM   #7
jreXD9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 11, 2009
Posts: 404
glad I'm not in Jersey!
__________________
Don't go ninjin' nobody don't need ninjin'.
jreXD9 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06434 seconds with 10 queries