|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 24, 2014, 03:05 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 298
|
Sheriff wants to conduct their own bankground check
I sent a copy of my C&R ffl renewal application (as per ATF requirements) to the sheriff's office. I received a call from them and they want my DOB so they can run their own background check
As far as I am concerned, I have fulfilled my requirements by sending them a copy of the C&R FFL. Has anyone run across this prior? |
March 24, 2014, 03:23 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 15, 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,416
|
If you've already bought guns in the past and had background checks done, what are your concerns? If you have a carry permit, same thing. If you presently don't have a cary permit and wish to get one in the future, or wish to renew, you're going to need his cooperation, right?
*shrugs* If any of the above applies, what's to lose? |
March 24, 2014, 03:30 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 14, 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,918
|
Sounds like a normal question to me, now if they wanted my SSN then I would question it a little.
__________________
We know exactly where one cow with Mad-cow-disease is located, among the millions and millions of cows in America, but we haven't got a clue where thousands of illegal immigrants and terrorists are |
March 24, 2014, 04:03 PM | #4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
Quote:
Has anyone run across this before? |
||
March 24, 2014, 04:15 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 1999
Location: Northeastern PA
Posts: 755
|
Don't give him anything. You fulfilled the requirement of sending him the paper work you were supposed. All he is entitled to is the notification. If he does anything else, that's on him. But I would not give him any info beyond that which is required with the C & R License.
__________________
Steve |
March 24, 2014, 04:31 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
|
|
March 24, 2014, 04:33 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2010
Posts: 158
|
Seems I heard you can turn c and r papers into your local chief of police instead of the county sheriff.I just applied and haven`t heard back yet but it seems it said right on the application.
|
March 24, 2014, 04:38 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
|
|
March 24, 2014, 05:02 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2013
Location: Western slope of Colorado
Posts: 3,678
|
Does the application require him to "sign off" on it or is it just a notification?
If you dont need his signature then dont bother with his background check. If on the other hand he has to sign any kind of approval for you to get your C & R... You might be stuck going along |
March 24, 2014, 05:04 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 298
|
No sign off required, just supply them with a copy. As you may sense, I feel any additional requirement a step toward infringement.
|
March 24, 2014, 05:07 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
|
Line 9 of the form includes your DOB. He can get it from there if he wants to fun his own background check.
You don't have to give him any further information. Unless there is a city, county, or state law requiring it. Possibly it is just a formality he goes through, possibly his way of harassing C&R license holders. One thing to think about though. The reason the BATF requires you to send a copy of your application to the CLEO is so he can contact them with his opposition to you having the license. So if you don't give him what he already has, will he take it one step further, and request the BATF deny your license.
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING! |
March 24, 2014, 05:27 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 298
|
On the renewal form (5310.11 and the certification of compliance form), there is no location for DOB.
|
March 24, 2014, 06:05 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
|
My bad, didn't even remember that even though I just filled mine out, and sent it in last week.
As you mentioned this is a newly elected sheriff. Possibly just his idea of doing his job. If so, your job is working to make him a one term sheriff. Also, is it possible that it is a newly enacted local law. Did you ask when they called if it a requirement backed by law? I guess you can just ignore them, and hope they just forget about it. Not contact the BATF informing them you are not cooperating with him causing the BATF to delay, or deny your license.
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING! |
March 24, 2014, 07:10 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2009
Posts: 3,282
|
i know nothing about any of this but it seems that if the sheriff wants the OP's DOB . . and it's not a requirement for him to run a background check (sorry, I'm somewhat of a "rebel") . . . I'm sure the OP probably has a Driver's License for the state he lives in? I mean, the Sheriff has the OP's name, his address, etc - how hard is it to "run" he OP and get the DOB?
This sounds like more of an "ego trip" for the Sheriff to make folks jump through hoops that aren't required. There are a lot of good LE officers out there . . . and there are some that shouldn't be . . just like any other profession. Just how many times is it necessary to run a person's background check if it's already been run for the C & R and the CCW? Sometimes one term as Sheriff is enough . . . and I can't believe if he is doing this to folks who have followed all the rules that are required . . . that somewhere down the line he's going to do a "job" on the morale of those who have to work under him.
__________________
If a pair of '51 Navies were good enough for Billy Hickok, then a single Navy on my right hip is good enough for me . . . besides . . . I'm probably only half as good as he was anyways. Hiram's Rangers Badge #63 |
March 24, 2014, 07:21 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
isn't your DOB on your app in the first place?
