|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 5, 2010, 04:40 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: November 25, 2009
Posts: 20
|
Winchester Model 94 AE in 444
Can I have your thoughts on the rifle and the caliber for deer and boar out to two hundred yards. Also the general impression of the 444 Good or Bad?
|
February 5, 2010, 05:36 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 7,097
|
Perfectly adequate for deer and hog out to 200.
It is a step up mass and energy wise from the 30-30 and the 30-30 is adequate to the task. Jimro
__________________
Machine guns are awesome until you have to carry one. |
February 5, 2010, 06:10 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: July 22, 2008
Location: Central, FL
Posts: 90
|
As a leftie the AE ejects brass in m face. I had one thru my teen years, and sold it when I was in my early 20's. Good gun so no worries there. The 444 round is a very devastating round within 100yds, and still a killer out to 200 (as stated above). Recoil is around the 300WM level, so it may/may not be a nice range gun for you. The 94's are not known to be tack drivers but will get the job done.
|
February 5, 2010, 06:14 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
444 Marlin is adequate out to 250 yds. The Winchester 94 AE is lighter than the Marlin 444, so recoil will be sharper.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
February 5, 2010, 07:40 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2006
Location: Hinterlands of Wisconsin
Posts: 488
|
Works on everything from squirrels to elephants! I believe the Hornady 265 grain loads have around 3400 ft lbs of muzzle energy....just right for squirrels.
|
February 5, 2010, 09:12 PM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2009
Posts: 3
|
Are you looking at a regular M94 .444 with 20" barrel and full magazine, or the .444 Timber Carbine with ported 17 3/4" barrel and short magazine? I had a Timber Carbine .444, weighed 6 pounds even, recoil was STOUT with the small and narrow M94 stock. I had trouble breaking the cross bolts of the Weaver scope rings, twice, and shook reticle loose in a Burris 1 3/4 x 5 scope. Great whitetail deer brush gun, a delight to carry, quick to the shoulder, deadly on deer with 265 gr. Hornady bullets. Just not much fun at the range.
|
February 6, 2010, 10:00 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: December 4, 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 37
|
I have a 94 Timber Carbine in 444 and I agree with oldidaho that recoil is stout. Not a rifle you want to shoot a box of ammo through in one sitting.
The big bore's are cool though and something a little different than everyone else in camp. |
|
|