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
March 24, 2014, 10:58 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: AR
Posts: 1,401
|
Like most posters said, you send your CLEO a copy. The CLEO can be the city Chief of PD, or the Sheriff if you live in the county.
This is what an ATF agent explained to me: If whoever the CLEO is, if they have a problem with you having a FFL, the CLEO needs to notify the ATF. IE: If the applicant is under investigation l locally or some other state/local issue unbeknown to the Feds or ATF. Otherwise the ATF will give you the license. At every renewal from your initial license, you will have to send a copy of your renewal to the CLEO. I always attach a cover letter. |
March 25, 2014, 04:53 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
|
I am a professor of Human Resource Management
Asking a person for their DOB exposes the requester to charges of discrimination under ADEA of 67.
I know this is not an employment situation but even so, if a grievant can convince the EEOC that he or she was discriminated against because of age, it makes the requesters day quite busy providing proof there was no discrimination. The EEOC office's decision to take the case has a lot to do with how busy they are. Persons who need age information are far better advised to ask if the applicant meets age requirements rather than asking the persons age. As an example, I worked for a construction company in a position in which I hired CDL truck drivers. There was a chance that the drivers might need to cross state lines. The DOT required that all CDL drivers crossing state lines had to be at least 21 years of age. This means that the driver was statutorially required to be 21 years of age. That fact made it a BFOQ that CDL drivers had to be 21. But instead of asking for their date of birth, I told them that drivers had to be 21 and merely asked them if they met that criterion. Getting a background check is not something that is protected by ADEA 67. SO EEOC would not likely move against the Sheriff for asking. But in making that determination, the EEOC goes to the alleged aggrieving organization and ruins their day with documentation requests. I handled four cases while I was employed at the construction company. Every one of them went no further than the investigation stage. And every one of them occupied hundreds of man hours providing documentation proving the complaint was unfounded. In order to remain on good terms with the Sheriff, I would provide the information they request. My point is they are not in a strong position in asking the question unless (as has been said before) there is some statute over which the Sheriff has jurisdiction which requires it.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath. Last edited by Doc Hoy; March 25, 2014 at 05:18 AM. |
March 25, 2014, 07:22 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
|
|
March 25, 2014, 08:19 AM | #19 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,367
|
Reach out to the Virginia Citizen's Defense League.
VCDL.org. See what they have to say. Which county?
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
March 25, 2014, 08:33 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 298
|
Stafford
|
March 25, 2014, 08:42 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,705
|
Sorry, but it's hard for me to understand what is the big deal here. I've called law enforcement to report things before and they ask for my name and DOB. If you go to a doctor they identify you by asking for your DOB. People are required to give it out on a regular basis for all kinds of stuff and I just can't see the big deal of giving it to the sheriff so they have a positive I.D. on you.
You might get some legal bunch to scream and yell about it, but in the end, you won't accomplish anything. |
March 25, 2014, 10:10 AM | #22 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,367
|
Actually, quite a bit can be accomplished.
Virginians have for many years been fighting hard against some really onerous and completely unreasonable overreaches by local law enforcement when it comes to the exercise of firearms rights. Prior to 1994 Virginia had a conditional issue CCW system. If you lived in Northern Virginia, pretty much the only way you could get such a permit from from the local sheriff was if you wrote a large enough check to his re-election campaign. When shall issue was put into place, there was an extremely long and protracted fight with local sheriffs and police in many areas who did everthing they could to drag out the issuance process, threw up unreasonable (and extralegal) hurdles, fees, etc. In the early days some sheriffs even said, flat out, that they would under no circumstances issue permits. They were either sued into submission, or replaced. The Legislature had to, several times, pass amendments further defining the law and what local law enforcement could do via the permit process. I don't blame jrinne0430 in the least for being suspicious. I am not, under any circumstances, willing to give local, state, or federal law enforcement more powers than are enumerated in law. That said, I can find nothing that either authorizes or forbids local law enforcement from conducting a background check. The way I read the Federal law, notification of local law enforcement is required, but local law enforcement (LLE) is not required to do anything with the notification. In other words, if YOU don't notify the LLE, your license can be denied, but when you do notify LLE, there is apparently nothing in the regs that either deny them or specifically give them authority to do the background check. I find that to be a bit troubling, and that's why I say contact VCDL.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
March 25, 2014, 10:17 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
|
|
March 25, 2014, 10:25 AM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
|
|
March 25, 2014, 12:50 PM | #25 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2008
Location: Stuart, VA
Posts: 2,473
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Liberty and freedom often offends those who understand neither. Last edited by noelf2; March 25, 2014 at 01:10 PM. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|